Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Jan 31 - Feb 2 Storm


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, BristowWx said:

One of them will have to budge.  Not sure which.  GFS seems entrenched with no capitulation 

In regards to last event, it took the GFS about 90 to 96 hours to completely cave. Before then it was losing support, much like what is happening now. Even then the solution doesn't seem to bad, all models agree on the WAA aspect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, stormtracker said:

As long as the Euro/CMC combo hold, I'm not going to fret about the GFS being stubborn.  Now if one of those others move, then yeah....

Yeah, I'm kind of in this camp of thinking right now.  Can't fret too much.  But it is stubbornly consistent which is concerning (annoying?)...and don't much like seeing the light rain/drizzle from about Sunday afternoon through Monday morning, essentially.  We'll see how things evolve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WxUSAF said:

Don't tease me like that, share!

#1 is uninspiring. The rest though!!!!!!:o

78C43C55-A663-4BC0-B0ED-8FD499828CB0.png.21f9d199e3710ec552c2fcc415e28bcc.png

58674D86-6620-4E10-A626-A333AE8F3B20.thumb.png.87f59919023baf7bc2edd8e49d8252f2.png

wrt the 2015 top analog. That system was a close match wrt h5 but it had absolutely no southern stream interaction unlike this setup which is a major difference. It was a pure NS miller B. There also was not even close to the same blocking leading up to that. It was all pac driven. I would this this setup is more favorable wrt the progression getting to that end result there. On the other hand if I’m being totally forthcoming the setup is slightly less favorable due to the initial wave coming across further north, then those other analogs like 2016/1996/1983.  So I think expectations should be kept under hecs but that shows there is huge upside here and at the least a very good storm is possible if not likely. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, stormtracker said:

As long as the Euro/CMC combo hold, I'm not going to fret about the GFS being stubborn.  Now if one of those others move, then yeah....

And it would be a bit mind- boggling if the euro or cmc would cave, wouldn't it? I mean how much of a window can we reasonably expect this divergence to continue? I woulda thought is the Euro was gonna cave we'd start seeing that today, no?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cobalt said:

GFS still decides to stall a band of light-mod snow over the DC area from the costal/ULL. Weak for sure, but it's an improvement in that department

gfs-deterministic-md-precip_24hr_inch-2267200.thumb.png.39d557d99aac97f3584e863598d4e232.png

gfs-deterministic-md-snow_96hr_inch-2321200.thumb.png.9540cff0f4ed1568390f1893021fbd6b.png

10:1 because Kuchera is contaminated by pervious event in some regions. 

Ninja'd

 

That's an odd trajectory for that band...not that I'm complaining

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Para took a step toward the Euro idea IMO. Despite a similar H5 look to the op GFS early on, the CAD is better represented (which should be the case with the para's finer vertical resolution). This feeds back to a stronger, earlier coastal development. Need that H5 to come across a bit further south to really be in business.

eta: The low still escapes east - I was just comparing the H96-108 evolution. Also, seems to be setting up a repeat scenario D7-8.

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...