Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,856
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Johnlor5294
    Newest Member
    Johnlor5294
    Joined

January Long Range Disco Thread


yoda
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'll throw this in for those who like these maps. It is the best snowfall mean I have seen in a long time, but then I don't look at them every run. 6z backed off a bit, but still pretty good.

Outside of the western highlands, this is effectively from the 17th through the end of the run.

1611619200-kJZ1EzgvE0I.png

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 12:48 PM, CAPE said:

I'll throw this in for those who like these maps. It is the best snowfall mean I have seen in a long time, but then I don't look at them every run. 6z backed off a bit, but still pretty good.

Outside of the western highlands, this is effectively from the 17th through the end of the run.

 

Expand  

Ha, I was about to post the same thing (and tag you since I know your love of snowfall maps).  Even though 6z backed off a touch, what I liked is that the mean south of us increased from 00z which to me probably means some southern solutions mixed in which I like seeing at range.  We’ve talked ad nauseum of this conducive pattern for what feels like 6 months now so it’s nice to see the ensembles picking up snowier surface solutions from the favorable H5 look.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 1:03 PM, nj2va said:

Ha, I was about to post the same thing (and tag you since I know your love of snowfall maps).  Even though 6z backed off a touch, what I liked is that the mean south of us increased from 00z which to me probably means some southern solutions mixed in which I like seeing at range.  We’ve talked ad nauseum of this conducive pattern for what feels like 6 months now so it’s nice to see the ensembles picking up snowier surface solutions from the favorable H5 look.

Expand  

Yeah there is a solid signal for some frozen beyond day 7 on the last few runs of the GEFS, from extreme northern NC through all of VA, MD, and DE.

EPS looked decent at 12z yesterday, but not so much on the 0z run.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 10:14 AM, CAPE said:

I counted 12 members on the 0z GEFS with snow for our region on the 18-19th. Another half dozen or so with snow the 20-23rd. That is a pretty strong signal for 8+ days out.

Expand  

Just catching up a bit here, so haven't looked at much.  Was going to ask, does it appear that this is from two distinct systems, or a "timing" difference of one particular system?  The date ranges seem almost close enough (18-19 vs. 20-23) that I wondered if these are from the same event just lagged in one group vs. the other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 1:16 PM, CAPE said:

Yeah there is a solid signal for some frozen beyond day 7 on the last few runs of the GEFS, from extreme northern NC through all of VA, MD, and DE.

EPS looked decent at 12z yesterday, but not so much on the 0z run.

Expand  

Yeah, meh-tacular.  <Ji> we can never have two EPS runs in a row showing great stuff <Ji> ;) 

There is a slight signal on the 00z EPS for a possible LP off the coast around the 20th that deepens and heads NE.  Something to watch.

image.thumb.png.a792854c370f3a391343c43fdf2dfb7a.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 1:28 PM, Always in Zugzwang said:

Just catching up a bit here, so haven't looked at much.  Was going to ask, does it appear that this is from two distinct systems, or a "timing" difference of one particular system?  The date ranges seem almost close enough (18-19 vs. 20-23) that I wondered if these are from the same event just lagged in one group vs. the other.

Expand  

It is sometimes difficult to tell with 30 members, but to me it looks like 2 or 3 chances between the 18th and the 24th.

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 1:16 PM, CAPE said:

Yeah there is a solid signal for some frozen beyond day 7 on the last few runs of the GEFS, from extreme northern NC through all of VA, MD, and DE.

EPS looked decent at 12z yesterday, but not so much on the 0z run.

Expand  

What I dont like about the threat around the 18th is we went from a strong 50/50 look on the means from 12z Jan 9 to barely a hint of a 50/50 same period and more of and east based -NAO signal. That hasn't worked for us over the past few weeks. Maybe the signal will return. If not maybe the followup wave around the 21st will have the predecessor wave to act as a 50/50. Am I the only one getting that can-kicking vibe lately?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 1:53 PM, BristowWx said:

I do and you have done a bang up job breaking things down.  Still nice to see some fantasy snow not massive rainstorms even on the op runs.   Guess we will see how it plays out.  

