Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,793
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

January Storm Term Threat Discussions (Day 3 - Day 7)


WxUSAF
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, ryanconway63 said:

The 6z Para GFS seems most realistic to me at this point.   I cant get excited with what the Euro is currently showing.....If a MECS was coming the Euro will definitely pick up on it by 12z today.  If not ill remain extremely skeptical 

Not sure we can make any definitive statements on this one yet... the models have been struggling mightily in this pattern. It’s been really tough to even search for trends... every time it seems there is one, the models shift the next suite. I’d keep an open mind...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ralph Wiggum said:

Admittedly I have an unnerving feeling about this one, especially after the reading above where the GFS if it is wrong takes several runs to adjust. 

Did that rule work when the gfs went from a historic SC storm to a historic NC storm to a historic Lynchburg storm to a historic Norfolk storm to a historic nova storm in 3 days

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Wentzadelphia said:

This is good info to know. From our Philly board met. 
 

If the GFS went off the rails, it takes about 30 hours of runs to self correct because it uses its own 6 hr forecast to adjust initial conditions.  Hence if it is an error, it gets perpetuated in future runs until a pair of sounding runs expunge it. The Euro starts from scratch each sounding run. So by the 00z run tonight we will know”

Where is this from?  I dont see it on here... and i've never heard of that before with any model

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, leesburg 04 said:

Did that rule work when the gfs went from a historic SC storm to a historic NC storm to a historic Lynchburg storm to a historic Norfolk storm to a historic nova storm in 3 days

Touche. Would like the know which poster on the other forum said that about the GFS.

In other news, the NAM at range looks consolidated with the sw in the SW about to move out.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LP08 said:

I’d bet dollar to donuts that the gfs doesn’t use it’s 6hr forecast for its next run.  It injests new data prior to every run.

I know it used to do that for the 6z and 18z runs.  Thats why back in the day, the 6z and 18z runs could burp out some real outlier solutions.  But I thought that changed long ago.  @high risk?

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

I know it used to do that for the 6z and 18z runs.  Thats why back in the day, the 6z and 18z runs could burp out some real outlier solutions.  But I thought that changed long ago.  @high risk?

@dtk would be a good one to ask too, I think. To be honest I'm calling BS preliminarily as well. 30 hours to adjust? Why wouldn't it be 24? Or 12? 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I caught Jay’s FB post late last night after the epic GFS run, so I knew there would be a lot to read through this morning. We always need perfect ingredients to get a nice coastal storm around here, which is what the Euro showed on Wed/Thursday and what the GFS has now shown for a couple of runs.  I  do agree with someone else who says that the Euro often shows a storm in the long-term, loses it in the medium range and then brings it back.  I also recall a few winters recently that the Euro has not done great, which some have attributed to the strong Pacific. I’m hoping that the GFS is on to something because we all could use some purples, pinks, and greens around here. So I guess we all just hold our breath until 12z...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm not a data assimilation scientist although I interact with that community from time to time. So take this fwiw. 

All of the global centers pretty much ingest the same sfc obs, aircraft obs, satellite obs, and radiosondes. ECMWF has a bit of an advantage because they can use some Chinese and Russian satellites that NOAA is prohibited from using, and I think they have a longer time window for when they allow observations to roll in (this is part of why it comes out later). Where they differ is how they adjust the initial state...they all start from the previous forecast but how much impact observations are allowed to have to change this state, and how observations at one time/location impact the fields at different times/locations depend on the assimilation technique.

The radiosondes have the largest impact (https://gmao.gsfc.nasa.gov/forecasts/systems/fp/obs_impact/), so that lends some credence to giving more weight to the 12z/0z runs if they show a big change, but  there is plenty of other independent info going into the 6z/18z runs.

  • Like 9
  • Thanks 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So ICON went even more strung out....essentially a nothing burger. UKIE is a nothing burger. And Euro is in that camp? Euro needs to find better friends....it doesn't need that sort of negativity.
Icon has a good ull but it's crushed by a strong ull feature in Canada. Gfs had that feature way north

Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ji said:

I've seen the gfs give us a big storm at 12z only to take it away at 18z....one of the many reasons I complain last so much

Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk
 

It is simply incredible when you look at the GFS and this morning's European even the GFS ensembles and the huge differences at 120 hours between them. Sometimes folks will mention to GFS has been consistent for 3 days in a row but even that means little.  consistency does not necessarily mean accuracy eventually the GFS flipped and went to the European solution I believe this was a few years ago

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, yoda said:

Seems really weird though... I politely disagree with that assessment

It’s not that simple as the above met posted, idk was just throwing it out there. Doesnt  mean the gfs is wrong would like to have the euro/Ukie on board very soon 

 

50 minutes ago, LeesburgWx said:

In December, GFS led the way, right? I am concerned seeing only the GFS and maybe Canadian giving us a big storm. Anyone extrapolating the NAM yet?

Idk up here it was atrocious. Was way too south. So was the euro though at times. There were runs like 3 days out that had Philly getting the max snow with Bgm sniffing virga 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It is simply incredible when you look at the GFS and this morning's European even the GFS ensembles and the huge differences at 120 hours between them. Sometimes folks will mention to GFS has been consistent for 3 days in a row but even that means little.  consistency does not necessarily mean accuracy eventually the GFS flipped and went to the European solution I believe this was a few years ago
Yep being consistent means nothing when it doesn't agree with a superior model. It's heartbreaking but I think we all know what's going to happen

Sent from my SM-G981V using Tapatalk

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

EPS members snow/sleet totals (inches) for the last 12 runs (College Park) through 00 UT Feb 3

90th percentile: 9 15 12 15 12 16 18 12 13 10 10 11

80th percentile: 6 10 11 9 10 12 13 9 11 7 6 8

70th percentile: 6 6 9 8 7 11 11 8 9 6 3 6

60th percentile: 4 5 8 6 6 7 9 7 7 4 2 5

50th percentile: 3 4 6 5 4 6 7 6 6 2 1 4 

40th percentile: 2 3 4 4 4 5 6 5 6 2 0.8 4

30th percentile: 2 1 4 3 3 4 5 4 5 0.9 0.6 3 

20th percentile: 0.7 0.6 3 2 2 3 3 4 3 0.5 0.4 2

10th percentile: 0.5 0.3 1 1 1 1 3 3 1 0 0.1 1

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...