Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,609
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Watching closely .. February 1-3rd for moderate to major coastal event


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

Here's H7 on the NAM:

image.png.2e550344ebdc4938d7fa5b8afe41ac2c.png

Here's H85 (with an emphasis too on temperature gradient as well as the strength of inflow)

image.png.53f4ee1d963428b4f7a04a03ba0fdbec.png

 

ULJ 

this should favor large scale lift

image.png.9d7e5abb4719a7eec70ac3c80427910a.png

 

All of this would point towards a pretty monster band forming with more than sufficient QPF (despite what models are outputting). I actually feel very good about here in CT (though going to have to account for some dry air concerns when composing the forecast) 

but there are plenty of good looks (and of course some negatives) but I will gladly take alot of what's being modeled

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Every guidance has a pa to nj jack with a secondary max in ema. Gotta believe it to a certain extent, for now. 

The NYC area to the west always seems to have the same result in snowfall distro and intensity. East NE wind picking up ocean and LI sound moisture and dumping. Same for e mass. Wind over land for CT so lot less except immediate coast and far SW?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Muthhafukker

KLEW   GFSX MOS GUIDANCE   1/29/2021  1200 UTC                       
 FHR  24  36| 48  60| 72  84| 96 108|120 132|144 156|168 180|192      
      SAT 30| SUN 31| MON 01| TUE 02| WED 03| THU 04| FRI 05|SAT CLIMO
 N/X  -1  19| -3  28|  4  29| 18  29| 20  35| 18  36| 21  39| 26 11 31
 TMP   1  10| -1  17|  7  23| 21  26| 22  26| 21  30| 25  34| 27      
 DPT -10  -8| -9   0|  1  13| 13  19| 15  15| 15  20| 20  25| 21      
 CLD  PC  CL| CL  CL| CL  CL| OV  OV| OV  CL| PC  PC| OV  OV| OV      
 WND  11  10|  5   4|  2  12| 13  15| 14  15|  4   6|  6   7|  9      
 P12   1   0|  2   1|  3   5| 37  39| 22   3|  8  14| 46  50| 31999999
 P24       1|      2|      6|     53|     22|     19|     55|      999
 Q12   0   0|  0   0|  0   0|  1   1|  0   0|  0   0|       |         
 Q24       0|      0|      0|      2|      0|      0|       |         
 T12   0   0|  0   0|  0   0|  0   1|  1   0|  0   1|  0   1|  0      
 T24        |  0    |  0    |  1    |  1    |  1    |  1    |  5      
 PZP   4   3|  4   2|  4   4|  9   7|  8   9|  8   8| 19  11|  4      
 PSN  96  97| 96  98| 96  95| 82  88| 89  78| 77  66| 41  24| 32      
 PRS   0   0|  0   0|  0   0|  5   5|  2  11|  6  16| 10   9| 10      
 TYP   S   S|  S   S|  S   S|  S   S|  S   S|  S   S|  Z   R| RS      
 SNW       0|      0|      0|      8|      1|      0|       |  
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

Euro was kind of east in the mid-Atlantic. Didn’t have the PA jack. More like SE NJ

Do you think this recent cold blast could actually work to keep the baroclinic zone farther south or depending on how the re-development occurs/when would that work to bump it back north a bit? 

I still think the band is being way underdone...hell, there is even a strong signal for dynamic cooling aloft...that would further intensify the temp. gradient. Hell, look at 925...as warm as +8 to +9 C inflow with 925's actually cooling through the day down to around -9 to -10 in central New England. This is one helluva banding signal. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, weatherwiz said:

Do you think this recent cold blast could actually work to keep the baroclinic zone farther south or depending on how the re-development occurs/when would that work to bump it back north a bit? 

I still think the band is being way underdone...hell, there is even a strong signal for dynamic cooling aloft...that would further intensify the temp. gradient. Hell, look at 925...as warm as +8 to +9 C inflow with 925's actually cooling through the day down to around -9 to -10 in central New England. This is one helluva banding signal. 

so essentially, warm, moist air off the ocean via storm circulation running into cold, dry air causes more instability?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...