Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Feb 7th discussion/obs


The Iceman
 Share

Recommended Posts

34 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

It wouldn't be right if I didn't voice my concerns. No doubt per the mesos there will be insane f gen lifting and banding of precip in far SE PA and across the river into parts of NJ. However, as is evident on the mesos, BL temps are an issue going into this. Some areas are going to start as sleet or even plain rain (and likely struggle for a bit to flip). Now, most guidance suggests under the heavier banding that temps mix down to the BL and flip to snow quickly. My concern is what happens alongside the heavier banding? We usually see subsidence and lighter rates. That is a concern. Whatever spots fall under subsidence and don't get into the heavier banding are going to struggle to accumulate. I wouldn't be surprised to see some isolated spots only seeing a slushy inch or so where 10 miles away they have 5"+ of paste. Going to be interesting to watch unfold, but I think those concerns are legit going in. Someone is going to get screwed while up the road the get a golden shovel. Keep your expectations low for this one and hope for the best lift to occur over your house.

Totally agree on all points. I think a narrow 20-25 mile wide area will get 4-6"+ of mashed potatoes under the intense banding but it won't be widespread at all. 1-3" on the grass(snow) would be my guess for most. 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

thinking LV should be raised to WSW minimum though  but based on current road conditions from past snow event, Mt Holly should really consider it based on the noon model run now. I still have 2 feet and more on the ground and plows will have difficulty even maneuvering in the heavier snow bands with limited visibility. The  Nam 12k shows over 6 in now- thats pretty reliable at this range. The NW tick is surprising many . I think Tuesdays storm will do the same too.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM QPF is overdone...but better thermals to the N and W will even out from PHL to NW of fall line in my view. That said I am still concerned that where the heaviest precip or banding is could lose a bit more at the start....again why a more blended approach like the NWS P&C has makes a lot of sense to me

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This map says to me that nws isn't confident at all for tomorrow. I know it's the low end amount but usually when we are under winter storm warnings this map shows like the bare minimum to qualify for those warnings, like 4". This says to me, there's a pretty large chance at a bust due to the BL issues and they aren't really confident in their winter storm warnings.

 

SnowAmt10Prcntl.png

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, MGorse said:

Looks like more guidance showing light rain to start from I-95 east. Also, current temperatures just about at today’s forecast highs already in southern NJ and it is only 10:30 AM. 

Trenton is above it's forecast high as well at 1130. Almost 45 there. 41 up here in Hopewell. Seems like any time the sun is blasting anymore and there isn't a north wind, we just warm up super fast.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Wentzadelphia said:

3” is my goal in northeast Philly. Well see. Just to see some heavy snow for an hour would be cool. 

That is my goal for this storm too. 3" with a hour or 2 of fat heavy flakes. Definitely a hard storm to nail down since it is all going to come down to banding with how borderline thermals are. Better to aim low and be pleasantly surprised than vice versa.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This kind of reminds me of a storm back in March 18. Most areas got a sloppy 1-2 inches while a very small area got like 10 inches. I remember it very well because I was in Newtown Square and we had about 10 inches while down the road people only had 1-2 inches.


.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, The Iceman said:

This map says to me that nws isn't confident at all for tomorrow. I know it's the low end amount but usually when we are under winter storm warnings this map shows like the bare minimum to qualify for those warnings, like 4". This says to me, there's a pretty large chance at a bust due to the BL issues and they aren't really confident in their winter storm warnings.

 

SnowAmt10Prcntl.png

I mean, as I said last night in reply to Ralph's post asking if anyone thought there was room to bust...I'll repeat, there is. That said, for a modest event like this, really the absolute lowest snow amount that qualifies for a WSW (5"): https://www.weather.gov/phi/WinterWx

New_12hour_WSW_Criteria_2015-16.png

(Note-- above map is for a *12* hour event)...your low end estimate is going to be low somewhat often. It's unlikely the region on the whole sees <1". It is quite possible we end up with more spots getting advisory level snow totals though than warning. This will be a dynamics battle: cooling from the strong fgen, versus marginal bl temps and an eh airmass. Round 1, ding ding. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Moderately Unstable said:

I mean, as I said last night in reply to Ralph's post asking if anyone thought there was room to bust...I'll repeat, there is. That said, for a modest event like this, really the absolute lowest snow amount that qualifies for a WSW (5"): https://www.weather.gov/phi/WinterWx

New_12hour_WSW_Criteria_2015-16.png

(Note-- above map is for a *12* hour event)...your low end estimate is going to be low somewhat often. It's unlikely the region on the whole sees <1". It is quite possible we end up with more spots getting advisory level snow totals though than warning. This will be a dynamics battle: cooling from the strong fgen, versus marginal bl temps and an eh airmass. Round 1, ding ding. 

It triggers me that nw chester isn't in light blue. It's like they should continue the border from berks count to the east west median in Chester. We are used to getting snow in French creek, elverson, pheonixville, Bucktown, malvern, pottstown, Coventryville, Nantahala, chestersprings....we can handle it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Iceman said:

This map says to me that nws isn't confident at all for tomorrow. I know it's the low end amount but usually when we are under winter storm warnings this map shows like the bare minimum to qualify for those warnings, like 4". This says to me, there's a pretty large chance at a bust due to the BL issues and they aren't really confident in their winter storm warnings.

 

SnowAmt10Prcntl.png

Just keep in mind that is probabilities based and is auto generated based on many models with using our deterministic forecast as the mode. But yeah lots could go wrong with this system. 

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, zenmsav6810 said:

It triggers me that nw chester isn't in light blue. It's like they should continue the border from berks count to the east west median in Chester. We are used to getting snow in French creek, elverson, pheonixville, Bucktown, malvern, pottstown, Coventryville, Nantahala, chestersprings....we can handle it. 

That was basically to match up with Lancaster County in NWS State Colleges area. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...