Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

Jan 31 - Feb 2 Storm


stormtracker
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, osfan24 said:

Maybe it's just been so long since we tracked a potential MECS/HECS, but I just remember 2016 seeming so locked in from basically a week out and just insane snowfall totals and qpf amounts really far out. You would just think such a long duration coastal, as this is depicted, would be showing at least equally obscene totals, if not more.

This is not going to be 2016 imo.  This could be a big storm but that was historic. If you are expecting 2016 then you are setting yourself up for disappointment.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Before I get flooded with “don’t worry” I don’t think this misses. We’re now inside the range the euro went way south with previous storms.  And even if it adjusts south some it might come back north a little at the very end. It’s doing that now with tonight’s snow down in NC and south VA.   I think we’re pretty close to the final solution on the euro. It’s pretty locked in with only some wobbles on the EPS the last 36 hours.  But the bigger threat to a total fail is still suppressed imo if your north of DC.  Doesn’t mean I expect that fail. 

Suppression has been the worry with every storm since December. I don’t think this is that same animal. I think this is do we get the transfer soon/fast enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, H2O said:

This simply isn’t true. 96 and 2016 had zero change over. It is possible to have a wrapped storm and still be cold smoke. Yesterday’s euro was almost ideal for 80% of the area. That would be how both things can be true. Mountains get a lot and the coastal plain as well. 
 

What we saw today generally only favored the usual areas. And that was over the mini melt about it being too suppressed. Now it’s a serious risk for primary too far NW into Ohio which crushes thermals. We don’t need more tucked. Then too much of the area floods. 
 

It’s a bit much to imply the ONLY way to get the best snow is to say every storm HAS to sit on top of VA Beach when that is fraught with issues elsewhere. 

1996 is the first storm I remember and we definitely had a period of sleet and I was just west of 95 in the Baltimore area.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, jaydreb said:

This is not going to be 2016 imo.  This could be a big storm but that was historic. If you are expecting 2016 then you are setting yourself up for disappointment.  

Was just throwing out the most recent of our big storms. Could throw out 2009, 2010, 2003, 2000, etc. I just remember big qpf totals really far out for 2016, and that storm was only 24 hours. This could be 1.5 to almost 2 times that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, H2O said:

This simply isn’t true. 96 and 2016 had zero change over. It is possible to have a wrapped storm and still be cold smoke. Yesterday’s euro was almost ideal for 80% of the area. That would be how both things can be true. Mountains get a lot and the coastal plain as well. 
 

What we saw today generally only favored the usual areas. And that was over the mini melt about it being too suppressed. Now it’s a serious risk for primary too far NW into Ohio which crushes thermals. We don’t need more tucked. Then too much of the area floods. 
 

It’s a bit much to imply the ONLY way to get the best snow is to say every storm HAS to sit on top of VA Beach when that is fraught with issues elsewhere. 

96 I changed to sleet all the way in Herndon. Wasn’t a big deal mostly light in the dry slot. 2016 the extreme dry slot prevented mixing since there was no precip during the mid level warm intrusion but the effect was the same, places southeast of 95 didn’t get the 30”+ totals NW did. I think your misunderstanding me. I’m not saying places like DC and Annapolis and EZF can’t get a lot of snow from a HECS where Winchester and I do. They can. But if the western end northern parts are getting big hits they are probably flirting with a dry slot and some sleet.  For the deform to set up along the coastal plain (where there is no oragraphic aid also) it likely means a rapid drop off in totals NW of 95. Those are very rare but happen. The knickerbocker storm is an example.  That gave DC 28” of pure snow but it wasn’t that big up here or in Winchester. Totals dropped off rapidly NW of 95.  If we want a true forum wide 1 foot plus places southeast of 95 probably can’t Jack and will flirt with dry slot or mix. Otherwise the NW 1/2 of the forum will get left out. That’s simply climo on these type storms. Of course everyone should root for the most snow in their yard. If you Jack and I get 3” so be it. I won’t hate on ya. I’m just pointing out what the typical outcome is. 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, osfan24 said:

1996 is the first storm I remember and we definitely had a period of sleet and I was just west of 95 in the Baltimore area.

Lived just inside the beltway here in Va and it was powder here. Where I live now has mixed for PD 2 and 2010. But a couple others during prime climo managed to stay powder and still be warning + events

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

96 I changed to sleet all the way in Herndon. Wasn’t a big deal mostly light in the dry slot. 2016 the extreme dry slot prevented mixing since there was no precip during the mid level warm intrusion but the effect was the same, places southeast of 95 didn’t get the 30”+ totals NW did. I think your misunderstanding me. I’m not saying places like DC and Annapolis and EZF can’t get a lot of snow from a HECS where Winchester and I do. They can. But if the western end northern parts are getting big hits they are probably flirting with a dry slot and some sleet.  For the deform to set up along the coastal plain (where there is no oragraphic aid also) it likely means a rapid drop off in totals NE of 95. Those are very rare but happen. The knickerbocker storm is an example.  That gave DC 28” of pure snow but it wasn’t that big up here or in Winchester. Totals dropped off rapidly NW of 95.  If we want a true forum wide 1 foot plus places southeast of 95 probably can’t Jack and will flirt with dry slot or mix. Otherwise the NW 1/2 of the forum will get left out. That’s simply climo on these type storms. Of course everyone should root for the most snow in their yard. If you Jack and I get 3” so be it. I won’t hate on ya. I’m just pointing out what the typical outcome is. 

