Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,617
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

January 2021


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

They key is how does it evolve...does the main vortex go into Canada? If it goes to Eurasia again, then I'd rather not even.

Yes but there's a decent shot for us.  I saw that thing on the winter of 28-29 from DT tweet.  Intriuging in that the coldest air was to our west but we were cold enough and I would think a lot of swfe and Bs in that patter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Cyclone-68 said:

Does wind chill even matter at that temperature?

Lol - 

In a practical real setting ?   No much ...  If one is not sufficiently protected in an air mass of that gelid amber, they are over the death threshold -  like... the body has frozen solid, and the soul's essence long receded back into quantum information paradox that argues nothing is lost and destroyed in the real Natural universe ...and then the wind blows ?

 Doesn't matter - haha... 

 

  • Like 2
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, mahk_webstah said:

Yes but there's a decent shot for us.  I saw that thing on the winter of 28-29 from DT tweet.  Intriuging in that the coldest air was to our west but we were cold enough and I would think a lot of swfe and Bs in that patter.

Boston had normal snow, but I don't know how sharp of a gradient there was to the north.

I'm just tired of people raving over a phenomenon that hoards the cold on the other side of the globe 7/10 times.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

S shore had the most....down near Norwell, Pembroke and Marshfield was ground zero.

I have to disagree with that assessment, especially if spotters used the 6 hour clearing method with many of those storms throughout that intense period. I can prove it with real data who had more snow on the ground. Boxford, MA actually comes in with 48-50" on ground at the highest depth by mid February even Newburyport.at 48".

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Greg said:

I have to disagree with that assessment, especially if spotters used the 6 hour clearing method with many of those storms throughout that intense period. I can prove it with real data who had more snow on the ground. Boxford, MA actually comes in with 48-50" on ground at the highest depth by mid February even Newburyport.at 48".

Disagree.

Prove it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, dryslot said:

Once you even get into the minus 20's, Its hard to tell the difference from there on up.

Yes around here cuz it doesn’t get a whole lot colder than the -30’s(which is plenty brutal).  But -60 on up is just insane, and you’d know the difference between that and -20 imo real quick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WinterWolf said:

Yes around here cuz it doesn’t get a whole lot colder than the -30’s(which is plenty brutal).  But -60 on up is just insane, and you’d know the difference between that and -20 imo real quick. 

I rode the county around Fort Kent at -35°F before, Wasn't a very good time for my heated shield to shat the bed.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have a hypothesis that I'd like to test for the next upcoming weeks: I think if New England is to get any decent snows, the primary needs to track at or north of Detroit. Anything lower will be a whiff because of the strong, southern block. Just posting this here to verify later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Links don't work, but I know for a fact max depths of near 4'+ were on the south shore.

I've checked Coop of Brockton, Beechwood, Bridgewater, Plymouth/Kingston area. Haven't see anything go over 4 feet.

https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/pub/orders/IPS/IPS-176575A0-3AE2-4A95-A3DD-E1286F5DCB0D-wxc3.pdf

Station: BOXFORD 2.4 S, MA US US1MAES0012 Observation Time Temperature: Unknown Observation Time Precipitation: Unknown




24 Hour Amounts Ending at
Observation Time:

   Date/Precip/Snowfall/ Depth

2015/02/01   0.00     0.0        21.0
2015/02/02   0.33     6.6        34.5
2015/02/04   0.00     0.0        33.0
2015/02/05   0.13     0.1        30.0
2015/02/06   0.02     0.9        31.0
2015/02/07   0.00     0.0        28.0
2015/02/08   0.33     5.5        31.5
2015/02/09   0.29     5.8        37.0
2015/02/10   0.26     7.8        44.0
2015/02/11   0.00     0.0        42.0
2015/02/12   T T       0.0        40.0
2015/02/13   0.08     1.5        39.0
2015 /02 /4   0.00     0.0        39.0
2015/02/15   0.78    12.0      50.0
2015/02/16   0.02     0.6       50.0
2015/02 /17  0.00     0.0       48.0
2015/02/1     T T       0.0       45.0
2015/02/19  0.06     1.5       45.0
2015/02/20   T          0.1       43.0
2015/02/21   0.00     0.0       42.0
2015/02/22   0.29     2.1       42.0
2015/02/23   T T       0.0       35.0
2015/02/24   0.00     0.0       30.0
2015/02/25   0.04     0.8       30.0
2015/02/26   0.00     0.0        29.5
2015/02/27   T           0.1       29.5
2015/02/28   0.00      0.0       28.5

Summary  Precip: 3.06   Total Snowfall: 52.4

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Greg said:

I've checked Brockton, Bridgewater, Plymouth/Kingston area. Haven't see anything so far eclipse 4'.

Those satellite images aren't going to be perfect. Trust me, I live here and work in Andover. I remember that year better than my own anniversary date. The jack was near me to about Norwell. I'm not just saying that because I live here and biased. You had 30"+ in the long duration event and over 15" from the event after. N shore didn't have that. They had near 20" in NBT in the 2/15 event, but not the long duration one.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Henry's Weather said:

I have a hypothesis that I'd like to test for the next upcoming weeks: I think if New England is to get any decent snows, the primary needs to track at or north of Detroit. Anything lower will be a whiff because of the strong, southern block. Just posting this here to verify later.

Well, the 0z Euro made a dramatic shift for the 26-27th from its 12z run when it sent the system to Bermuda.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Henry's Weather said:

I have a hypothesis that I'd like to test for the next upcoming weeks: I think if New England is to get any decent snows, the primary needs to track at or north of Detroit. Anything lower will be a whiff because of the strong, southern block. Just posting this here to verify later.

May very well be the case.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Greg said:

I've checked Brockton, Bridgewater, Plymouth/Kingston area. Haven't see anything so far eclipse 4'.

*IPS-176575A0-3AE2-4A95-A3DD-E1286F5DCB0D-wxc3.pdf

GHCND_US1MAES0012_2015-2-1.pdf

We're just going to have to agree to disagree. I live north of Boston and have a jackpot fetish, so its not like I was have a vested interest in claiming that the s shore was slightly better off in the most prolific snowfall period in SNE history.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...