Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Watching closely .. February 1-3rd for moderate to major coastal event


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

It occurs to me looking over this 12z ICON ...which I'll use to demo a discussion point(s) because I'm detecting it also among all the other guidance, frankly.

It has to do with the handling of the mid .. U/A closing features wrt to the surface reflection ... 

The 12z Tuesday position of all illustrates a deep layer quasi closing 500 mb center that is well west of an broadly opened pressure basin ... That open space appears to have several meso-beta-scaled lows whirling around inside an open region. 

That is not a captured low ...  That schism is typical of a systemic detachment.  It could be convective over selling... But, a stronger, deeper closing 500 mb ( deeper than struggling beneath 540 dm), would do wonders to focus.

Frankly, this system still looks like it has from the get go to me - a protracted moderate winter storm, and I do think it snows more than rains west of the immediate climo coastal zones...  Obviously across the life-cycle, pulse or two of isolated heavy cannot be ruled out..but the by-and-large distinction is not a major player.  

It is, however, possible to approach major impact by virtue of duration culminating - that's the storm zealot/enthusiasts best pathway to salvation the way this stands now.

What needs to improve to bring irresponsible lust for destruction and dystopia over the top ( lol ):   

This also still is a whopper hemispherically supportive scaffolding, in the sense that the +PNAP ( and by the way ... the PNA looks now more properly involved, and that makes this whole ordeal more H.A. in nature ..) is blossoming western heights, while a vestigial/collapsing -NAO westerly limb blocking node is pivoting SE through the lower Maritime region. That is pinning a neggie node near us...  What is somewhat lacking in all this, is that in situ S/W mechanical feed-in isn't ( thus far in guidance ..) nearly as equally impressive. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

It occurs to me looking over this 12z ICON ...which I'll use to demo a discussion point(s) because I'm detecting it also among all the other guidance, frankly.

It has to do with the handling of the mid .. U/A closing features wrt to the surface reflection ... 

The 12z Tuesday position of all illustrates a deep layer quasi closing 500 mb center that is well west of an broadly opened pressure basin ... That open space appears to have several meso-beta-scaled lows whirling around inside an open region. 

That is not a captured low ...  That schism is typical of a systemic detachment.  It could be convective over selling... But, a stronger, deeper closing 500 mb ( deeper than struggling beneath 540 dm), would do wonders to focus.

Frankly, this system still looks like it has from the get go to me - a protracted moderate winter storm, and I do think it snows more than rains west of the immediate climo coastal zones...  Obviously across the life-cycle, pulse or two of isolated heavy cannot be ruled out..but the by-and-large distinction is not a major player.  

It is, however, possible to approach major impact by virtue of duration culminating - that's the storm zealot/enthusiasts best pathway to salvation the way this stands now.

What needs to improve to bring irresponsible lust for destruction and dystopia over the top ( lol ):   

This also still is a whopper hemispherically supportive scaffolding, in the sense that the +PNAP ( and by the way ... the PNA looks now more properly involved, and that makes this whole ordeal more H.A. in nature ..) is blossoming western heights, while a vestigial/collapsing -NAO westerly limb blocking node is pivoting SE through the lower Maritime region. That is pinning a neggie node near us...  What is somewhat lacking in all this, is that in situ S/W mechanical feed-in isn't ( thus far in guidance ..) nearly as equally impressive. 

 

Same page....lots of 12" over 36 hr reports.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I meant the subsidence between the low level deformation near the coast and mid level deformation to the west in SNE...the northern extent was always in question.

Gaps in forcing are easier to point out than the northern extent of mid level deformation IMO.

 

Yeah that moved around a bit. Some runs crushed LWM/ASH/MHT and eventually they became part of the subby zone. I forget what models looked like at d5 though...I'll have to go back through the 12/12 posts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dendrite said:

Yeah that moved around a bit. Some runs crushed LWM/ASH/MHT and eventually they became part of the subby zone. I forget what models looked like at d5 though...I'll have to go back through the 12/12 posts.

Yea, I mean there is always noise and some variance....but I never bought that. My area looked pegged for that from several days out. I remember debating Scott about exactly that. The EURO tried to park the mid level band as far south as the MA/NH border like 24 hrs out, too....called BS on that.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, I mean there is always noise and some variance....but I never bought that. My area looked pegged for that from several days out. I remember debating Scott about exactly that. The EURO tried to park the mid level band as far south as the MA/NH border like 24 hrs out, too....called BS on that.

Yeah. It just sat on models pretty much over the same area for days.  Good call on your part 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HoarfrostHubb said:

Yeah. It just sat on models pretty much over the same area for days.  Good call on your part 

I am not trying to sound like Harvey Leonard...Brian and Scott are right, more often than not, that doesn't work...but it was just so glaring in that instance. Very well may not work out like that, this time....but I'm hedging that way.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We should still be leaning heavily on ensembles at this point, right? The energy doesn't come ashore until midday Friday, so we don't know the exact level of detail the deterministic model approach would require. Obviously I'm hoping for a more potent, concentrated shortwave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...