Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,794
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Familoer
    Newest Member
    Familoer
    Joined

Quick Hitter Coastal Threat, Feb 7-8th


The 4 Seasons
 Share

Recommended Posts

  On 2/4/2021 at 6:18 PM, OceanStWx said:

Soon we'll be offering Brian congratulations. 

Expand  

Definitely think the sensitivity (also) here is related to the orientation of the N/ stream SPV pearling going on N of the Lakes to the western/lower Maritime.  Ubiquitous ...even subtle backing off on the suppressive nature in how that is integrating everywhere ( really ..) ... immediately evinces the incredible baroclinic potency - it's like under constant pressure, and as that backs off.. metaphor slowly unscrewing a cap and we hiss our way into a flat wave NJ Model low type in step.. 

The ICON - obviously you know all this gunk ... - was back well off that SPV aspect a few cycles ago and had a pretty impressive short duration albeit major impact, and another 3 degs of lat/lon relaxation may bring those robuster solutions back to the discussion, another 6 and we open wave-style fast moving bomb.  

It's really a blessed time for multi subforum interests ... to be relayed into another focus in such short order to the last.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 6:25 PM, Baroclinic Zone said:

Since Kevin is confused most of the time.

Here are the 700mb temps and VV to point out what I am saying. 

Thermal gradient is about 20mi offshore co-aligned with the VV.

1407739688_Screenshot2021-02-04131800.thumb.png.664ea6208161fd56e98785fdbff19a3b.png

229202266_Screenshot2021-02-04131844.thumb.png.1b505c05e821a03b3ced7012e74d8491.png

Expand  

No the confusion emojis are directed at the poster. Meaning they are confused 

  • Haha 2
  • Confused 2
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 6:25 PM, Baroclinic Zone said:

Since Kevin is confused most of the time.

Here are the 700mb temps and VV to point out what I am saying. 

Thermal gradient is about 20mi offshore co-aligned with the VV.

1407739688_Screenshot2021-02-04131800.thumb.png.664ea6208161fd56e98785fdbff19a3b.png

229202266_Screenshot2021-02-04131844.thumb.png.1b505c05e821a03b3ced7012e74d8491.png

Expand  

Yeah where you see those isotherms packed, you'd prob get a weenie band displaced NW of that...esp in a very tilted system like this one. The key is getting it close enough so the realy good band gets over land. It might get the Cape on this run (even though it doesn't directly show it on QPF)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 7:37 PM, weathafella said:

They should do a median-much better representative especially with an n of low numbers like gefs. It even 51 can have one member skew the mea too much.

Expand  

wow, just trying to think how I would do that and the math gets very complicated on the global scale.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 2/4/2021 at 7:28 PM, Henry's Weather said:

image.png.231368b1dc0c69184983911514b72161.png

image.png.bc9c9e24bd83151eeb11e26594591017.png

Expand  

Oh right - duh ... heh - sorry

Forgot about this product. 

Yeah, so...again, like the GEFs - the spread appears to be over the NW arc.  Man, that'd be a hoot: that 975 mb near Cape Ann -

The thing is we actually want to watch the SB ...not just having to know the SB in airing while we're in the dark cuz a dystopian cryo bomb's going off in the area.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...