Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

January 2021 General Discussions & Observations Thread


Stormlover74
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

I will never learn. Weeklies and ensembles past day 10 are useless. GEPS now looks terrible at day 15. Not sure what EPS looks like.

Starting to look like other years where the pattern doesn’t materialize. Always seems to be around mid January 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

I will never learn. Weeklies and ensembles past day 10 are useless. GEPS now looks terrible at day 15. Not sure what EPS looks like.

GEPS has been getting progressively more Niña looking going into February since the Thursday night run. I posted about it this morning, BAMWX pointed it out that the EPS and GEFS are backing off the very cold runs for the long range they had and are both markedly warming up each cycle for the last several runs....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

                                                                                                     HELP ME RHONDA YEAH!!!..................Get Me Out of this Winter................

Polar Vortex Bust keeps getting worse.       We do not break 20 at  mid-winter with a loose PV???!!!       The last 7 days of January are now averaging 33degs.(28/38), a full 12 degrees more than just 3 runs back.

1610884800-yXy0W2jX3cQ.png

 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Brian5671 said:

Starting to look like other years where the pattern doesn’t materialize. Always seems to be around mid January 

What drives me crazy is a lot of Mets predicted a bad year for snowfall due to no blocking and poor Pacific. We had great blocking and it still didn't matter. I can't remember ever having great blocking in a Nina and not getting a decent winter. I have only seen super Nino's with blocking fail like late 90s. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

What drives me crazy is a lot of Mets predicted a bad year for snowfall due to no blocking and poor Pacific. We had great blocking and it still didn't matter. I can't remember ever having great blocking in a Nina and not getting a decent winter. I have only seen super Nino's with blocking fail like late 90s. 

The +EPO is killing us this go around

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Brian5671 said:

The +EPO is killing us this go around

Yeah but we have had plenty of +epo winter's with blocking and we scored decently. I firmly believe if we had more storm chances we would have had some snow this winter. Our temps were fine with the right track.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

What drives me crazy is a lot of Mets predicted a bad year for snowfall due to no blocking and poor Pacific. We had great blocking and it still didn't matter. I can't remember ever having great blocking in a Nina and not getting a decent winter. I have only seen super Nino's with blocking fail like late 90s. 

It's a crap shoot. Perfectly timed shortwaves can produce major storms in any "pattern". And a great "pattern" with a slight wrinkle in the setup can produce zilch. The large scale synoptic features certainly increase or decrease the likelihood of a good winter, but there is also a lot of luck (randomness) involved.

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, EastonSN+ said:

Yeah but we have had plenty of +epo winter's with blocking and we scored decently. I firmly believe if we had more storm chances we would have had some snow this winter. Our temps were fine with the right track.

Winters are warmer now.   Seems like more of a DC type climate around here last 5-6 yrs

  • Like 5
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, eduggs said:

Thanks. That's helpful to visualize the relative likelihoods and typical ranges of each state during this upcoming time of year. It's hard to tell, but it looks like AO-/PNA+ is most common.

For another look, below is the percentage of days for select AO/PNA states and the percentage of days with 4" or greater snowfalls for New York City during the January 20-31, 1950-2020 period for each of those states:

AO-/PNA+: 39% days, 67% of daily 4" or greater snowfalls
AO-/PNA-: 19% days, 5% of daily 4" or greater snowfalls
AO+/PNA+: 20% days, 24% of daily 4" or greater snowfalls
AO+/PNA-: 22% days, 5% of daily 4" or greater snowfalls

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, NEG NAO said:

12Z Euro looks like Canadian - a miss  south mostly

prateptype_cat_ecmwf.conus.pngprateptype_cat_ecmwf.conus.png

 

 

Here's the 24 hour difference in runs out west as our storm organizes.  The new run had less phasing out west and buried the s/w.  A piece broke off and ended up to our south under the block.  

 

 

1bbfe208-5c3e-465f-9c44-ba8398c995dd.gif

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Today was partly sunny and breezy. Temperatures generally topped out in the lower and middle 40s across the region. Tomorrow will be a similar day.

During the second half of January, there will be some potential for snow events in the Middle Atlantic and southern New England regions, even as the forecast AO-/PNA- pattern is typically not a very snowy one. There continues to be ensemble support for a possible light snow event in the region during the January 21-23 timeframe during the passage of a strong cold front. Another timeframe highlighted by the ensembles is January 25-28. The latter period may have greater potential. However, neither period is likely to produce a significant snowfall (6" or above) for the Washington, DC to Boston corridor.

AO-/PNA- patterns are typically not snowy. The frequency of measurable snowfall is just over 90% of climatology in Boston and Philadelphia and around 80% of climatology in New York City for the January 21-31, 1950-2020 period. The frequency of 2" or more daily snowfall was just above 90% of climatology for Philadelphia, but fell sharply to 50% of climatology in New York City and 65% of climatology in Boston. For daily snowfall amounts in excess of 2", the frequency fell sharply for Philadelphia. As a result, such patterns typically have produced significant snowstorms (6" or above snowfall) in the northern Middle Atlantic and southern New England regions during late January. The biggest snowfalls during an AO-/PNA- pattern during the January 20-31, 1950-2020 period were as follows: Boston: 7.3", January 21, 2011; New York City: 4.2", January 21, 2011; and, Philadelphia: 3.0", January 20, 2000.

Afterward, the evolution of the AO will determine whether potential for measurable snow events will continue into February.

The ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly was -0.8°C and the Region 3.4 anomaly was -1.1°C for the week centered around January 6. For the past six weeks, the ENSO Region 1+2 anomaly has averaged -0.77°C and the ENSO Region 3.4 anomaly has averaged -1.07°C. La Niña conditions will likely prevail at least through the winter.

The SOI was +20.69 today.

Today, the preliminary Arctic Oscillation (AO) figure was -1.579.

On January 16 the MJO was in Phase 4 at an amplitude of 1.143 (RMM). The January 15-adjusted amplitude was 1.148.

Following a significant stratospheric warming event, the stratosphere is now cooling. The cooling will likely accelerate during the second half of January. As is typical for vortex-splitting events, the major piece of the polar vortex migrated to Eurasia. The end result has been an absence of severe cold in much of North America.

The significant December 16-17 snowstorm during what has been a blocky December suggests that seasonal snowfall prospects have increased especially from north of Philadelphia into southern New England. At New York City, there is a high probability based on historic cases that an additional 20" or more snow will accumulate after December. Were blocking to disappear, snowfall prospects would diminish.

Based on sensitivity analysis applied to the latest guidance, there is an implied 83% probability that New York City will have a warmer than normal January. January will likely finish with a mean temperature near 35.2°.

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...