Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,586
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    LopezElliana
    Newest Member
    LopezElliana
    Joined

Dec 29-Jan 2 potential storm event


Brian D
 Share

Recommended Posts

We got a FRAM reference in the LOT afd.  

 

Area Forecast Discussion
National Weather Service Chicago/Romeoville, IL
254 PM CST Thu Dec 31 2020

.SHORT TERM...
254 PM CST

Through Friday night...

Near term through tonight...

Quiet conditions are expected through tonight we close out 2020
and welcome in 2021. For details on Friday`s winter weather event,
see the following paragraph. Large scale subsidence over the area
this afternoon appears to be suppressing what was a fairly
shallow stratus deck under a 2kft inversion. Some stratocumulus
has filled in where snow cover is less common south of I-80, but
should erode with the loss of daytime heating. Confidence is low
on whether stratus will redevelop under the inversion tonight or
remain confined to pockets. A narrow window of a few hours exists
this evening where temps may quickly drop over the snow cover
north of I-80 before thickening high clouds moderate conditions by
later in the evening. WAA will ensure overnight with increasing
cloud cover, allowing temps to likely rise a couple degrees.

Friday...

From a "big picture" view, our thinking with the upcoming storm
system is unchanged. As a Gulf of Mexico low pressure system tracks
northeastward and along a line from just south of Springfield, IL,
to Indianapolis, IN, a broad area of precipitation will spread
across northern Illinois. With the low-level thermal profile
becoming progressively cooler and deeper with northward extent,
precipitation types will range from all snow on the northern fringe
of the shield to freezing rain on the southern edge, with a sloppy
wintry mix in-between (and right over the Chicago metropolitan
area). As the freezing line inches northward Friday afternoon,
freezing rain and the wintry mix should convert to "plain" rain for
areas generally along and south of I-88 (though the exact location
may not be known until, well, it happens). All areas should convert
back to snow as the low pulls away Friday evening. Total snow
accumulations should range from 1 to 4 inches generally along and
northwest of a line from Mendota to Bolingbrook to Evanston (highest
as one goes northwest). It`s worth noting the city of Chicago and
immediate shoreline may remain above freezing for much of this
event thanks to wind off the relatively warm lake, and hence only
see liquid rain.

Explicit output from the Freezing Rain Accumulation Model (FRAM)
with the outgoing forecast package topped 1/2 to even 2/3 an inch of
ice across central Illinois, including in Livingston and Ford
counties. At face value, those values seem too high, considering:

* A deep warm nose with max wet-bulb temperatures pushing +7 to +9 C
  (that`s rather extreme and should heat raindrops enough to prevent
  freezing upon falling into the near-surface sub-freezing layer)

* Precipitation rates pushing 0.1 to 0.2"/hr when freezing rain
  would be occurring, which would encourage run-off rather than
  freezing

* Relatively short period of time when trees, power lines, and
  elevated surfaces would be weighted down by ice given rising
  temperatures and switch-over to liquid rain.

As such, we manually lowered ice totals to max out in the range
from a quarter to third of an inch. While those values along would
not normally lead to widespread downed tree limbs and power
outages, breezy northeast winds of 25-35 mph could be the straw
that breaks the camel`s back. As such, we felt there was enough
justification to issue an Ice Storm Warning for Livingston and
Ford counties (ending at 6 PM CST, though actual freezing rain
should end after the noon hour). North and east of the Ice Storm
Warning, total ice up to a quarter inch is expected which may yet
lead to pockets of power outages and downed tree limbs when
combined with the wind.

Borchardt/Kluber

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Hoosier said:

* A deep warm nose with max wet-bulb temperatures pushing +7 to +9 C
  (that`s rather extreme and should heat raindrops enough to prevent
  freezing upon falling into the near-surface sub-freezing layer)

* Precipitation rates pushing 0.1 to 0.2"/hr when freezing rain
  would be occurring, which would encourage run-off rather than
  freezing

I'm confused by the statement on the warm layer here in regards to hindered ice accumulations as it seems that this would favor more freezing rain over sleet. I have trouble believing that warm raindrops at the surface make that much of a difference regarding ice accretion, but I'm also just an arm chair :weenie:. It's just that the amount of energy released by turning liquid water to ice is just SO much higher than cooling the liquid by a few degrees. Even if the rain drops are a toasty 9°C, the energy that's released by cooling the rain drops to 0°C is only ~10% of the energy released from freezing the liquid at 0°C to solid at 0°C.

