Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,592
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Manpower
    Newest Member
    Manpower
    Joined

Watching closely .. February 1-3rd for moderate to major coastal event


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

22 minutes ago, ScottieBird said:

BOX corrected its forecast. It's obvious a senior forecaster cleaned the mess up. Maybe someone was bombed during the overnight shift? I'm expecting 2 to 4 in Newport. A far cry from the odious forecast this AM of 8-12. This storm kinda reminds me of a Feburary 1995 snow event.

They expressed the uncertainty in the discussion, and there's been wide model variance especially in this area.  I wouldn't want to be them, you're being more than a little harsh, especially since some models (and I don't believe them) are showing those amounts, still.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Nice collage and effort here !

no not trying to nit pick ( seriously ...) but I have such vivid memories of the week leading and throughout that 1996 event to confidently argue, it is/was really only similar to what is presently modeled,  as it landed on the EC in that 7am window of the 8th that year.  The frames leading got there differently and I that very much matters in my mind -  what that sort of signifies to me is this storm is relatively unique of that's 96 variant is a top dawg comparison - although that QPF distribution (presently...) looks similar.   

1996 was a close roller that ran into a cold loaded damming event ... This is closing and deepening in the other direction - just sayn'

But I do think hemispheric and "super synoptic"  ( mean synergistic effects ) this system is rather unique. It's formulating in the R-wave seam ... which is why it is moving so slow.  The one 1996 was in a slower medium/flow rate.   Perhaps it doesn't matter "how" we get there - agreed... I mean it is what it is.  If it does similarly when it's there who is gonna care. Lol. But, ... this one I think has a bit of dark uncertainty to it because of that "Lagrangian" wave space.

The thump "Lagrangian"s its way through in like 10 hours...I mean, if that is slow, WTF is fast?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, NeonPeon said:

They expressed the uncertainty in the discussion, and there's been wide model variance especially in this area.  I wouldn't want to be them, you're being more than a little harsh, especially since some models (and I don't believe them) are showing those amounts, still.

Not often people, with their first post, epically meltdown. Kudos to him, he will fit in well with weeping whiners.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, It's Always Sunny said:

That's what she said.

People keep ogling over stall this, capture, crawl, lagrangian....PS: 10 hour burst, then some sprinkles. Yea, I get that the stall doesn't happen in a great spot for us, and the dynamics wane, but it's frustrating as hell. Not to mention whacking it to your 8SD NAO block and -10 wind chills, as you prep the rain gauge. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...