Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

February the climo snow month


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I get your point.

I think you're wrong...and you should get over it frankly.

I don't see fast flow as being prohibitive of a moderate 4-8" or 6-10" type of "payload" from an attenuating system in the face of confluence, abutting arctic air.

"get over" what ?

dude ... you imagine confrontation too frequently and then smolder -

it's annoying more so than your stubbornness and frankly I don't give a flying f if you agree, don't or think who is right or wrong. 

And by the way... I am not wrong about those statement I made regarding the model performance/tendencies therein - nor the veracious application of them.

We're done -

  • Like 2
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Typhoon Tip said:

"get over" what ?

dude ... you imagine confrontation too frequently and then smolder -

it's annoying more so than your stubbornness and frankly I don't give a flying f if you agree, don't or think who is right or wrong. 

And by the way... I am not wrong about those statement I made regarding the model performance/tendencies therein - nor the veracious application of them.

We're done -

What is annoying is your arrogant tendency to assume someone either doesn't understand, or is out of touch with reality whenever they disagree. Believe it or not, despite how verbose and nauseatingly long winded your posts are, its possible for those who have the balls and tenacity to venture  to read the whole thing to understand and simply disagree. Yes, most SWs have trended toward increased attenuation from the mid range this season, but that doesn't necessarily mean that we can't see a warning event out of this and I have explained why.

Didn't we just see a 4-8" event end up with a band of 10-15" four days ago?

Now we're done-

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Damage In Tolland said:

What a nasty fight. This is really getting serious . Fight fight fight 

I can't until we verify widespread warning on Tuesday, then he explains why he still wasn't wrong in 124, 843 words or less. He'll pick some obscure detail that no one else thinks is a big deal, and claim it changes everything, as he hops aboard the consensus train.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 6
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...