I've definitely seen the high precip rates hinder accumulations though. I remember witnessing nearly an inch of rain fall in 3 hours with surface temps of 28°F~29°F and only receiving a light glaze.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Regarding what LOT said about the max temps in the warm layer aloft... 

If you look at the model progs of where the heavier band of ice is depicted, I wonder if the northern part of it would have a chance to accrete a little better/not waste as much precip.  The warm layer in that area maxes out more like 4-6C instead of 7-9C.  So in the LOT cwa, that would be a line from Pontiac-Kankakee-Valparaiso and maybe 10-20 miles north of there.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That's the first ice storm warning in likely over a decade for many of those ILX counties, mine included. I'm going to try getting some time lapses of the accumulating ice.

I know the NAM seems to be the outlier with the northward extent of the warm air, but every recent shot at ice IMBY has always been killed by warmer than modeled temps. Even so, at least a few hours of freezing rain looks to be nearly certain here, so it should be enough to make the trees sparkly.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ILX with a rather detailed AFD for a change

 

Quote

.SYNOPSIS...
Issued at 417 PM CST Thu Dec 31 2020

Clouds will continue building overnight, as the next weather
system moves into the Midwest. This system will build from the
south and progress northward through Illinois overnight through
Friday. Freezing rain is expected on the leading edge, with Ice
Storm Warnings in effect for portions of central Illinois, while
Winter Weather Advisories are in effect for much of the remainder
of Illinois. Hazardous, and dangerous conditions, will persist
through Friday, with the possibility of power outages around the
area. As the system tracks through southern portion of Illinois,
rainfall should begin taking over across southeast Illinois, while
a mixed precipitation continues northwest of the I-55 corridor.
This system exits Friday night, however with another system
tracking through the southeast US Saturday, this could bring light
precipitation to the Midwest as excessive moisture remains.

&&

.SHORT TERM...(This evening through Friday night)
ISSUED AT 417 PM CST Thu Dec 31 2020

Lots to discuss, therefore the late products:

A deep upper level trof is carrying a large Low pressure system
across the far southern Plains, near the Gulf of Mexico off the se
Texas coastline. This is the system that will track northeast
through the overnight, impacting central Illinois and the Midwest
to ring in the new year. Currently looking at sfc observations and
seeing most locations throughout central and southern Illinois
sitting below freezing. This is the key component to precip type
for the overnight moisture. As the Low pressure system lifts
through the Mississippi River Valley, the excessive moisture
content will continue to lift with the core. With some precip
already edging out ahead of the system, this will work through
moistening up the lower atmosphere and continue leading
precipitation northward. Forecast soundings indicate that although
the sfc temperatures will be below freezing at the onset of
precip, the mid level will be much warmer. This will melt all
frozen precip in the mid levels, however as this falls, the level
near the sfc will be below freezing. This depth appears to only be
in excess of maybe 2kft, which would not typically be enough to
provide a full refreeze of water droplets. As these still liquid
droplets reach the below freezing ground (as indicated by frost
depth readings from this morning), they will freeze on contact.
Frost depth readings this morning, in areas where Ice Storm
Warning is in effect were from 1-6 inches deep. Here at the ILX
office, we reported a 4 inch depth this morning. This is
sufficient enough for freezing rain development. The leading edge
of this system is expected to fall as all freezing rain overnight
into Friday morning. With heaviest precipitation arriving towards
morning north of the I-72 corridor, this is highlighted as the
best chance for ice accumulations up to 0.40 inches of ice
accumulation possible. This will create dangerous and hazardous
conditions throughout the region, as travel would be nearly
impossible and damage to trees and power lines could create
widespread power outages. As the system tracks northward, warmer
air will begin to filter into the area Friday morning into the
afternoon, changing freezing rainfall to rainfall...however this
is only expected to occur se of the I-55 corridor. Mixed precip is
expected from the I-55 corridor through the Illinois River Valley.
Nw of the Illinois River Valley is forecast to remain cold enough
that freezing rain will likely prevail, before a change to
snowfall as the backside of the Low pressure system begins
shifting to the lower Great Lakes late Friday night. This could
bring up to two inches of snowfall around GBG, while decreasing to
near 1 inch along a line extending from Rushville to Peoria. This
system is forecast to be out of the area by 06-09z Saturday
(late Friday night).

