Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,598
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    PublicWorks143
    Newest Member
    PublicWorks143
    Joined

January 2021 Medium/Longterm Pattern Discussion.


AMZ8990
 Share

Recommended Posts

12z updated...

Such a range of options from the 12z suite for the 8/9th system.  Going to depend on the angle that the systems takes.  The GFS is very progressive and does a near loop to loop over Arkansas.  To me, the para looks very realistic and matches the ICON very well.  The CMC is a bit strung out.  This is almost like trying to predict where a hurricane makes landfall while running parallel to the coast.  The slightest degree of change in regards to angle of entry....changes forecasts by dozens and dozens of miles.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Second storm is going to be tough to forecast.  The system for the 8th has trended SE over time.  Modeling is struggling with the block right now.  Like BNA says, just get the track right, and we will worry about the rest later.

As long as we are tracking something south of us at this point that’s all we can ask for.


.
  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, PowellVolz said:


As long as we are tracking something south of us at this point that’s all we can ask for.


.

Debatable whether the second system will be south of us.  The 12z CMC is not.  I don't trust the GFS with the first system, and that first system sets the wave pattern that will allow the second system to cut or go underneath.  I would think both systems go south, but absolutely not written in stone yet for the second.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Again, I think we need to be very careful with the GFS.  It trended a system from WV to nearly Colorado last week.  Right now, the trend could be the opposite.  I don't think it is handling the block well.  The 12z GFS Para on Pivotal looks a lot more reasonable.  As soon as one see the loop to loop(GFS regular) in Arkansas for the first system...have to think that solution is less likely.  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Daniel Boone said:

Awfully close to calling for a big dog...

This usually doesn't work out well, but I like your boldness....  haha

I never thought we'd work into something this quickly.  I am excited to see where the pattern heads and already having multiple periods to track is a great....... 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

Debatable whether the second system will be south of us.  The 12z CMC is not.  I don't trust the GFS with the first system, and that first system sets the wave pattern that will allow the second system to cut or go underneath.  I would think both systems go south, but absolutely not written in stone yet for the second.  

You could have stopped here and I'd have been on board.  It's a pretty wretched model.  Good point on the HUGE adjustments on a recent system.  The move it made from having snow here to actually snowing in west Texas to Missouri was a colossal jump.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Carvers Gap said:

Debatable whether the second system will be south of us.  The 12z CMC is not.  I don't trust the GFS with the first system, and that first system sets the wave pattern that will allow the second system to cut or go underneath.  I would think both systems go south, but absolutely not written in stone yet for the second.  

  Good point, especially with the  Canadian doing that. The Canadian suite has performed well this fall/winter.

       However, I still think what u alluded to yesterday has merrit regarding model's adjusting to strong blocking. Just not alot that's been ingested in them regarding that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And let me say, some GREAT trends on modeling at 12z!  I just don't trust the GFS right now.  Toggle(back in time) the first system as it goes through North Carolina - just all over the place.  That said, the GFS has not been terrible until last week.  Certainly looks like modeling wants to produce a Miller A for system two.  Just with seven days to go, going to be tough to nail down a system while modeling is still adjusting to the block.  Again though, good trends.  As expected at this range...details are still up for grabs.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

And let me say, some GREAT trends on modeling at 12z!  I just don't trust the GFS right now.  Toggle(back in time) the first system as it goes through North Carolina - just all over the place.  That said, the GFS has not been terrible until last week.  Certainly looks like modeling wants to produce a Miller A for system two.  Just with seven days to go, going to be tough to nail down a system while modeling is still adjusting to the block.  Again though, good trends.  As expected at this range...details are still up for grabs.

I think we'd all like to see the traditional GFS go progressive and further SE for storm 2.  At least when we see this we know the usual correction is coming...

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

Again, I think we need to be very careful with the GFS.  It trended a system from WV to nearly Colorado last week.  Right now, the trend could be the opposite.  I don't think it is handling the block well.  The 12z GFS Para on Pivotal looks a lot more reasonable.  As soon as one see the loop to loop(GFS regular) in Arkansas for the first system...have to think that solution is less likely.  

That loop to loop feature showing on the (GFS regular) has popped up multiple times this winter.  I Wonder if there is an underlying issue within the model that’s causing that feature to show up so frequently this year.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, AMZ8990 said:

That loop to loop feature showing on the (GFS regular) has popped up multiple times this winter.  I Wonder if there is an underlying issue within the model that’s causing that feature to show up so frequently this year.

Has it actually verified?  I don't the answer to that.  LOL.  Sometimes systems with very little steering current will do that.  Sometimes modeling just doesn't know where to put the low.  It happens sometimes with systems when they hit the benchmark for NE winter storms.  Hey, maybe Memphis is the new winter storm benchmark!  In all seriousness, good luck to you west TN folks getting something.  You all have definitely waiter your turn!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Carvers Gap said:

Has it actually verified?  I don't the answer to that.  LOL.  Sometimes systems with very little steering current will do that.  Sometimes modeling just doesn't know where to put the low.  It happens sometimes with systems when they hit the benchmark for NE winter storms.  Hey, maybe Memphis is the new winter storm benchmark!  In all seriousness, good luck to you west TN folks getting something.  You all have definitely waiter your turn!

  Shoot naw it hasn’t, just remembered seeing it on a GFS forecast for a system we tracked a few weeks back.  Just thought it was odd we were seeing it multiple times on the GFS this year.  And I hope so man, been a long 3 years without snow!!  

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...