Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,615
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

Watching closely .. February 1-3rd for moderate to major coastal event


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, ScottieBird said:

I've been following SNE weather for over 35 years and I've never seen a forecast as bad as the absolute CRAP NWS Taunton put out this morning.  If the person who signed off on that forecast this morning has healthcare from your government job, be grateful because you haven't earned this healthcare policy based on competence.

Pretty harsh.   Do tell us the difference between your thoughts and NWS.   

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ScottieBird said:

I've been following SNE weather for over 35 years and I've never seen a forecast as bad as the absolute CRAP NWS Taunton put out this morning.  If the person who signed off on that forecast this morning has healthcare from your government job, be grateful because you haven't earned this healthcare policy based on competence.

How do you know that the forecast is “CRAP” or incompetent?

Until the storm is already over, I don’t see how you have room to judge them like that. Especially since you haven’t given your own thoughts.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, ScottieBird said:

I've been following SNE weather for over 35 years and I've never seen a forecast as bad as the absolute CRAP NWS Taunton put out this morning.  If the person who signed off on that forecast this morning has healthcare from your government job, be grateful because you haven't earned this healthcare policy based on competence.

Epic 1st post.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ScottieBird said:

they were forecasting 8-12 this AM for 150 thousand people along the south coast of Rhode island.

Looks like they’ve cut that down quite a bit now. It shouldn’t have been done, but it was very early, even before the watches were issued.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Baroclinic Zone said:

Epic 1st post.

When I was a kid circa 1989 a forecast that bad would've infuriated me because I would've believed it but 3 decades later laymen now have all these tools and we're able to TOSS crap forecasts even if they emanate from supposedly credible governmental sources.

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, ScottieBird said:

I've been following SNE weather for over 35 years and I've never seen a forecast as bad as the absolute CRAP NWS Taunton put out this morning.  If the person who signed off on that forecast this morning has healthcare from your government job, be grateful because you haven't earned this healthcare policy based on competence.

You have earned your first weenie. A gift from me to you. Welcome to the board and enjoy the bun.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, weathafella said:

Ok and what was your total for the storm presuming you measured and shoveled?

BOX corrected its forecast. It's obvious a senior forecaster cleaned the mess up. Maybe someone was bombed during the overnight shift? I'm expecting 2 to 4 in Newport. A far cry from the odious forecast this AM of 8-12. This storm kinda reminds me of a Feburary 1995 snow event.

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, ScottieBird said:

When I was a kid circa 1989 a forecast that bad would've infuriated me because I would've believed it but 3 decades later laymen now have all these tools and we're able to TOSS crap forecasts even if they emanate from supposedly credible governmental sources.

You’re a youngin’

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The 4 Seasons said:

While we wait for the 00Z cycle to come in i took a dive into CIPS to check some analogs. Looks like the blizzard of 96 is #1 for the NAM, the interior Northeast event of 1994 at 2 (what kocin would call a "near-miss storm" and the blizzard of 2016 and 2015 at 3 and 4.

namanalogCapture.thumb.JPG.ddd06abbbea9db76665d14d0d8c0682a.JPGAVGPC72_nam212F060.png.e15fecf053e266b6e64b95696a1d1aef.png

The GFS 84HR analog #1 is the blizzard of 2015. A 1989 storm i dont recognize and a Feb 1996 Nor'easter. I didnt notice this one either but looked it up and has striking similarities with the snowfall distribution with two maxes, one around NYC/NJ and the other in E NE Mass.

gfsanalogCapture.thumb.JPG.b74353113cfa19af758fb80ef4f02bb5.JPGNJSnow-16Feb96.png.ebb880870c25b1081a1d3fddfb5d52b8.png

Mean 72-HR snowfall has a really wide area of 8-12" over most of SNE for the top 15 analogs. 

633928183_meeeanMEDSN72_nam212F060(1).png.f913465908b08c881d3d4771067172a3.png

These change run-run but seems that Jan 96 and Jan 15/16 have been hitting hard on the top 5 for a while now. 

Nice collage and effort here !

no not trying to nit pick ( seriously ...) but I have such vivid memories of the week leading and throughout that 1996 event to confidently argue, it is/was really only similar as it landed on the EC in that 7am window of the 8th that year.  The frames leading got there differently and that very much matters in my mind -  what that sort of signifies to me is this storm is relatively unique ..if that's 96 variant is a top dawg comparison - although that QPF distribution (presently...) looks similar.   

1996 was a close roller that ran into a cold loaded damming event ... This is closing and deepening in the other direction - just sayn'

But I do think hemispheric and "super synoptic"  ( mean synergistic effects ) this system is rather unique. It's formulating in the R-wave seam ... which is why it is moving so slow.  The one 1996 was in a slower medium/flow rate.   Perhaps it doesn't matter "how" we get there - agreed... I mean it is what it is.  If it does similarly when it's there who is gonna care. Lol. But, ... this one I think has a bit of dark uncertainty to it because of that "Lagrangian" wave space.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...