Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February 18/19th Storm Potential


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, MN Transplant said:

And I have 7" to show for it.  The time spent per inch of snow ratio is...unfavorable.

yea...thats actually 7 inches more than you usually get...but yea.....there has been so many threats that the ratio is actually worse this year!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, jaydreb said:

It looks good, but isn’t the concern for the cities that temps are too warm at other levels besides 850?

Definitely.  That panel is wetter than 6z.  I am resigned to the fact that we will mix (and probably mix earlier than models suggest) but everything on the EPS looked a hair colder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, MN Transplant said:

And I have 7" to show for it.  The time spent per inch of snow ratio is...unfavorable.

I do wonder what the results this year would have been say 30 years ago in DC.  It’s a Nina with a generally mediocre pac base state irrespective of enso so expecting a 1996 or 2010 type result from the blocking would be ambitious in the least.  But up here for example, the results have at least been more in line with what you would expect from a great blocking winter with mediocre “other” factors. I’m very likely to end to above climo snowfall (only 5” away with a LOT of winter to go up here).  Unless we get a 1958 type finish it won’t rival the top 10% type winters but it’s likely to end up in that very good category just below that.  Obviously I do better then DC but I’m talking wrt climo. Historically when I finish above climo so does DC. I’ve noticed more of a decoupling of that in recent years though where not only do I do better in raw numbers but I also am doing much better wrt climo some years.   I wonder how much of that is the elephant in the room. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

The storm is becoming a two parter in a way. Maybe we can nail both parts.

Agreed....also, the start time seems to be getting earlier with the precip racing out in front and end time getting pushed back with that second part.  Getting close to a legit 20-24hours of snow for some areas.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, poolz1 said:

Agreed....also, the start time seems to be getting earlier with the precip racing out in front and end time getting pushed back with that second part.  Getting close to a legit 20-24hours of snow for some areas.

As long we don’t start trending towards some sort of redux of wave 1, wave 2, etc, I am all in for a good 20+ hours of winter weather (mostly snow I hope). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I believe this to be our best shot of the year. A lot going for us on this one, particularly the CAD and the upstream strength of the airmass, with good high position. Plenty of lift in the -10 to -20 layer and icing potential could be significant with temps in the 20s. Significant impacts to travel, power grid etc on this one. Not dealing with a transfer, marginal temps like the others. 

  • Like 29
  • Thanks 5
  • Weenie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ers-wxman1 said:

I believe this to be our best shot of the year. A lot going for us on this one, particularly the CAD and the upstream strength of the airmass, with good high position. Plenty of lift in the -10 to -20 layer and icing potential could be significant with temps in the 20s. Significant impacts to travel, power grid etc on this one. Not dealing with a transfer, marginal temps like the others. 

You've been bearish all year, so this is exciting to see. What are your thoughts on the NAM being quicker than everything else?

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

I do wonder what the results this year would have been say 30 years ago in DC.  It’s a Nina with a generally mediocre pac base state irrespective of enso so expecting a 1996 or 2010 type result from the blocking would be ambitious in the least.  But up here for example, the results have at least been more in line with what you would expect from a great blocking winter with mediocre “other” factors. I’m very likely to end to above climo snowfall (only 5” away with a LOT of winter to go up here).  Unless we get a 1958 type finish it won’t rival the top 10% type winters but it’s likely to end up in that very good category just below that.  Obviously I do better then DC but I’m talking wrt climo. Historically when I finish above climo so does DC. I’ve noticed more of a decoupling of that in recent years though where not only do I do better in raw numbers but I also am doing much better wrt climo some years.   I wonder how much of that is the elephant in the room. 

I think it's a super interesting topic, but it totally makes sense that even modest overall warming trends over the past ~30 years would trigger less frozen events in mediocre setups down around here. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...