Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Jan 31 - Feb 1 Event - STORM MODE THREAD


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Wonderdog said:

Just remember, it's a Miller B. 

That’s why I liked the euro runs with a weaker coastal that went E rather than NE up the coast from our latitude. Wasn’t a blockbuster but it was clean. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

NAM 500 trough is swinging across positively tilted and the upper low is closed, but the best forcing is generally north of where the closed circulation crosses. Trough needs to swing across neutral or even a bit negative tilt. Coastal does not get captured or tuck where it needs to and we torch, stay out of the CCB. 
E166091E-8A20-45A1-A13F-EEF62D3A8537.thumb.jpeg.25575d5c2aa757c4c273a209a71eead7.jpeg

At least it’s just the nam


.
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There will probably be some drizzle and freezing drizzle once the dry slot rolls in. Could be an extended period of it too. The reason is that cloud top temps warm above -10C as the dry slot erodes it away, leaving no very few ice crystals available for snow formation. Still plenty of moisture underneath that and some background lift though, so there will be drizzle. That's going to be an issue until/unless the coastal low can set up a reasonable def. zone and ccb to remoisten the column.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Eskimo Joe said:

IMO, LWX's new snow map is decent but given the NAMs being bad for us, I don't see it going any higher.

I was just thinking that it’s interesting when the pros see things one way and weenies see it another. I can’t say for certain but I highly doubt they are hanging their forecast on the NAMfrom this range

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, DCAlexandria said:


At least it’s just the nam


.

Attention should be paid to it. The NAM even beyond 48 hours can give insight into how the smaller details may be evolving. Guidance is guidance. We shouldn’t look at it’s QPF verbatim, but more so to understand it’s evolution.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WinterWxLuvr said:

I was just thinking that it’s interesting when the pros see things one way and weenies see it another. I can’t say for certain but I highly doubt they are hanging their forecast on the NAMfrom this range

This. 

I'm sure Lwx isn't second guessing there snow map because of a NAM run from 48 hours out. Lol.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ers-wxman1 said:

Attention should be paid to it. The NAM even beyond 48 hours can give insight into how the smaller details may be evolving. Guidance is guidance. We shouldn’t look at it’s QPF verbatim, but more so to understand it’s evolution.

       Correct.    Everyone laughed back in December when the NAM was the first model to show that storm coming much further west and ruining chances for heavy snow along the I-95 corridor.     That doesn't at all mean that it's correct now, but to completely dismiss it at this stage comes with risk.

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, high risk said:

       Correct.    Everyone laughed back in December when the NAM was the first model to show that storm coming much further west and ruining chances for heavy snow along the I-95 corridor.     That doesn't at all mean that it's correct now, but to completely dismiss it at this stage comes with risk.

You and I are on the same page, NAM kept bumping that mix line NW and folks just laughed it off until it became clear things were going that way. Also wanted to say that somehow when I quoted this post it added a ''laugh'' reaction and I can't change it because I hit my limit for the day. Weird.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, high risk said:

       Correct.    Everyone laughed back in December when the NAM was the first model to show that storm coming much further west and ruining chances for heavy snow along the I-95 corridor.     That doesn't at all mean that it's correct now, but to completely dismiss it at this stage comes with risk.

What was odd was the mslp actually improved slightly but the storm had a “blown out” look to it and never wrapped back up. Very odd to have a captured tucked low off OC and all the precip is up in PA.  

ETA: ehh on second look the low gets captured further north then I thought on first glacé. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

Holy cow is that a good run. Snows forever on the back side. Expanded the deform significantly also like the euro did. 

Hope we don't see this creep north with each run though. IMO, by 12z tomorrow we'll probably know if we're looking at a low end warning event or if something special is coming down the pike. Having flashbacks from December.

  • Like 5
  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...