HVSnowLover Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 9 minutes ago, jm1220 said: Comical differences on the models this close in. NAM essentially is all front end snow to sleet and most of the GFS snow is from a coastal storm. Yes this is becoming a nowcasting event, NAM and GFS are showing entirely different setups (I would probably slightly lean NAM at this range although Euro looked more GFS like) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadInTheClouds Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 7 minutes ago, White Gorilla said: GFS snow map? For our area with ratios GFS is 6-8 and V16 is 4-5. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Gorilla Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 20 minutes ago, HeadInTheClouds said: For our area with ratios GFS is 6-8 and V16 is 4-5. 4-8 is the go to range right now from the folks at Hudson Valley Weather and that seems spot on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HVSnowLover Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 CMC is now a miss with the coastal. I would lean NAM has the best handle right now but not super high confidence. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Gorilla Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 20 minutes ago, HVSnowLover said: CMC is now a miss with the coastal. I would lean NAM right now but not super high confidence. It's a complex setup with low model consensus as a result Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadInTheClouds Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 5 minutes ago, White Gorilla said: 4-8 is the go to range right now from the folks at Hudson Valley Weather and that seems spot on. I would basically go 4-6 for us. I can't see Albany going to a warning as it may not meet criteria. I could see a wwa for 4-7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crossbowftw3 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 Just now, HeadInTheClouds said: I would basically go 4-6 for us. I can't see Albany going to a warning as it may not meet criteria. I could see a wwa for 4-7. Criteria for warnings up here is still 8” if I’m not mistaken Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 Just now, crossbowftw3 said: Criteria for warnings up here is still 8” if I’m not mistaken 8” in 24 hours or 6” in 12 hours. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Juliancolton Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, crossbowftw3 said: Criteria for warnings up here is still 8” if I’m not mistaken 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HeadInTheClouds Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, crossbowftw3 said: Criteria for warnings up here is still 8” if I’m not mistaken I think its 7 in 12 hours or 9 in 24 but not 100% sure. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crossbowftw3 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, jm1220 said: 8” in 24 hours or 6” in 12 hours. 1 minute ago, Juliancolton said: There we go, these were what I was looking for Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nibor Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 2 minutes ago, EpicHECS said: I don't think 5" in 12 hours should warrant a warning in my county. 5" is nothing. So many jokes so little time. 1 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HVSnowLover Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 18 minutes ago, Brett said: It has to be very unusual that these models are disagreeing like this less than a day before a storm Model disagreement is nothing new, it's been better this winter for the most part this close to an event. The differences between the GFS and NAM for both tomorrow and Friday are laughable right now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kat5hurricane Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 26 minutes ago, jm1220 said: Snow always seems to start earlier than expected in these SWFE type storms. And always seems to change over quicker as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hudsonvalley21 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 33 minutes ago, White Gorilla said: GFS snow map? 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
White Gorilla Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 20 minutes ago, hudsonvalley21 said: Thanks. But the v16 is much less I hear 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 GFS v16 and CMC seem to be going toward the sheared mess idea that they had last night. I'm not buying either that the WAA snow push/thump would whiff south of us. I can't think of the last time that's happened. The "safe" guess for NYC right now would probably be 5-7" from this. But crazy differences between models this close in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem81 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 V16 Regular 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hudsonvalley21 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, White Gorilla said: Thanks. But the v16 is much less I hear Yea it is by a little, I would go with the NAM from today’s 18z runs and forward. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem81 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 The fact that these 2 maps are showing this discrepancy (look at DC area) this close is pretty concerning... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem81 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 UKMET also just cut precip in half... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Northof78 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 Hate to say it, but this is one of the more obvious outcome storms seen in a while 6-9" seems very high confidence for most of metro regardless of model almost Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikem81 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 Some call the SE ridge... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HVSnowLover Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, Northof78 said: Hate to say it, but this is one of the more obvious outcome storms seen in a while 6-9" seems very high confidence for most of metro regardless of model almost Yea I remember all the freaking out before the Sunday storm a few weeks ago with the models and their qpf and the immediate metro area all got the totals upton predicted if not more. Its hard to think a potentially long duration event with cold air in place won't get us to 6-9 inches one way or another. It's also hard to believe an overrunning setup like this won't get decent snow at least up to NYC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
winterwx21 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, mikem81 said: UKMET also just cut precip in half... 12z UKMET showing a nice 6 inch snowstorm for NYC. A few inches from the thursday thump, and a few inches from the prolonged lighter snow that lasts into friday. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HVSnowLover Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 8 minutes ago, mikem81 said: The fact that these 2 maps are showing this discrepancy (look at DC area) this close is pretty concerning... Poor DC. I think NAM will be closer to actual outcome Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jm1220 Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, EpicHECS said: Anyone think these 10"+ amounts in the Hudson Valley come to fruition? I wouldn’t worry unless you’re up by Albany maybe (being shut out, maybe not 10”). These snow events always seem to sneak their way north of what’s expected and you have the better ratios generally. I don’t see anything really shutting you out. There’s a good 700mb fetch of moisture that should push this north a good ways. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HVSnowLover Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, EpicHECS said: Anyone think these 7-11" amounts in the Hudson Valley come to fruition? Seems a little bullish, no? 7-11 might be pushing it but I think our whole subforum should get at least 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HVSnowLover Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 1 minute ago, EpicHECS said: 6" spread out isn't going to make a big difference. Nearly double that would be a slightly different story. It depends what happens with the overrunning. I think the coastal would be too far east to have major impact in the HV even if it happens. Unfortunately usually the coast has to at least ping for you guys to get the really good snows. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HVSnowLover Posted February 17, 2021 Share Posted February 17, 2021 3 minutes ago, EpicHECS said: Unless it's a monster, that's kind of true. And in some of our biggest snowfalls it was just flat out raining downtown. There have been exceptions, of course. This year we've had some nice events where we pinged but after huge front end thumps and you guys also got clobbered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now