Expand  

Snow maps are pretty and all, but you and CAPE know as well as me that the truth in the LR lies upstairs at H5. The pattern isn't horrible but some of those favorable subtleties we saw 24hrs or so ago are starting to slowly fade. The overall look is ok, but seeing the 50/50 fade in lieu of more of an east based NAO ridge isn't exactly giving me the warm fuzzies tbh. Not being a deb, just being honest reporting the looks that are trending. I dont even want to discuss the LR ens at 300 hrs plus suffice it to say I really really hopethe NAO ridging can hang on and continue redeveloping. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 1:52 PM, Ralph Wiggum said:

What I dont like about the threat around the 18th is we went from a strong 50/50 look on the means from 12z Jan 9 to barely a hint of a 50/50 same period and more of and east based -NAO signal. That hasn't worked for us over the past few weeks. Maybe the signal will return. If not maybe the followup wave around the 21st will have the predecessor wave to act as a 50/50. Am I the only one getting that can-kicking vibe lately?

Expand  

Hard to say what the exact timing would be with a storm at this point, but look at this panel. We already will have had one cold front move through, and look at the TPV lobe underneath a pretty well positioned block. Not to mention the western ridge. I am definitely not hating that look.

gfs-ens_z500a_namer_33.png

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 2:04 PM, CAPE said:

Hard to say what the exact timing would be with a storm at this point, but look at this panel. We already will have had one cold front move through, and look at the TPV lobe underneath a pretty well positioned block. Not to mention the western ridge. I am definitely not hating that look.

gfs-ens_z500a_namer_33.png

 

Expand  

Not a bad look, this we can agree on. And this time as you noted we have a different player on the field  N of the GL...the TPV lobe. Guess we will find out in a few days whether this will gain traction OR will it follow the pattern and will our sw become the latest victim of the NS shred factory?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  On 1/10/2021 at 2:12 PM, Ralph Wiggum said:

Not a bad look, this we can agree on. And this time as you noted we have a different player on the field  N of the GL...the TPV lobe. Guess we will find out in a few days whether this will gain traction OR will it follow the pattern and will our sw become the latest victim of the NS shred factory?

Expand  

We will find out. We know suppression can be a risk in these setups, but I would rather flirt with that and have some decent cold to work with. Better odds of getting snow on the coastal plain with that look and cold/dry polar air available versus having a rotted Pac air mass in place every time a storm approaches.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

@Ralph Wiggum the WAR is displaced pretty far NE there. You have to take the totality of factors and how they play off each other. With a severely displaced TPV in southern Canada a ridge in the central Atlantic extending up through the NAO isn’t a bad thing. It can actually help prevent suppression in that scenario. I’m going to say this again...this isn’t directed at you but a general observation. I think because we have been stuck in a rut where NOTHING has been working out and DC is in a record snow drought the last 5 years people are starting to think unless we have this 100% absolutely textbook dead perfect pattern where every little feature is within 20 feet of where it was for some blizzard in the past it won’t work.  And I don’t blame you because that’s how it’s felt lately. Even pretty decent looks produce nothing. But 90% of our snow, maybe not our HECS 20” storms but our regular old plain snowstorms, happened in a somewhat flawed pattern. The flaw might be a valid excuse why it was only 6” instead of 20” but I’m seeing all these posts picking apart really decent looks as if it can’t snow in that pattern when we have had plenty of snowstorms in exactly that pattern.  That perfect textbook everything exactly where we want look only comes along a couple times a decade. We cannot rely on getting that to get any snow or frankly snow will be a VERY rare thing around here (which granted it has been lately).  To sum it all up my point is if we want this snow drought to end what we really need is to hope we start getting more luck with pretty good but not perfect patterns that are more common not waiting around for that pattern that comes once a decade. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...