Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,759
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Cabby
    Newest Member
    Cabby
    Joined

December 16/17 Winter Event


MN Transplant
 Share

Recommended Posts

We’re not going to know where this is headed until the storm is here. Models have virtually zero agreement on how to handle the high to the NE, the primary in the Ohio valley, and in turn, the SLP / 850 low track. Just the slightest over amplification or under amplification of the primary in the OV throws the entire storm into limbo. 
 

Yes, this often doesn’t end well... but the overwhelming majority of ensembles look much better than the OP with the location of the SLP. The mouth of the bay versus 50 miles offshore makes or breaks the entire storm for the eastern half of the cwa 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, yoda said:

 

 

I hate to say it, but that is an unbelievably good catch by Eric. I’ve spent a lot of time focusing on model disco at both the synoptic and mesoscale the last several days, but at a regional parsing, and not at full broad scale look at the impending 5H pattern. Discernible differences like that can make or break a forecast. Those s/w progressions, especially one as small and later developing can have major downstream implications. PSU did a fantastic job outlining the “Death by a 1000 cuts” mantra. It doesn’t take one big thing to ruin a forecast, but small changes in both a synoptic and mesoscale sense can cause shifts in setups like this. High further NE and more western trek of an SLP will cause a large u-vector anomaly of the wind field, allowing the low-level easterlies to protrude way beyond the scope of where we were thinking 24 hrs ago. I’m gonna have to adjust my totals most likely due to the current state of guidance. I do see the 81 crew still doing the best here. HREF is very interesting to say the least, so I’ll have to dig more into that. It’s a phenomenal tool to use for situations like this, for ZR events, and especially for severe. Absolutely good bookmark.

 

I’m really tired. My neighbor set off a car alarm outside and it woke me up a bit earlier than normal for the PM. I’m heading back to bed. I hope my previous discos can sustain merit with the new trends, and don’t sway people to take my posts with a grain salt. I was just reporting my thoughts based on the model trends at hand. I wish I wasn’t on mids so I could delve more into the nitty gritty.

Edit: I had to switch to the PC and post this since Tapatalk absolutely butchered this post. Sorry for the repost.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, NorthArlington101 said:

EURO went even more east. Would definitely an outlier in its 6z ensembles, but not sure that matters. 

Still get 2" from the initial thump, even in the city. Better measure it before the rain begins to really ramp up.

Euro went East or west?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, AdamHLG said:

I hate to say it but deep down I think we all know where this is headed.  We just don't want to accept it.

Just trying to stay positive for my fellow weenies closer to the coast. Although, I’m starting to feel a little uneasy about a sleet / FRZ RN fest up here as well if the bleeding doesn’t stop soon 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, A777 said:

imageproxy.php?img=&key=4c6452e0fc83486cimageproxy.php?img=&key=4c6452e0fc83486cimageproxy.php?img=&key=4c6452e0fc83486c

image.png

I am still thinking the true LP positioning is going to end up over the DE bay where the other closed isobar is. Euro does do what the GFS looked to do and wrap the cold air in with a quicker change in wind direction to get rid of the SE winds. Provided we had a decent track, this would be a good run, but re PSU's thoughts earlier, further west is never what we want to see. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, A777 said:

imageproxy.php?img=&key=4c6452e0fc83486cimageproxy.php?img=&key=4c6452e0fc83486cimageproxy.php?img=&key=4c6452e0fc83486c

image.png

LOL. Amazing how far this has slowly shifted each run for days now. I would say I'll go outside and look up and watch it go over my head, but at this rate, it will probably be over Hagerstown come tomorrow night.

I'm expecting pretty much nothing now. Really was looking forward to this one, especially since my kids weren't old enough to remember 2016 and haven't seen a big one yet. That said, I feel really awful for anyone pretty far NW when it looked like no matter what, they were safe. Hope they can still manage to turn things around and have it break right for them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, blizzardmeiser said:

Do these maps ever verify????

I was gonna share a similar sentiment...If you ask me these things need to wither be retired or redone to spit out more reasonable solutions. Not saying I believe snow depth maps much...but needless to say they create a confusing illusion for some. It's like constantly overdone maps with ridiculous totals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, osfan24 said:

LOL. Amazing how far this has slowly shifted each run for days now. I would say I'll go outside and look up and watch it go over my head, but at this rate, it will probably be over Hagerstown come tomorrow night.

I'm expecting pretty much nothing now. Really was looking forward to this one, especially since my kids weren't old enough to remember 2016 and haven't seen a big one yet. That said, I feel really awful for anyone pretty far NW when it looked like no matter what, they were safe. Hope they can still manage to turn things around and have it break right for them.

It's disappointing, but no guidance gives you and I nothing.  I'd say you still have a pretty decent chance at WSW verification.  Much less chance for me.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...