Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

The Post Christmas storm threat is still vey real


Damage In Tolland

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 1.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

I think it's clear that the folks on the Cape and nearby areas should be feeling verry comfortable at this point. I'm on the fringe here, so while I've got a dog in the hunt it's kinda old and only has three legs. After the 12z run, I hope anybody outside of those eastern most areas can refrain from unreasonable expectations. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst, and road trip to Phil's for a shoveling festival.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from that latest copy and paste of Don S's thoughts it doesn't sound like he's buying the bomb.

A nice phase is not a done deal

the option for the rug being pulled out from underneath us is still on the table and looks like a heck of a lot is riding on a Northern stream' strength and timing......when i step away from my weeniesm i have a hard time swallowing a low this deep as being modeled (at our latitude) by euro or gfs

The other reason for a tad of skeptisim is Usedtobe. He has a couple of posts where he obviously gives the euro credit as being a very good model....but says he notices a trend for it to over-phase. He mentioned this today.

So these are two reasons why i would not be suprised to see this crap the bed even this close in.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yea, which is qhy I'm going conservative and guessing 12:1 for my area; have to imagine they will be better than 10:1.

Unless it's a cipper fluff-bomb I pretty much always go 10:1 until I'm 24 hours out. Most of the time that can help compensate for overdone QPF totals (which happens more often than not on the models outside of convection). If it's clear we'll be ripping beautiful dendrites with temperatures 20s then I'll bump up (which you can't accurately forecast beyond 24 hours IMO). Even cold temperatures with bad dendritic growth can give you crappy ratios.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I consider myself fairly prudent wrt meteorology, but i was amazed when Pete Bouchard said today that the last time New England saw a "phased storm" was the 1993 superstorm.....doesn't phasing occur with most Nor'Easters (is this just Pete being Pete)? Everytime i see a major storm on the east cost, the two streams have come together and I consider that a phase, but is there more to it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

from that latest copy and paste of Don S's thoughts it doesn't sound like he's buying the bomb.

A nice phase is not a done deal

the option for the rug being pulled out from underneath us is still on the table and looks like a heck of a lot is riding on a Northern stream' strength and timing......when i step away from my weeniesm i have a hard time swallowing a low this deep as being modeled (at our latitude) by euro or gfs

The other reason for a tad of skeptisim is Usedtobe. He has a couple of posts where he obviously gives the euro credit as being a very good model....but says he notices a trend for it to over-phase. He mentioned this today.

So these are two reasons why i would not be suprised to see this crap the bed even this close in.

This is true, but I feel as though we have seen it correct for that over the course of the past 36 hrs worth of runs and the GFS now corroborates it.

As for the weenie low pressures, I agree, but I don't think that it's going to have to mean a further east track because it's 968mb as opposed to 958mb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless it's a cipper fluff-bomb I pretty much always go 10:1 until I'm 24 hours out. Most of the time that can help compensate for overdone QPF totals (which happens more often than not on the models outside of convection). If it's clear we'll be ripping beautiful dendrites with temperatures 20s then I'll bump up (which you can't accurately forecast beyond 24 hours IMO). Even cold temperatures with bad dendritic growth can give you crappy ratios.

This is true.....but I dnt think it' s stetch to hedge towards 12:1 is all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it's clear that the folks on the Cape and nearby areas should be feeling verry comfortable at this point. I'm on the fringe here, so while I've got a dog in the hunt it's kinda old and only has three legs. After the 12z run, I hope anybody outside of those eastern most areas can refrain from unreasonable expectations. Hope for the best, prepare for the worst, and road trip to Phil's for a shoveling festival.

disagree to a point

they should be most comfortabe out of everyone

but should 2 more cycle (12z tommorrow should they say the same things) then i would echo your thoughts ....stiill time for them to get stiffed as well. And i think everyone realizes this but from reading earlier pages from say 11am to 2pm i'm not sure they don't forget for a time. although that probability (of stiffing them) obviously decreases with every run

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I consider myself fairly prudent wrt meteorology, but i was amazed when Pete Bouchard said today that the last time New England saw a "phased storm" was the 1993 superstorm.....doesn't phasing occur with most Nor'Easters (is this just Pete being Pete)? Everytime i see a major storm on the east cost, the two streams have come together and I consider that a phase, but is there more to it?

He probably meant a triple phase, which this one was pretty close to as previously modeled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Was it supposed to dive that deep? I guess it is the northern stream we need to dig deep so as to get the heat involved that can build some ridging ahead of it.

yes, actually 18zgfs at 12 hours has that vort at 500 over south central new mexico, so looks legit to me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless it's a cipper fluff-bomb I pretty much always go 10:1 until I'm 24 hours out. Most of the time that can help compensate for overdone QPF totals (which happens more often than not on the models outside of convection). If it's clear we'll be ripping beautiful dendrites with temperatures 20s then I'll bump up (which you can't accurately forecast beyond 24 hours IMO). Even cold temperatures with bad dendritic growth can give you crappy ratios.