 

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, fluoronium said:

That's the first ice storm warning in likely over a decade for many of those ILX counties, mine included. I'm going to try getting some time lapses of the accumulating ice.

I know the NAM seems to be the outlier with the northward extent of the warm air, but every recent shot at ice IMBY has always been killed by warmer than modeled temps. Even so, at least a few hours of freezing rain looks to be nearly certain here, so it should be enough to make the trees sparkly.

Yeah, I can't remember the exact year of the last one but it was definitely over 10 years ago. I'm thinking 2007 for some reason. Think we ended up with around .3" here and can't remember if that was the one that hit Jacksonville pretty hard with closer to .6" or if it was another system.

 

We've definitely been overdue though.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, WeatherMonger said:

Yeah, I can't remember the exact year of the last one but it was definitely over 10 years ago. I'm thinking 2007 for some reason. Think we ended up with around .3" here and can't remember if that was the one that hit Jacksonville pretty hard with closer to .6" or if it was another system.

 

We've definitely been overdue though.

Nice to see you back man! It's been too long. Last significant ice I remember here in my county was like 2009 I think. Have had icing events since but they didn't pan out well or weren't excessive. Definitely nervous that temps could surge above freezing. Daytime ice events can be tricky. But I like we maintain northerly sfc flow which should help.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, StormChaser4Life said:

Nice to see you back man! It's been too long. Last significant ice I remember here in my county was like 2009 I think. Have had icing events since but they didn't pan out well or weren't excessive. Definitely nervous that temps could surge above freezing. Daytime ice events can be tricky. But I like we maintain northerly sfc flow which should help.

I can't root this one on, not this year lol.

 

I'm just glad there is something to follow for a change, been a very boring year of weather here. Add in everything else going on and I just need an escape :snowwindow:

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It looks like the HRRR started drinking early on this New Year's Eve.  ;)

Not sure what it is doing in northern Indiana.  At first I thought maybe it is using heavier precip as a reason to warm temps above 32, but that doesn't explain why the area south of there is still freezing rain.  In reality, it should be a more uniform look without plain rain embedded in the freezing rain shield.

HRRRNIL_prec_ptype_018.png.b8b0348a79d68ee6d0b4d823daefd71b.png

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Hoosier said:

It looks like the HRRR started drinking early on this New Year's Eve.  ;)

Not sure what it is doing in northern Indiana.  At first I thought maybe it is using heavier precip as a reason to warm temps above 32, but that doesn't explain why the area south of there is still freezing rain.  In reality, it should be a more uniform look without plain rain embedded in the freezing rain shield.

HRRRNIL_prec_ptype_018.png.b8b0348a79d68ee6d0b4d823daefd71b.png

 

If nothing else it has been consistent in showing a donut of plain rain in Northern Indiana. Not saying it's right, but it is interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shame that we can't get a wide snow band given these surface conditions.  But oh, that's not how it works.

il_sfc.gif.30c853121c8bc38b16df900132762a70.gif

Probably gonna stay in as much as possible tomorrow.  Even as temps rise to/just above freezing, the paved surfaces will likely lag and be a lingering disaster (especially untreated ones). 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the 21z RAP is right, the only areas getting above freezing through the event are basically southeast of I-55 and along the Lake Michigan shore. I noticed that in our AFD, mentioned all areas along and south of I-88 warming to above freezing. I think that's probably too optimistic except along the Lake Michigan shore and a bit inland of there, and obviously if something like the RAP is right, ice accumulations could end up higher than forecast.

 

[mention=14]Hoosier[/mention] made a good point earlier about accretion rates potentially being higher farther north where the warm nose is not as warm. That's something to watch and another reason to be concerned about some locations overperforming ice wise. Another thing we'll have to watch observation wise is how cold the low level cold wedge remains. The December 28 2015 event that's been discussed verified colder at that level than model forecasts, and if something like that happens tomorrow, also could have a zone that stays sleet for a while until flipping back to snow.

 

Finally, was a bit surprised my office and DVN didn't extend the advisories to the northern tier counties staying snow, since it seems they have solid potential to come in at near typical advisory criteria for snow anyway.

 

Will be an interesting event to watch unfold.

