Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Watching closely .. February 1-3rd for moderate to major coastal event


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, WinterWolf said:

You know...back in feb 13, the real obscene totals were forecast to be confined out east/eastern Mass and NE Mass.  And we got into it big time..and it wasn’t forecast at all to be like that.  So you never know with these big dogs just how everything evolves and comes together?  Gonna be a great storm for us WCT folks I think regardless. 

If I remember correctly though that was largely due to the band pivoting back west and stalling for a while. I think the occlusion was slower to occur too so we kept the moisture advection into the storm. If H7 was to slide south and east and then take a more northeast turn as opposed to what the models are doing with it now...that type of scenario (I think) would be very likely and we would see widespread 18-24 across the state with some 30'' totals

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, ineedsnow said:

Most are happy ugh.. Still stinks here compared to everyone else

Well, it could be the models are overdoing the Valley shadowing a bit but historicaly the I- 91 corridor has a tough time with straight E fetch storms.  You really need to hope,for all of us in W MA, thatt the initial thump is solid.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

You know...back in feb 13, the real obscene totals were forecast to be confined out east/eastern Mass and NE Mass.  And we got into it big time..and it wasn’t forecast at all to be like that.  So you never know with these big dogs just how everything evolves and comes together?  Gonna be a great storm for us WCT folks I think regardless. 

18"+ Seymour to Soutbury down SW

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, CoastalWx said:

I just think temps will get borderline, and when the DGZ dries out, that’s when it will mix with rain. So I would lean lower near the coast. Also don’t forget about the 700 low west rule. It probably will move out just a little quicker than one thinks. I’m seeing models generate some good QPF below the DGZ so it might be a little biased too wet. 

That should be near the end of the heavy qpf.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yep, they love going one step too far sometimes and making their own clown map. No need to push it beyond 12-18, and more of the east should be 8-12. Too many question marks. It *could* happen, to forecast this is rough.

Totally agree. They used to be much more conservative 10+ years ago. But more recently they love going balls to the wall and end up busting more often than not. Down this way I feel 12” is out ceiling, I’m think 6-10” shoreline east of HVN. 8-14” for the majority of the state...pocket of 12-18” for the SW/NE corners.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

I just think temps will get borderline, and when the DGZ dries out, that’s when it will mix with rain. So I would lean lower near the coast. Also don’t forget about the 700 low west rule. It probably will move out just a little quicker than one thinks. I’m seeing models generate some good QPF below the DGZ so it might be a little biased too wet. 

You almost never forecast widespread 12"+ when H7 is west.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hoth said:

I have a good feeling about this one. Not saying I see 30, but would not surprise me if someone around here does.

I’d like to be in Ridgefield for this. I think that area jacks . You to Runny are in the 15-20” range. I think I’m more 12–16” unless the firehose does better in Ne CT

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At least for my forecast, I hope I'm not QPF hugging too much here. It's great seeing these QPF outputs (which I obviously weighed heavily on) but damn...I think there's quite a bit to be nervous about for even getting widespread 12'' plus here. It really is just going to depend on how long we are getting maximized rates. But this is IJD (and this is very similar throughout CT) but look at how rapidly drier air starts getting down into where the DGZ would be. I'm nervous the thump is going to be very quick

image.thumb.png.376ca77272af510fd1ae07b61127da93.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, weatherwiz said:

If I remember correctly though that was largely due to the band pivoting back west and stalling for a while. I think the occlusion was slower to occur too so we kept the moisture advection into the storm. If H7 was to slide south and east and then take a more northeast turn as opposed to what the models are doing with it now...that type of scenario (I think) would be very likely and we would see widespread 18-24 across the state with some 30'' totals

I guess my point is there will be surprises...there always is.  Nobody expected that band to set up where it did in 13...none of the modeling had that at all. And I guess that’s my point.  Fun storm incoming for us regardless. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...