Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,617
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

February the climo snow month


Ginx snewx
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

One thing you want to see on a longer range threat is strong cross-guidance ensemble support. 

Heres the EPS, GFS, and GEPS in that order:

image.png.67bba878fe2cd79df43e9b8226183589.png

image.png.1901b45ef6f3d5fe4980d1088e30d82c.png

image.png.a3ecbf5d4159eeb7e0b1d936445aab6d.png

For those who can’t handle the emotional roller coaster of failed storms, I’d suggest not checking back in until the 2nd half of this week. But this is at least a pretty strong guidance signal for a D8-9 threat. 

I think the vast majority of folks here are no longer on any roller coaster.  Rather, we're resigned to what is.  We'll take whatever might occur as a pleasant surprise in one of the worst winters evah.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Snowcrazed71 said:

What do expect him to say. It's not coming. The winter is over. I did that a few days back. Have been very disappointed with the turnout thus far. However, I also can see this pattern yielding something very very big. Just had that vibe.

Yea. Regression sucks but we’ve swung to the negative side of the spectrum so much that eventually we’re back into a positive regression phase. I’m a big believer in the rubber band theory...if there is such a thing. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

Yea. Regression sucks but we’ve swung to the negative side of the spectrum so much that eventually we’re back into a positive regression phase. I’m a big believer in the rubber band theory...if there is such a thing. 

Nature will forever fight the battle for entropy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Baroclinic Zone said:

I’m not negative at all.  The AOATT becomes old.  Healthy doses of reality are needed.  You’ll eventually be right though as the blind squirrel gets the nut sometimes.

But I haven’t denied reality once (I’ve recognized the crap we are in) so what’s the problem with me injecting a little positivity in this place full of whiners?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

But I haven’t denied reality once (I’ve recognized the crap we are in) so what’s the problem with me injecting a little positivity in this place full of whiners?

I agree, now any discussion of possibilities is met by the school children whining about their lack of frozen water. I suggested they just stop posting their whines but they can not resist. And then you have people taking pot shots. Thing about the weather is, it is never static and always evolving. Its embarrassing that well educated people can not understand that 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

I agree, now any discussion of possibilities is met by the school children whining about their lack of frozen water. I suggested they just stop posting their whines but they can not resist. And then you have people taking pot shots. Thing about the weather is, it is never static and always evolving. Its embarrassing that well educated people can not understand that 

Discussion of potential is one thing, saying they are coming is another.  But you can parse the differences, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Ginx snewx said:

We science 

500hgt_comp_sup610.gif

And science has said we’ve lacked a solid baroclinic zone over the US for the majority of the month.  Hence the + departures over most of the US and torched over the upper plains where the majority of our cold comes from.  If this changes and we see closer to normal temps over the upper plains, this should help shove that zone further south and East.

 

30dTDeptUS.png

93568E36-9225-4F28-B33A-C24DBFBD790A.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I posted this in the tired January thread .. not realizing this one was/is active:

Multi agency PNA monitoring suggest either a mode change to modestly positive, or, a neutralization of the erstwhile negative character of that index.  ( Edit, this concerts with what Will is saying about support from different sources ...)

The NAO obolishes ..or, at least this current rendition of it - being a west based exhausted elephant that's decided to set it's ass down over eastern N/A. 

Rising PNA of any kind during an NAO block decay sends a modest Archembaultian 'correction event' vibe through the hemisphere.   This would time during the January 28 - thru about Feb 5 span of time.  I wouldn't be argumentative if anyone advanced discussion over anything in that time frame already on the charts, or in surmise ...were guessing something may emerge in the guidance.

As a quick exit point, there are semblances of the -EPO in some operational cycles that I'm seeing occasionally as of late. These may be figments of an underlying detection for the former change in the PNA ... sort of an obscure confidence that 'some'thing is trying to snap one end of the bed linen over the next 10 days.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...