Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,584
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    23Yankee
    Newest Member
    23Yankee
    Joined

Severe Event March 25th 2021


Bob's Burgers
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, jojo762 said:

Trio of discrete/semi-discrete cells to watch near the AL/MS border... None of them are particularly strong attm, but perhaps one can become dominant given downstream environment.

HRRR doesn't do too much with them UH wise, but I am not sure I believe that given the environment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

MacLeroy (or his driver) probably should not have attempted to pass on a double yellow.  The other driver was apparently attempting a very slow left turn without signaling.  Hard to tell what he was doing exactly.  I hope everyone’s okay regardless.
That other driver was driving well under the speed limit so I don't blame MacLeroy for trying get away from him.

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That other driver was driving well under the speed limit so I don't blame MacLeroy for trying get away from him.

 

Sent from my Pixel 3 XL using Tapatalk

 

Either way it's still passing on a double yellow... But not gonna argue about it, just like us driving to fire calls, doesn't make it legal.

 

Sent from my SM-G973U using Tapatalk

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Moderately Unstable said:

So, it's difficult to tell, but what you can see on the radar is the *orientation* of the couplet changes. In a handoff, you see two distinct mesos, one weakens, the other strengthens. Here, we have the same meso which was "oriented" "up down" and after passing the radar is now "left right". That's the same circulation. The doppler effect only shows motion towards and away from the radar. Ergo, as you translate around a radar site, the orientation of the couplet can shift as the storm motion is captured in the non-storm-relative base reflectivity with a different relative motion (given a different angle of incidence to the site). Same tornado folks. In fairness, there was one single scan that looked "confusing", so if you just looked then you could go "hm what's going on", but subsequent scans, and playing them back with the prior ones, tell us the whole story. 

Great post. Obviously the survey will tell the whole story, but this a great analysis of the radar representation. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...