Haven't seen any bufkit numbers for BOS or the cape but pretty sure at any rate there will not be beautiful dendrites with just off the deck at mixing level 60 knots and on the Cape 75

Link to comment
Share on other sites

inland verbatim Euro Euro Ens/ GFS /ENS

what are the winds (ball park) for the 128-495 belt

are we talking 30 gusts 45 or higher? sorry if i missed this covered earlier

Ray mentioned the MB differential thou i didn't look at maps to see just how tightly packed it is but i have a wonderful memory of the 92 nor'easter and the power of the winds when i opened the screen door......would like to see that (winds) again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He probably meant a triple phase, which this one was pretty close to as previously modeled.

From his El Blogo Grande:

"...the problem is choice." Do they want to phase? And more importantly, are they TIMED to phase? It's like double dutch in jump rope - if someone's out of step, it's game over.

Now honestly, I haven't seen good, home-grown meterorological phasing since the Superstorm of 1993. This isn't anywhere near that kind of storm, but I just thought I'd throw that out. For these storms to phase, things almost have to be perfect. I'm thinking they won't be. Therefore, the chances at a big, gnarly storm that dumps a foot of snow with wind gusts to 50mph is a measly 40%. However, I still think we'll get some snow. And I still think the potential is for 6" in some spots. Those probabilities (of a storm dumping 6" of snow) are 75-80%.

And there you have it on this Christmas Eve Eve. Just like the anticipation for Santa, we'll wait to see if the storms merge. We won't know that until late Saturday evening, but at least I have enough info. to give you some details.

Anyone care to fill me in?

I have not been on too much since noonish...

Good, bad, ugly...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One fantastic night with Messenger at WWBB as we stayed up all night watching a 954 bomb destroy buoy after buoy, it was a compact little Ho. Great night though.

That's 28 .17 could be one of the lowest non trips ever if it made landfall

Was that the one the NWS (Walt?) was reading when they requested more buoys?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From his El Blogo Grande:

"...the problem is choice." Do they want to phase? And more importantly, are they TIMED to phase? It's like double dutch in jump rope - if someone's out of step, it's game over.

Now honestly, I haven't seen good, home-grown meterorological phasing since the Superstorm of 1993. This isn't anywhere near that kind of storm, but I just thought I'd throw that out. For these storms to phase, things almost have to be perfect. I'm thinking they won't be. Therefore, the chances at a big, gnarly storm that dumps a foot of snow with wind gusts to 50mph is a measly 40%. However, I still think we'll get some snow. And I still think the potential is for 6" in some spots. Those probabilities (of a storm dumping 6" of snow) are 75-80%.

And there you have it on this Christmas Eve Eve. Just like the anticipation for Santa, we'll wait to see if the storms merge. We won't know that until late Saturday evening, but at least I have enough info. to give you some details.

Anyone care to fill me in?

I have not been on too much since noonish...

Good, bad, ugly...

He must mean a perfect phase, then because most are ugly.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless it's a cipper fluff-bomb I pretty much always go 10:1 until I'm 24 hours out. Most of the time that can help compensate for overdone QPF totals (which happens more often than not on the models outside of convection). If it's clear we'll be ripping beautiful dendrites with temperatures 20s then I'll bump up (which you can't accurately forecast beyond 24 hours IMO). Even cold temperatures with bad dendritic growth can give you crappy ratios.

And good luck with maintaining fluff with 40+ mph winds. The crystals will be shredded.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm in moderate to High! And Harv has aged....

I remember talking to him by phone about a month after the 78 blizzard. I came into town to lament my fate for not being here for that fabulous event....THE signature snow event of the last century. So we got about 8 inches of snow in a system that was very much like recent ones....a left hook at the end. I was young....31 in March of 78 and was willing to go on very little sleep. When I spoke to Harvey, he commented on how lucky I was...a profession that was guaranteed to support me reasonably well vs meteorology. The rest is history, Harv probably earns in excess of what I do, and he's among the most respected TV mets around. Of course, I did fine in my own field.......but it's not the same as all of you snow obsessed weenies know...

It was really fun for a 10 year old growing up in Foxboro ... best snow forts eva!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

From his El Blogo Grande:

"...the problem is choice." Do they want to phase? And more importantly, are they TIMED to phase? It's like double dutch in jump rope - if someone's out of step, it's game over.

Now honestly, I haven't seen good, home-grown meterorological phasing since the Superstorm of 1993. This isn't anywhere near that kind of storm, but I just thought I'd throw that out. For these storms to phase, things almost have to be perfect. I'm thinking they won't be. Therefore, the chances at a big, gnarly storm that dumps a foot of snow with wind gusts to 50mph is a measly 40%. However, I still think we'll get some snow. And I still think the potential is for 6" in some spots. Those probabilities (of a storm dumping 6" of snow) are 75-80%.

And there you have it on this Christmas Eve Eve. Just like the anticipation for Santa, we'll wait to see if the storms merge. We won't know that until late Saturday evening, but at least I have enough info. to give you some details.

Anyone care to fill me in?

I have not been on too much since noonish...

Good, bad, ugly...

Probably just a bad choice of words, but I don't think I would describe a 40% chance of a foot of snow as "measley".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.

×
×
  • Create New...