Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Dec 29-Jan 2 potential storm event


Brian D
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Malacka11 said:

I'm not even talking about getting into that shmexy pink swath, but surely laying down even a couple inches of snow in LOT would help with temperatures for wave II right?

It'd be better than not having snow on the ground, but the impact is often overstated.  And assuming the snow from wave 1 doesn't melt in the meantime, which is a distinct possibility.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, IllinoisWedges said:

Euro a bit closer to being WEDGE in IN/OH

Euro has upper 50s dews in the warm sector with SSE winds. Develops a secondary low over Indiana. Honestly that run verbatim is kinda similar to 12/1/18, just farther east. Obviously wouldn’t expect much at all, but it is something to watch with the low looking to track pretty far west. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If we're to get a closed off low lifting close to due north like the Euro run will also have to watch for the magnitude of the high pressure to the north. The setup offered by the Euro is somewhat similar to 12/28/15 (Edit: the event referenced by@WI_SNOWSTORM), though that one had a stronger HP to the north/northeast. Should the surface ridging extending back west across the northern Lakes trend stronger, that could play a big role in sleet vs freezing rain distribution.

 

12z run verbatim looks icier farther north than 00z run did without looking at the ice accum output, still borderline IP vs ZR for a time around 12z north of I-80 using 925 mb temps and winds as a proxy. You could also keep the surface (away from Lake Michigan) at or below freezing for a longer duration with that odd due north track because that would prolong the period of northeasterly sfc winds and associated evaporative cooling. Would be an impactful mixed precip event for the LOT CWA as modeled on the Euro, especially north half and away from Chicago shore.

 

Lots of time to go on this one and pretty much a wide variety of outcomes on the table.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

If we're to get a closed off low lifting close to due north like the Euro run will also have to watch for the magnitude of the high pressure to the north. The setup offered by the Euro is somewhat similar to 12/28/15 (Edit: the event referenced by@WI_SNOWSTORM), though that one had a stronger HP to the north/northeast. Should the surface ridging extending back west across the northern Lakes trend stronger, that could play a big role in sleet vs freezing rain distribution.

 

12z run verbatim looks icier farther north than 00z run did without looking at the ice accum output, still borderline IP vs ZR for a time around 12z north of I-80 using 925 mb temps and winds as a proxy. You could also keep the surface (away from Lake Michigan) at or below freezing for a longer duration with that odd due north track because that would prolong the period of northeasterly sfc winds and associated evaporative cooling. Would be an impactful mixed precip event for the LOT CWA as modeled on the Euro, especially north half and away from Chicago shore.

 

Lots of time to go on this one and pretty much a wide variety of outcomes on the table.

 

 

 

 

I was a little surprised it changed to rain as quick as it did given the e/ne sfc winds as you mentioned.  That is quite a surge of warm air off the deck though so maybe that is why the low level cold layer eroded so quickly even with the e/ne surface winds.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Looking at the 12z EPS, wave 1 had a pretty big adjustment south similar to the operational. There's substantial west to east spread on the sfc low placement for wave 2, with the mean actually bumping east of the 06z.

 

Another component we'll have to watch is the possibility of wave 2 getting sheared out in confluent flow to the northeast, which could tug the sfc low track more northeast with time depending on when that occurs. The EPS mean favors this sort of setup, so there's a decent amount of member support for the wave closing off, occluding and then shearing northeast. So many complexities to the setup.

 

Edit: Included wave 2 in 2nd sentence of 1st paragraph

 

 

 

 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was a little surprised it changed to rain as quick as it did given the e/ne sfc winds as you mentioned.  That is quite a surge of warm air off the deck though so maybe that is why the low level cold layer eroded so quickly even with the e/ne surface winds.

If you recall the Feb 2019 icing, that's something we got burned by. Much of the guidance kept insisting on warming the boundary layer to above freezing even though surface winds were progged to remain northeast/east-northeast at the surface. Putting down snow cover and not melting it going into the event is a wild card that could point toward sfc temps verifying colder if we get a scenario like shown on the 12z Euro.

 

 

 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...