Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,763
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    samarham26
    Newest Member
    samarham26
    Joined

December 16/17 Winter Event


MN Transplant
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, BTRWx's Thanks Giving said:

Do ensemble max charts even belong here?

Only dropping it in for the fun of it! The mean is of course what we should be looking at. Though some features are maybe easier to see in something like the max, like the frederick jackpot. There's already some better snowfall there in the mean to hint at better rates there but the max really highlights that at least one of the models in the blend likes that area. For what it's worth, the 00z run ALSO pegged northern Frederick for good totals through 00z Thursday, which is why I'm keen to see how that verifies. It's visible on both the mean and max.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Death by a thousand paper cuts.  The high has trended SLIGHTLY NE of where it was days ago.  The confluence in the NE weakened some.  The 50/50 moves out slightly faster...and the storm slowed down 6-12 hours...increasing the spacing between the two and allowing for more ridging in front of it.  I was always bothered by how far west the upper level trough was going neutral and starting to lift, we needed all those other things to offset and they went the wrong way.  Some problems that I think the globals had a hard time seeing at range...that are now coming into focus (NAM saw it from jump) was the without a closed off mid and upper level circulation (ERS talked about this) there is nothing to stop the easterly flow north of the low from blasting way NW.  Add in all the warm water and that is shifting the boundary west...and the low track right with it.  I don't think there is any one thing to point to that did this...it was a lot of things that all went the wrong way...and that was partly why this was a slow bleed and not a sudden shift.  No one factor suddenly got a LOT worse...they all just degraded along the margins a little.  IMO what hurt us most was just a little too much spacing between the 50/50 combined with the trough digging in a little too far west then lifting instead of amplifying along the east coast.  The other factors like warm water and less confluence and shallow cold could have overcome that if they had all trended perfectly...but the warts in the overall synoptic setup required a lot else to go perfect...for a time it seemed like they all would.  

you're analysis is always impeccable. are you saying this is a fail?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

You have forgotten more weather than I’ll ever know but I have to say that I don’t agree with this.  It seems everyone just looks at the letters L and H but never at the isobars. At 36 the gfs has the lowest pressure over Norfolk. Same as previous run. At 42 the lowest pressures are well off shore where as at 6z they were right over Ocean City. Just my take.

This is what I saw 

A1CD91D7-EBE3-4A43-BFE1-3474C8E46DDD.gif.12aa3067b4adcadd714e1e1e6449be3a.gif

7881EF68-3A5B-45A7-9F6B-CB3B63373BF8.gif.9b63ee2b99ae4488a717ef4d1e841716.gif

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

49 minutes ago, wxtrix said:

our upper air temps never go above freezing on that run so i don't think it's west.

Surface track was west...mid level results were better due to a better close off of the mid and upper level circulations earlier.  That would lead to a tighter wound system...which is good if you have an inside track.  There was a lot to like in the 12z GFS I was just pointing out that the larger trend of the track shifting west did not halt, that was the bad.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, psuhoffman said:

Surface track was west...mid level results were better due to a better close off of the mid and upper level circulations earlier.  That would lead to a tighter wound system...which is good if you have an inside track.  There was a lot to like in the 12z GFS I was just pointing out that the larger trend of the track shifting west did not halt, that was the bad.  

I'm mobile, do you have access to the ML depictions on the Euro to see if it has the ML/UL circulations closed off and thats part of its reason on better thermals? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...