jaydreb Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Such a narrow band of snow. Sheesh. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Wave 2 doesn’t seem to want to gain any latitude 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LP08 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Very narrow swatch of max accumulating snow. Nothing like the expanse of the euro. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaydreb Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 1 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baltosquid Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 FWIW, the 3km is further north than the 12km. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Steve25 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 4 minutes ago, losetoa6 said: Much wetter run through 72 What happened to Baltimore here? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weather Will Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 WB 12K NAM at 0Z Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetbulbs88 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 5 hours ago, Bob Chill said: I did want to add something serious. Every single time models have tossed around the idea of a long drawn out event with even steven rates/distribution etc over 48 hours or more... It NEVER ends up working out like that. One of these 2 waves will be dominant and the other may be a letdown. Just going off memory. Everyone knows what I'm rooting for and it still includes a foot of ice. ETA: I suppose one difference here is SLP is weak sauce. Not the same as a 1-2 punch where there's a "wake" left behind or the exiting system does weird things over the Atl and screws up the approach of the second. This whole thing is pretty unusual. I can't really think of any event similar in the last 15 years. May be "ok" to expect anomalous results. Good times. I’ve been thinking the same the whole time. I know it’s been brought up a thousand times but January 2011 is a good analog for that sort of dominance. A weaker wave passed and set up the bowling ball the following night. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Just now, psuhoffman said: Wave 2 doesn’t seem to want to gain any latitude Yeah. Its a pretty disappointing screw job for my area in all honesty. Light rates with the first half and a whiff south with the second. It is what it is. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
midatlanticweather Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Congrats @Ji east of the mountains! Lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 NAM improved with wave 1. Not sure it’s in useful range for wave 2 yet. 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 I wouldn’t worry too much about the blotchy nature of the nam precip depiction at this range. Should smooth out a bit as we near game time. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetbulbs88 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 5 minutes ago, clskinsfan said: Yeah. Its a pretty disappointing screw job for my area in all honesty. Light rates with the first half and a whiff south with the second. It is what it is. I don’t think this will resemble the final outcome. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 6 minutes ago, midatlanticweather said: Congrats @Ji east of the mountains! Lol. Sorta looks like that March 99 map Matt posted only a little north Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasnow215 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, Wetbulbs88 said: I don’t think this will resemble the final outcome. NAM at this range rarely does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 3 minutes ago, baltimoreguy said: So worried for you up until the moment of your inevitable jackpot I’m just analyzing the run. The second wave doesn’t gain any latitude. Not a forecast. Just a factual statement of this run. And Baltimore gets screwed by it so...think you would care about the observation. 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wasnow215 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 Can someone show ice accumulation for Central, Va from this 0z Nam run plz? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 1 minute ago, wasnow215 said: Can someone show ice accumulation for Central, Va from this 0z Nam run plz? Here ya go 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aldie 22 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 NAM has been a little bouncey with this one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesternFringe Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 9 minutes ago, jaydreb said: Such a narrow band of snow. Sheesh. And yet I am still barely out if it an at my elevation of 1550’ NW of Staunton. I will take my chances, given my local climo, and also give a bit more weight to the Euro than the NAM for the medium timeframe (until Friday). I think I see a decent amount of accumulating snow, and that makes this former Yankee very happy. Big picture is we are all tracking snow. Lucky us! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 18 minutes ago, psuhoffman said: NAM improved with wave 1. Not sure it’s in useful range for wave 2 yet. Lol, we can be sure 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wetbulbs88 Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 11 minutes ago, wasnow215 said: NAM at this range rarely does. Yeah especially for the second wave at this pointYeah especially for the second wave at this point 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterWxLuvr Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 1 minute ago, WxUSAF said: Lol, we can be sure For both waves actually. Seriously Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WesternFringe Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 11 minutes ago, snowfan said: Here ya go I thank you for posting it, but without the key or legend it is really difficult to see what it is depicting other than relative amounts. Which is probably all that is important in the end given that these model depictions will bust one way or another. Carry on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baltosquid Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 RGEM looks a bit south with the first wave compared to 18z, best precip at DC latitude. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 NAM has been a little bouncey with this oneEvery model is giving us 6-10 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
clskinsfan Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 RGEM with the Winchester screwjob in the first wave as well. OKV is the new DCA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowfan Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 RGEM = .5 and . 3 for DC and Baltimore, respectively, for wave 1. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted February 9, 2021 Share Posted February 9, 2021 2nd wave on 00z RGEM stays south of DC through 78... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts