A-L-E-K Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 nam fixin to start it's long journey back into the fold? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchaumburgStormer Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 NAM looks to be about in line with the GFS so far. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ChiTownSnow Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 43 minutes ago, A-L-E-K said: quick note on the plumes and fwiw, a few of those non-events at ORD are rainers and there are more big dogs at MKE than ORD I like seeing MKE in the game while other models hint sound. Historically this bodes well for ORD and Lake enhancements set up Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AWMT30 Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 NAM looks way better at H5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 22, 2021 Author Share Posted January 22, 2021 18z NAM looks to be headed north and faster. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hoosier Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 18z NAM should be north. Less suppressive influence in Canada. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
UMB WX Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 9 minutes ago, ChiTownSnow said: I like seeing MKE in the game while other models hint sound. Historically this bodes well for ORD and Lake enhancements set up Yup.. Thankfully we have a cap on how far north snow can creep up. Gotta shed that se trend as we get closer to go time at some point. This storm might not be the best candidate to break that SE trend phenomenon with the elephant in the room to the north. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchaumburgStormer Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 3 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said: 18z NAM looks to be headed north and faster. orr not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 22, 2021 Author Share Posted January 22, 2021 5 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said: 18z NAM looks to be headed north and faster. Definitely faster, but only a tick north. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchaumburgStormer Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Just now, Chicago Storm said: Definitely faster, but only a tick north. Appears to be a weaker storm overall than what is being shown on the other models. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 22, 2021 Author Share Posted January 22, 2021 Just now, SchaumburgStormer said: Appears to be a weaker storm overall than what is being shown on the other models. Good point. Appears to be the weakest of any OP guidance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILSNOW Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Nice snow desert for chicagoland on 18z NAM LOL!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 22, 2021 Author Share Posted January 22, 2021 Just now, Angrysummons said: Your not going to have large snowfall rates with the lack of arctic air. this might be the new dumbest thing you've said. 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hlcater Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 2 minutes ago, Angrysummons said: Your not going to have large snowfall rates with the lack of arctic air. This is not a historically impressive setup. The Euro is too far northwest, which with its bias, makes sense. Lol. It's almost as if arctic air doesnt tend to hold moisture very well and the region's historically biggest storms have happened with temps 25-30 degrees. Rejecting the fact that to even get a big storm, you need an airmass capable of holding moisture. Arctic air aint it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 22, 2021 Author Share Posted January 22, 2021 Just now, Angrysummons said: It is what it is. Keep on living through clown maps. you apparently were not around for the 1-3"/hour snowfall rates in northeast illinois a few nights ago, without arctic air. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hlcater Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Just now, Angrysummons said: Nope, you need it at the surface and warmer up above, that is what creates big storms in this kind of setup. You don't got it kid. Period. Your just being a weenie and hoping for the over amped solutions verify. When they don't, you will complain and call names at the Euro for its tech issues. You're*** tyvm Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 I just typed something mean but deleted it. Hoosier would be proud. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nwohweather Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 4 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said: this might be the new dumbest thing you've said. Hahaha has he never heard of an Alberta Clipper before? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnwx85 Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Considering how heated things are getting on the forum we're not going to have any cold air in place at all. 3 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 22, 2021 Author Share Posted January 22, 2021 2 minutes ago, Angrysummons said: lol, this post. You do get this isn't the same thing eh???? Maybe you need to educate yourself better. you used to be better at trolling than this. it's a shame. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 22, 2021 Author Share Posted January 22, 2021 1 minute ago, sbnwx85 said: Considering how heated things are getting on the forum we're not going to have any cold air in place at all. a ton of latent heat release. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 14 minutes ago, Angrysummons said: Your not going to have large snowfall rates with the lack of arctic air. This is not a historically impressive setup. The Euro is too far northwest, which with its bias, makes sense. You are so unbelievably wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 22, 2021 Author Share Posted January 22, 2021 On 1/20/2021 at 2:22 PM, hlcater said: just want to point out that the last storm thread @Chicago Storm started did not end well lol. On 1/20/2021 at 2:26 PM, Baum said: it was memorable. That's the goal. On 1/20/2021 at 2:27 PM, hlcater said: The real treasure was never the snow but the friends and shared memories we made along the way pretty much. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Like seriously how can one be so wrong on literally everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chicago Storm Posted January 22, 2021 Author Share Posted January 22, 2021 1 minute ago, Angrysummons said: Again, show a phase that brings the snow outside GEFS/EPS runs that are programmed with the "what if". The energy doesn't look that strong frankly. That is the problem. Without phasing, your sunk boy. lol. need alek to throw up a tth. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Radtechwxman Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Man I was just originally here for the meteorology but nowadays I get a complimentary reality TV show too. The Real Weatherweenies of Americanwx Forums. The pettiness and drama is strong on this one. I do appreciate those who are inputting quality analysis posts and not childish arguments 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stebo Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Just now, Angrysummons said: Again, show a phase that brings the snow outside GEFS/EPS runs that are programmed with the "what if". The energy doesn't look that strong frankly. That is the problem. Without phasing, your sunk boy. You dont need phasing to have a big storm. Like wow you are really going to fall on your sword with this one. GHD 2015 wasn't a phased system and I got 15" of snow. Or was i just imagining that snow storm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geoboy645 Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Just now, Angrysummons said: Again, show a phase that brings the snow outside GEFS/EPS runs that are programmed with the "what if". The energy doesn't look that strong frankly. That is the problem. Without phasing, your sunk boy. Phasing? This event doesn't involve phasing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hlcater Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 2 minutes ago, Chicago Storm said: pretty much. Definitely some grade A shared memories being made right now 2 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mimillman Posted January 22, 2021 Share Posted January 22, 2021 Everyone should just learn to be nice like me and Alek, god. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts