Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,615
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Vesuvius
    Newest Member
    Vesuvius
    Joined

Feb Long Range Discussion (Day 3 and beyond) - MERGED


WinterWxLuvr
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

This. This will very likely trend north the last 48 hours. We want to get it as far south as we can now. I wouldn’t mind one more south jump tonight before the likely bleed north on guidance starts once the wave tonight gets out of the way. 

Of course Ji would say when we need a north trend we get...you know.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

This. This will very likely trend north the last 48 hours. We want to get it as far south as we can now. I wouldn’t mind one more south jump tonight before the likely bleed north on guidance starts once the wave tonight gets out of the way. 

Yep, been watching the sleet and mix line push further NW all day into Ohio with the low tracking through now.  Model shift NW started last night.  Don't want it to happen, but it likely will.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, osfan24 said:

Yeah, I know I've had enough 1-3/2-4 and then wintry mix/slop storms in the past five years.

Yea I didn’t want to throw that part in because I know there are parts of this sub that haven’t had much snow. But I’ve had plenty of ho hum minor snowfalls lately. I want something dynamic. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CAPE said:

SREFs look just like the NAM. 

pick your emote. :yikes::lol::wacko::rolleyes:

 

 

Hope they start trending toward the globals but have they ever not been amped and north? It’s anecdotal but  I feel like anytime there is a southern slider we can at least count on the srefs to throw us .50 of digital qpf when everything else is dry.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

Yea I didn’t want to throw that part in because I know there are parts of this sub that haven’t had much snow. But I’ve had plenty of ho hum minor snowfalls lately. I want something dynamic. 

Yep. I'd take 6 inches over 6-8 hours opposed to 10 over 36 hours, lol. About time us DC folk see good rates that actually accumulate. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Wondering

Mr. Cape, I though you were near Annapolis, anyway I would be glad to be fringed in the SW part of Frederick County so that the SE gang gets a bigger hit.  There were robins flying everywhere around my house today, sign of spring.  I have had about 25 inches, unless it is a big one I have also had enough!  I guess I am getting old...

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

There is nothing more I need to see from the globals.  They are all close to showing max potential inside 72 hours. At this point I just want to see the NAM cave. Totally fully and completely cave and spit out some NAMd worthy 15” solution. Yea it’s (and it’s idiotic SREF friends) probably wrong but I want that option off the table because probably isn’t definitely and snow is serious business 

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

There is nothing more I need to see from the globals.  They are all close to showing max potential inside 72 hours. At this point I just want to see the NAM cave. Totally fully and completely cave and spit out some NAMd worthy 15” solution. Yea it’s (and it’s idiotic SREF friends) probably wrong but I want that option off the table because probably isn’t definitely and snow is serious business 

IIRC, the SREFs have some of the NAM-esque members in there so if the NAM trends one way don't the SREFs follow to a degree? Can anyone confirm that? @ers-wxman1, @WxUSAF, @csnavywx?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...