Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Watching closely .. February 1-3rd for moderate to major coastal event


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

The GFS usually at this range will try to barrel these sorts of systems too far north and to add insult to injury there is a -NAO in this case.  The right idea is probably something less north than the GFS on approach to the east coast but probably less sloppy and disjointed thereafter than the Euro is.  It’s probably going to be a much “cleaner” coastal low than we are seeing on alot of the guidance now.     Someone is gonna clean up getting hit by both the initial overrunning and then the coastal jump.  That probably isn’t gonna be anybody north of SW CT.  That zone will certainly be somewhere between say Fairfield Co CT and Wilmington DE.  I rarely say in a Miller B esque or type event you wanna be in NYC but this may be a case where somewhere near NYC is the jackpot due to the blocking setup  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

The GFS usually at this range will try to barrel these sorts of systems too far north and to add insult to injury there is a -NAO in this case.  The right idea is probably something less north than the GFS on approach to the east coast but probably less sloppy and disjointed thereafter than the Euro is.  It’s probably going to be a much “cleaner” coastal low than we are seeing on alot of the guidance now.     Someone is gonna clean up getting hit by both the initial overrunning and then the coastal jump.  That probably isn’t gonna be anybody north of SW CT.  That zone will certainly be somewhere between say Fairfield Co CT and Wilmington DE.  I rarely say in a Miller B esque or type event you wanna be in NYC but this may be a case where somewhere near NYC is the jackpot due to the blocking setup  

Ray just threw his phone and computer into a ditch on the highway.

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wouldn’t even bother to look at gfs until it’s under 96 hours, hell, maybe even 24 hours out lol....I can honestly say that if the GFS gave me 18 feet of snow at 120 hours out it wouldn’t even get me excited that’s how bad of a model it is. It is currently ranked below the JMA at day 5 verification. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Wentzadelphia said:

Wouldn’t even bother to look at gfs until it’s under 96 hours, hell, maybe even 24 hours out lol....I can honestly say that if the GFS gave me 18 feet of snow at 120 hours out it wouldn’t even get me excited that’s how bad of a model it is. It is currently ranked below the JMA at day 5 verification. 

Agree. We look and watch but weigh it very lightly. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...