Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,598
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    PublicWorks143
    Newest Member
    PublicWorks143
    Joined

Major LES event-December 24-27


 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, BuffaloWeather said:

RGEM is huge hit. at 1:10 20" bullseye over my place. Kuch 26" :snowwindow:

image.thumb.png.042f7410d2f9184b1bae32521171f1a6.png

Last frame still going strong

image.thumb.png.81d080c65a2b569b8776bb0dab569645.png

I liked the RGEM run.  Nice stall over central Erie for quite a while.  Puts me right in the northern fringe of the band.  Would rather be there than the southern fringe of a north towns band.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Thinksnow18 said:

So the local WIVB net has 4-8 for Hamburg north and 2-4  southern Niagara-far northern Erie... with a lake effect snow warning...where the  NWS has 7-17...I want to become a meteorologist 

The warning was only issued 2 hours ago.  These forecast graphics they have now were done hours ago.  Maybe by 5 or 6pm news they will have updated. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, SouthBuffaloSteve said:

I liked the RGEM run.  Nice stall over central Erie for quite a while.  Puts me right in the northern fringe of the band.  Would rather be there than the southern fringe of a north towns band.  

Well...my guess is it makes it into the north towns fir at least 4 to 6 hours late evening on Christmas. That probably where myself and that lakeeffectkid get our shot

Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, Thinksnow18 said:

So the local WIVB net has 4-8 for Hamburg north and 2-4  southern Niagara-far northern Erie... with a lake effect snow warning...where the  NWS has 7-17...I want to become a meteorologist 

Best part is their mesoscale models show the best Synoptic snow from the Southtowns to the north which is the exact opposite of where the they are showing the most falling lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Thinksnow18 said:

So the local WIVB net has 4-8 for Hamburg north and 2-4  southern Niagara-far northern Erie... with a lake effect snow warning...where the  NWS has 7-17...I want to become a meteorologist 

You of all people should understand this difficulty in this scenario.  You have access to every piece of data that they do.  What's your call then??

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s definitely a hard forecast to make for the public because just a few mile shift can make such a huge difference especially in this scenario. My thing is just why show a model that’s targeting northern areas and overlay the lowest totals there? It just doesn’t look right to me. No doubt they have a tough job ahead the next 2 days. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, ayuud11 said:

I don't see anything wrong with wivb's forecast i just watched Todd's 5pm forecast and he was calling for anywhere from 8-14" across Erie county which is inline to what the models and the NWS are calling for.

Todd wasn’t working today I don’t think. He was calling for 8-14” County wide yesterday. Bagilini is working tonight and he definitley did call for 4-8” in the southtowns and 2-4” in the Northtowns as TS said. Really nitpicking at this point though. Still time for them to up it as the forecast evolves if necessary. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, lakeeffectkid383 said:

Todd wasn’t working today I don’t think. He was calling for 8-14” County wide yesterday. Bagilini is working tonight and he definitley did call for 4-8” in the southtowns and 2-4” in the Northtowns as TS said. Really nitpicking at this point though. Still time for them to up it as the forecast evolves if necessary. 

I just went to the WIVb website and the weather page...it was Andrew still and his forecast is polar opposite of the NWS forecast...he expects the lake band to be in the city early Christmas Day and then south to ski country by evening...which is the polar opposite of the NWS forecast of the lake band shifting north by the evening and intensifying over the metro north towns...on another note on their website they have the warnings for each county and it appears the NWS has upped the totals from 7 to 17” to 9 to 17”...WIVb has the old one. If I remember correctly the storm they forecast back in January of 18 they also did a poor job with it even when all guidance suggested otherwise. They’re slipping.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, SouthBuffaloSteve said:

Ch7 just posted an updated accumulations map.  Very conservative through Saturday afternoon!  This is synoptic and lake effect combo.  In fact they are giving Rochester more snow then Buffalo???

 

21370872-431F-4ADC-BFA3-22F260DD61AB.jpeg

That’s a pretty odd map. I’ll agree with that. A lot of weird shit to unpack with that one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DeltaT13 said:

That’s a pretty odd map. I’ll agree with that. A lot of weird shit to unpack with that one. 

 

5 minutes ago, SouthBuffaloSteve said:

Ch7 just posted an updated accumulations map.  Very conservative through Saturday afternoon!  This is synoptic and lake effect combo.  In fact they are giving Rochester more snow then Buffalo???

 

21370872-431F-4ADC-BFA3-22F260DD61AB.jpeg

That’s just one model, not saying it’s going to be wrong as you and Delta stated I think this ones gonna have some curveballs, but you could easily find models that show significantly more than that and I think using the RPM model (or any other singular model)  as your official “forecast” for snow totals on air is a pretty poor look. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Thinksnow18 said:

WIVB is the same! I’m not sure but their in house models must be their own versions of things. 

“The RPM model is our in-house real-time forecast model, and the lettersstands for Rapid Precision Mesoscale model. The output allows the display of the latest forecast information on our television graphics. Themodel uses the very successful Weather Research and Forecast model as its forecast engine, a collaborative effort between a host of government and academic agencies. The model is run every three hours out to a period of 51 hours, allowing frequent updates to our forecast products, most important in critical weather situations. Like any weather forecast model, it has its ups and downs, but overall it has been very helpful for our weather forecast efforts.”

It uses the WRF as its engine which isn’t a terrible model. I often look at them in lake effect situations. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, lakeeffectkid383 said:

 

That’s just one model, not saying it’s going to be wrong as you and Delta stated I think this ones gonna have some curveballs, but you could easily find models that show significantly more than that and I think using the RPM model (or any other singular model)  as your official “forecast” for snow totals on air is a pretty poor look. 

It’s one thing if the stations “on air” do a comparison of the model output to show the general public the wide range of forecast  possibilities... But Ch7 literally just posted that to their Facebook with the title “Here’s our updated forecast map, the bullseye is now well south of Buffalo”. That’s very misleading in my opinion and giving zero credit to the Buffalo NWS.  In fact watching the loop they are saying all of our snow will come early Friday from the synoptic and we will see zero lake effect in Buffalo...  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SouthBuffaloSteve said:

It’s one thing if the stations “on air” do a comparison of the model output to show the general public the wide range of forecast  possibilities... But Ch7 literally just posted that to their Facebook with the title “Here’s our updated forecast map, the bullseye is now well south of Buffalo”. That’s very misleading in my opinion and giving zero credit to the Buffalo NWS.  In fact watching the loop they are saying all of our snow will come early Friday from the synoptic and we will see zero lake effect in Buffalo...  

That’s cause it’s some young girl who seems like it’s her first week on her first job as a meteorologist. Just use your in house model run as your “forecast” and throw everything else out the window. Lol. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...