Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,763
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    samarham26
    Newest Member
    samarham26
    Joined

December 16/17 Winter Event


MN Transplant
 Share

Recommended Posts

6 minutes ago, lpaschall said:

Agreed. Temps were forecasted to be 3-4 degrees higher in Westminster at this time. Holding at 33 with STRONG sun. 

It's a frigid 40 at DCA right now at 11am.  We will blow past the forecast high of 42. Yes, there is a H up north. Just with a very unimpressive airmass here. Folks are free to live and die by each model wobble but we have seen this movie before. Sure, it will start frozen but one of those scenarios will a little white on the grass in the AM slowly disappears as you go inside the beltway to cartoppers and then inside DC itself a little slush on the windshields. Then a very quick changeover and that is that. The immediate DC metro is meh at best.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ErinInTheSky said:

WB

 

gFjceqT.png

We gotta be smart about these maps. We all know they aren’t to be taken verbatim but Baltimore city isn’t getting 8” and glen Burnie gets 3-4” when they have the same elevation. That rate of difference in snow totals will be elevation based. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Warm Nose said:

LOL that takes me from 3 to 10 inches. Not buying.

Just conveying what the model is showing, using positive snow depth change to avoid counting sleet, and it is showing an improvement for many (the most populous areas in this forum).

In reality, you never had 3" before and you don't have 10" now.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Baltimorewx said:

We gotta be smart about these maps. We all know they aren’t to be taken verbatim but Baltimore city isn’t getting 8” and glen Burnie gets 3-4” when they have the same elevation. That rate of difference in snow totals will be elevation based. 

Also, I don't see the Inner Harbor with full UHI outperforming BWI in this one being so thermals dependent. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, DDweatherman said:

Agreed, there's not a primary present but if you see what I just said to Joe and he confirmed is we want to see this thing close off in the ML's and have the winds not vector out of the SE pumping in the WAA for the entirely of the low's track to our latitude. 

I agree with you. I tend to look at the surface and neglect the upper levels. Get them to close off and I think the wrapped look returns and most of us win with a backside burst or snow

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the cold air source will be less tepid and shallow than is popularly discussed. It began to establish itself late last night and is not the stale 48 hour stuff that often messes us up, 

tight nowIm 38/20 with a 30.28. That’s near perfection and other time in the past when things appeared more optimistic I never got into an ideal range like described currently

its going to be a nowcast event.. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

From 12z we are still over 24 hours from blastoff. Don’t think that we can’t improve in that time period. It is most definitely possible. Minute changes can be huge when it concerns snowfall.

Someone needs to tell the 12z CMC that. :arrowhead:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't know if I really view the GFS as a reversal of the trend.  It shifted the low track NW.  That is the trend...all our other problems come from the fact the low keeps trending west with every run.  Within that the GFS improved on some meso features that helped us out.  An earlier close of the mid level circulation and such a more tightly wound system.  And that worked for us wrt snowfall.  But that is a meso detail within the larger scale...and on the larger scale the trend was another shift west in the low track.  It is fine to celebrate the good things about this GFS run but we shouldn't overlook the bad.  If the trend in the track were to halt NOW and adjust east slightly we are still close enough (NW of 95) to salvage things if the details like early close of the mid levels and banding and fast WAA thump go our way.  So its good to see some of that on the GFS.  But we need the larger trend with the track of the system to stop or it wont make any difference.  If this tracks up west of the bay no one in here is going to be happy no matter how the meso nowcast details shake out.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Baltimorewx said:

We gotta be smart about these maps. We all know they aren’t to be taken verbatim but Baltimore city isn’t getting 8” and glen Burnie gets 3-4” when they have the same elevation. That rate of difference in snow totals will be elevation based. 

Subtract big time in areas that show sleet and freezing rain. WB GFS 

70872624-8634-4564-9042-6360D3970F7B.png

00C5F56F-46C6-49FA-865B-91818D0CA076.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...