Don’t want to contribute to banter but I’m in Annapolis and the afternoon for the storm in 2016 was brutal as we dry slotted and the sun came out while it bombed to the north. Tough.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, H2O said:

Lived just inside the beltway here in Va and it was powder here. Where I live now has mixed for PD 2 and 2010. But a couple others during prime climo managed to stay powder and still be warning + events

It’s possible you dry slotted before the mid level warm intrusion in 96. But sleet did make it as far NW as IAD.  The dryslot is caused by the same function as the mixing. The mid level warm intrusion also often times up with the dry slot because it signals the rapid WAA has ended (the cold has been displaced) and so you get light or no precip. Whether it’s sleet or just dry doesn’t make a difference to snow totals lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That tucked in look is what concerns me as it relate to places east of 95 and including the metros. Just my common sense "analysis" based on decades of living in the region and from being on this board. I have seen this movie before to some extent. Of course I am hoping for the "best" outcome for everyone.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

It’s possible you dry slotted before the mid level warm intrusion in 96. But sleet did make it as far NW as IAD.  The dryslot is caused by the same function as the mixing. The mid level warm intrusion also often times up with the dry slot because it signals the rapid WAA has ended (the cold has been displaced) and so you get light or no precip. Whether it’s sleet or just dry doesn’t make a difference to snow totals lol. 

Had a brief period where sleet mixed in mostly during dry slot in Reisterstown.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Baltimorewx said:

I thought the 2010 twin storms were pretty well modeled

The only major DC snowstorm of past 15 years or so that I recall being not well-modeled ahead of time and kind of sneaking up on us, was the December 2009 storm.  I recall even on the Thursday on the day before the storm, the morning forecasts were still for maybe 4 to 8 inches. And by afternoon, it was looking like 8 to 12 inches. And then that the evening, less than 24 hours before the snow started, forecasts started hinting at a foot plus 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, real said:

The only major DC snowstorm of past 15 years or so that I recall being not well-modeled ahead of time and kind of sneaking up on us, was the December 2009 storm.  I recall even on the Thursday on the day before the storm, the morning forecasts were still for maybe 4 to 8 inches. And by afternoon, it was looking like 8 to 12 inches. And then that the evening, less than 24 hours before the snow started, forecasts started hinting at a foot plus 

That storm started showing bug totals about 3 days out 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

wrt PSU's suppression concerns. I've put the 18z EPS low clusters over where the 12z op's low pressure tracked (you can tell where the op's low is since it's L is slightly bigger), and it's certainly in the west (maybe not NW) camp compared to the mean. Still looks really really good, with room to adjust.

788d69ade8fc417f03056b6825427e4e.thumb.png.f12686e4c09deb508d8648e2f54e4789.png

Sorry if the image looking super blurry is a bad thing but that's the best I could do to display the two runs on top of each other. Google slides ftw in that department. 

  • Like 6
  • Thanks 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Man I’m an idiot. My cache was loading yesterday’s eps. 18z looked amazing. Sorry. Still think suppression is more a risk but it’s becoming less of one. Frankly it’s hard to see how we don’t get at least a decent snow from this.  Carry on. 

After further review the call on the ice has been overturned. We have a good goal.  :)

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Man I’m an idiot. My cache was loading yesterday’s eps. 18z looked amazing. Sorry. Still think suppression is more a risk but it’s becoming less of one. Frankly it’s hard to see how we don’t get at least a decent snow from this.  Carry on. 

That's hilarious. I thought you had snapped...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WinterWxLuvr said:

That storm started showing bug totals about 3 days out 

I don't recall that, but perhaps no one seriously believed it, because it was still mid-December (and was hesitant to believe we could get a record  December snowfall). Also by that point it had been 6 years since we had a big storm DC, so people may have just been extremely skeptical it was possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that has also changed, due to Internet access and better modeling, etc, is forecasters in DC region used to be extremely skeptical of ever saying more than a foot of snow was possible, until literally a day before hand.  Even PD11, I think it was well into Friday (before a storm that hit Saturday night), that most common folks even had any idea that a major storm of more than 6 to 8 inches was coming.   The legacy and trauma of being burnt bad on the big 2000 East Coast bust was real and long-lasting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...