Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,589
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Snow-ice-rain for the NYC forum 7PM Mon 1/25-6AM Wednesday 1/27


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

Yep. If the NAM idea is correct it’s not going to so much as flurry north of Cape May

The NAM historically has sucked with these types of systems beyond 48 however.  Usually is somewhat too flat.  We’ve gotten all excited here a few times on more classic events like this where every model has I90 being pounded but the NAM shows the main snow axis over NYC only for it to jump 100 miles inside 2 days.  This looks like it might be that 1 in 50 SWFE type events where this area gets decent snows.   There hasn’t really been one in 20 years or more.  I don’t include 2/23/08 because that technically flipped over to rain eventually 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

The NAM historically has sucked with these types of systems beyond 48 however.  Usually is somewhat too flat.  We’ve gotten all excited here a few times on more classic events like this where every model has I90 being pounded but the NAM shows the main snow axis over NYC only for it to jump 100 miles inside 2 days.  This looks like it might be that 1 in 50 SWFE type events where this area gets decent snows.   There hasn’t really been one in 20 years or more.  I don’t include 2/23/08 because that technically flipped over to rain eventually 

I thought we had 6 inches of snow with 2/23/08.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, PoZitron20 said:

12z ECMWF date 1-22-2021
-----------------------------------------------------
hr-by-hr updates

hr54-60hr energy more consolidated than 00z
hr72 north of 00z
hr78 same position as 00z
hr84 a bit weaker than 00z
hr90 the backend trail energy is trying to charge this storm's vorticity or atleast is long and connected to the next's storm vort
very weak storm for CNJ is the final call on this ECMWF run

Not a great sign two weak runs of Euro 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, PoZitron20 said:

12z ECMWF date 1-22-2021
-----------------------------------------------------
hr-by-hr updates

hr54-60hr energy more consolidated than 00z
hr72 north of 00z
hr78 same position as 00z
hr84 a bit weaker than 00z
hr90 the backend trail energy is trying to charge this storm's vorticity or atleast is long and connected to the next's storm vort
very weak storm for CNJ is the final call on this ECMWF run

Euro still showing a 1.5 to 4 inch snow for a lot of the area. This continues to look like a decent advisory level event. A little early for predictions, but right now looking like a 2 to 4 or 3 to 5 event. Euro right now is showing slightly less than the other models.

  • Like 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

My 3P/22 impressions: have looked at everything that's available via 12z/22 modeling except no GFSv16.  In any case,  I may be 6 hours too fast on the start and 1-2" too high on the high end of the ranges provided this morning. Advisory or low end warning most of forum except n of POU-DXR-HVN (drying out?).  Shorter duration with primary impact Tuesday morning commute. snow ratios should 10 to 12 to 1 north of I80 tho no guarantee. 

Understand the concern about dry air eating up snow near I84 se NYS and especially CT/MA where greatest doubts. QPF is not impressive but NAEFS holding it's own...maybe south by 20 MI at most. I like the 500MB vort max translating east or east southeast across northern PA Tuesday. Unsure whether we can get a deep saturated layer up here between I80 and the NYS border? so the I80 axis should do well with at least WAA snow Mon night and east then sewd movin rh from southern NYS and northern PA midday Tuesday. My end time still close to 6P Tue but may lag a little per EC.  Waiting this out a little longer. I think the NAM will become more helpful with 12z/23 cycle...still a little out of range and 84 hr NAM not known to me as the best of its output. 

 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...