Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Upstate/Eastern New York


 Share

Recommended Posts

5 minutes ago, wolfie09 said:

Rgem seems pretty locked in with this event, only time will tell if it's correct or not..WRF models have this more of a NW event while Canadian guidance has more of a WNW..

Last 3 runs of the regional Canadian..

snku_acc.us_ne (37).png

snku_acc.us_ne (38).png

snku_acc.us_ne (39).png

Yeah, and the totals were lowered each time, lol, as the 12Z has me getting 1".  Like I said, its just not gonna happen at least for my area, but your area, as usual is a lock for some kind of accumulation so congrats bro!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, wolfie09 said:

Rgem seems pretty locked in with this event, only time will tell if it's correct or not..WRF models have this more of a NW event while Canadian guidance has more of a WNW..

Last 3 runs of the regional Canadian..

snku_acc.us_ne (37).png

snku_acc.us_ne (38).png

snku_acc.us_ne (39).png

It looks more like a W wind flow on the Rgem. Looks awful for the Cuse. Syracuse Snow shield activated? The only thing we do well is warm above expected highs. 

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I stated yesterday RGEM doesn't really have a sustained flow..How many times have we seen this scenario before? Lol Band starts out westerly and shifts south as the system progresses east..It looks like a "westerly" event because the band is stronger out of the west and weakens as it heads south..

1124512426_11799697-75ba-4440-8a17-47793

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Like I stated yesterday RGEM doesn't really have a sustained flow..How many times have we seen this scenario before? Lol Band starts out westerly and shifts south as the system progresses east..It looks like a "westerly" event because the band is stronger out of the west and weakens as it heads south..
1124512426_11799697-75ba-4440-8a17-477936d7ac1d(1).gif.a47e7cfb488df791687b787315e2b332.gif&key=cc7011ac9a08f6a0830e79be968657f95e8380f4c21d39623b7ab157efcf4d6d
Why we even taking a model run verbatim?

Sent from my SM-G970U using Tapatalk

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Later tonight and Tuesday morning a secondary cold front will move
southeast across Lake Ontario. The convergence from the cold front
will merge with pre-existing lake generated convergence, allowing
for a brief burst of heavier snow to develop southeast of the lake.
Mesoscale model guidance also suggests a brief upstream connection
to Lake Huron during this time frame, giving an added boost to the
band southeast of Lake Ontario. Mesoscale model guidance including
the 3km NAM, WRF windows, and GEM show a good deal of spread on
where this band will develop initially. Pattern recognition and mean
boundary layer flow suggests this band should develop late tonight
in central Oswego County, then move south towards northern Cayuga
and eastern Wayne counties Tuesday morning, before weakening by
midday. Expect accumulations of 3-5 inches in this area tonight
through Tuesday, with most of that coming in a relatively short
window late tonight and Tuesday morning.

The western end of this band will likely move onshore from eastern
Niagara County into the Rochester area as well late tonight and
Tuesday morning, with 1-2 inches of accumulation expected. This may
impact the Tuesday morning commute in the Rochester area.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Later tonight and Tuesday morning a secondary cold front will move
southeast across Lake Ontario. The convergence from the cold front
will merge with pre-existing lake generated convergence, allowing
for a brief burst of heavier snow to develop southeast of the lake.
Mesoscale model guidance also suggests a brief upstream connection
to Lake Huron during this time frame, giving an added boost to the
band southeast of Lake Ontario. Mesoscale model guidance including
the 3km NAM, WRF windows, and GEM show a good deal of spread on
where this band will develop initially. Pattern recognition and mean
boundary layer flow suggests this band should develop late tonight
in central Oswego County, then move south towards northern Cayuga
and eastern Wayne counties Tuesday morning, before weakening by
midday. Expect accumulations of 3-5 inches in this area tonight
through Tuesday, with most of that coming in a relatively short
window late tonight and Tuesday morning.

The western end of this band will likely move onshore from eastern
Niagara County into the Rochester area as well late tonight and
Tuesday morning, with 1-2 inches of accumulation expected. This may
impact the Tuesday morning commute in the Rochester area.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, rochesterdave said:

Earlier last week I jokingly wrote, “look out Chicago!” because I expected the then awesome looking snow potential to drift a little west, “indices being what they are”. Welp, here it is. Look out Minneapolis!image.thumb.png.8663a1f1d5d731f4f72ed49c45c8caff.png

The trend west wasn’t subtle.  It jumped quick.  I don’t see anything for the next 10 days synoptically.  Could get some backside LES of this, but that’s it for most of us. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, wolfie09 said:

Could be a surprise where ever this band decides to go..Hi rez Canadian with over 1/2" liquid in a few hours..

Last 2 runs of the HRRR( still snowing)..

qpf_acc.us_ne (18).png

qpf_acc.us_ne (19).png

Look at the second frame and you see where the band splits, thats exactly where I live, lol, so thats exactly what I'm expecting to happen cause it happens that way every event and I wouldn't even call this an event!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CNY-LES FREAK said:

Um, I don't think that was me whining by saying I suddenly live in a snow hole and I can't wait to move, lol! You do nothing but whine even when its snowing, lol!

Debatable... you're in denial.

I know I whine...when I catch myself I try to apologize. I don't think it's fair to say it's all I do. I like to have meteorological and funny, light-hearted discussion on here too.

There's no question I've been extremely disappointed with the 3 winters (2.5) that I've lived in Upstate NY. They've sucked relative to average for the locations I am in.

  • Like 3
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...