 

 

 

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

If the 21z RAP is right, the only areas getting above freezing through the event are basically southeast of I-55 and along the Lake Michigan shore. I noticed that in our AFD, mentioned all areas along and south of I-88 warming to above freezing. I think that's probably too optimistic except along the Lake Michigan shore and a bit inland of there, and obviously if something like the RAP is right, ice accumulations could end up higher than forecast.

 

[mention=14]Hoosier[/mention] made a good point earlier about accretion rates potentially being higher farther north where the warm nose is not as warm. That's something to watch and another reason to be concerned about some locations overperforming ice wise. Another thing we'll have to watch observation wise is how cold the low level cold wedge remains. The December 28 2015 event that's been discussed verified colder at that level than model forecasts, and if something like that happens tomorrow, also could have a zone that stays sleet for a while until flipping back to snow.

 

Finally, was a bit surprised my office and DVN didn't extend the advisories to the northern tier counties staying snow, since it seems they have solid potential to come in at near typical advisory criteria for snow anyway.

 

Will be an interesting event to watch unfold.

 

 

 

 

Yeah, 12/28/15 ended up with more sleet here than what it had been looking like.  It reminded me a bit of what I experienced with GHD in LAF, just not as intense.  

Been looking back at previous setups and comparing them to this one.  As far as 12/28/15, that had a stronger surface high and also had a stronger surface low than what we have this time.

usfntsfc2015122818.gif.a04d8ef910471dc76a151a3dbf4b58dd.gif

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

If the 21z RAP is right, the only areas getting above freezing through the event are basically southeast of I-55 and along the Lake Michigan shore. I noticed that in our AFD, mentioned all areas along and south of I-88 warming to above freezing. I think that's probably too optimistic except along the Lake Michigan shore and a bit inland of there, and obviously if something like the RAP is right, ice accumulations could end up higher than forecast.

 

[mention=14]Hoosier[/mention] made a good point earlier about accretion rates potentially being higher farther north where the warm nose is not as warm. That's something to watch and another reason to be concerned about some locations overperforming ice wise. Another thing we'll have to watch observation wise is how cold the low level cold wedge remains. The December 28 2015 event that's been discussed verified colder at that level than model forecasts, and if something like that happens tomorrow, also could have a zone that stays sleet for a while until flipping back to snow.

 

Finally, was a bit surprised my office and DVN didn't extend the advisories to the northern tier counties staying snow, since it seems they have solid potential to come in at near typical advisory criteria for snow anyway.

 

Will be an interesting event to watch unfold.

 

 

 

 

Are there concerns ice accretion will be significant in the northern tier counties or just snow mostly?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Are there concerns ice accretion will be significant in the northern tier counties or just snow mostly?
I think that it looks like mostly snow and maybe some sleet up there and I guess that's why no advisory, though since there will be some travel impacts, thought they might have erred on the side of caution.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RCNYILWX said:

If the 21z RAP is right, the only areas getting above freezing through the event are basically southeast of I-55 and along the Lake Michigan shore. I noticed that in our AFD, mentioned all areas along and south of I-88 warming to above freezing. I think that's probably too optimistic except along the Lake Michigan shore and a bit inland of there, and obviously if something like the RAP is right, ice accumulations could end up higher than forecast.

 

[mention=14]Hoosier[/mention] made a good point earlier about accretion rates potentially being higher farther north where the warm nose is not as warm. That's something to watch and another reason to be concerned about some locations overperforming ice wise. Another thing we'll have to watch observation wise is how cold the low level cold wedge remains. The December 28 2015 event that's been discussed verified colder at that level than model forecasts, and if something like that happens tomorrow, also could have a zone that stays sleet for a while until flipping back to snow.

 

Finally, was a bit surprised my office and DVN didn't extend the advisories to the northern tier counties staying snow, since it seems they have solid potential to come in at near typical advisory criteria for snow anyway.

 

Will be an interesting event to watch unfold.

 

 

 

 

As someone who lives in the northern tier of LOT counties, I agree. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WeatherMonger said:

NAM comes in less bullish yet still alarming. I'll take all the ice they can give if the power stays on. 

 

zr_acc.us_mw.png

Yikes!  Significant shift north.  Wouldn't be surprised if the edge of the precip shield clips us.  At least winds won't be strong here.

EDIT: Nevermind.  Previous NAM run has the precip shield clip us too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...