Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,764
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    samarham26
    Newest Member
    samarham26
    Joined

December 16/17 Winter Event


MN Transplant
 Share

Recommended Posts

GM, I see the NAM is longer calling for 50 inches along the MD/Pa line.  All joking aside, to clarify my email last night about the NAMs performance and subsequent NWS remarks which appear to indicate that my point was misconstrued after I signed off.  I am a strong advocate of fully funding the dedicated and hard working federal employees at NWS.  Especially with the weather more volatile then ever, it is critical that they have adequate resources to meet their mission to protect the public.   As a manager in the federal government at another Agency, I can state without question that adequate funding is critical to providing the best possible service to the taxpayers of this country.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Wonderdog said:

Must be favoring the EURO. I think it could break either way for us.

I guess it could.  it was only about 3 days ago we were in the pink.  I thought when it adjusts in the next couple days it will still be a nice event. The sharp cutoff at the eastern end of the county and climo should have been my warning flags.  there will be others just looking at the upcoming high latitude blocking being modeled.  better than 2019 that's for sure. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mappy said:

so few pages to read this am. either people are already exhausted from tracking, or the euro wasn't that good. 

All of the above. I'm a split between exhausted and acceptance. There comes a point where you know the game is over and you stop fouling and just let the other team run out the clock. I'll check out 12z runs, but it's becoming more clear that not only does it get warm and any front-end snow washes away, but there isn't going to be some amazing deform show on the back end, either. Early in the winter for sure, but so frustrating to see a potential big storm just pulled out from under us, especially when you would have thought there would be some adjustments back to the east.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just observing what is going on right now in my simpleton mind is reason enough to conclude this is a whole lot of nothing here.  There is no Arctic airmass. We had clear skies and dews around 20, and DCA barely sniffed freezing last night- busted on the forecast low of 29. High today supposed to be 42, probably hit 45 give or take a degree.  The point is there might be a H in Canada, but it not a "Canadian" high.  Everyone talks about CAD being under modeled and slow to retreat. Sure- when it is COLD air damning, not COOl air damning. We basically are entering the storm with a seasonal to perhaps slightly below normal airmass and a ton of air from very mild waters ready to flood in.  So sure, with low dews we may wet bulb at the start so we see flakes flying at the outset, but this will likely be a very quick changeover and a lot of wet roads. Anything on the backside will be luck. Just observations from nearly half a century in the immediate metro.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ovechkin said:

Just observing what is going on right now in my simpleton mind is reason enough to conclude this is a whole lot of nothing here.  There is no Arctic airmass. We had clear skies and dews around 20, and DCA barely sniffed freezing last night- busted on the forecast low of 29. High today supposed to be 42, probably hit 45 give or take a degree.  The point is there might be a H in Canada, but it not a "Canadian" high.  Everyone talks about CAD being under modeled and slow to retreat. Sure- when it is COLD air damning, not COOl air damning. We basically are entering the storm with a seasonal to perhaps slightly below normal airmass and a ton of air from very mild waters ready to flood in.  So sure, with low dews we may wet bulb at the start so we see flakes flying at the outset, but this will likely be a very quick changeover and a lot of wet roads. Anything on the backside will be luck. Just observations from nearly half a century in the immediate metro.

Agreed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, osfan24 said:

All of the above. I'm a split between exhausted and acceptance. There comes a point where you know the game is over and you stop fouling and just let the other team run out the clock. I'll check out 12z runs, but it's becoming more clear that not only does it get warm and any front-end snow washes away, but there isn't going to be some amazing deform show on the back end, either. Early in the winter for sure, but so frustrating to see a potential big storm just pulled out from under us, especially when you would have thought there would be some adjustments back to the east.

it could still adjust east. we are 24hrs or so from start for our far southern people. but having realistic expectations is good, its going to be warm for the usual places, and cold for the usual places. a mix in between. i know i am going to sleet. probably a lot. happens every coastal. but snow is snow so im happy with whatever i get.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ovechkin said:

Just observing what is going on right now in my simpleton mind is reason enough to conclude this is a whole lot of nothing here.  There is no Arctic airmass. We had clear skies and dews around 20, and DCA barely sniffed freezing last night- busted on the forecast low of 29. High today supposed to be 42, probably hit 45 give or take a degree.  The point is there might be a H in Canada, but it not a "Canadian" high.  Everyone talks about CAD being under modeled and slow to retreat. Sure- when it is COLD air damning, not COOl air damning. We basically are entering the storm with a seasonal to perhaps slightly below normal airmass and a ton of air from very mild waters ready to flood in.  So sure, with low dews we may wet bulb at the start so we see flakes flying at the outset, but this will likely be a very quick changeover and a lot of wet roads. Anything on the backside will be luck. Just observations from nearly half a century in the immediate metro.

I think that’s a good point and one I tried to hint at several days ago. This is not a true cad situation. But I also think this a very unusual low track as well. Eh, what do I know?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, BristowWx said:

I guess it could.  it was only about 3 days ago we were in the pink.  I thought when it adjusts in the next couple days it will still be a nice event. The sharp cutoff at the eastern end of the county and climo should have been my warning flags.  there will be others just looking at the upcoming high latitude blocking being modeled.  better than 2019 that's for sure. 

Warrenton is in warning area. 11 miles from my abode. But that could make all the difference. More elevation too.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ovechkin said:

Just observing what is going on right now in my simpleton mind is reason enough to conclude this is a whole lot of nothing here.  There is no Arctic airmass. We had clear skies and dews around 20, and DCA barely sniffed freezing last night- busted on the forecast low of 29. High today supposed to be 42, probably hit 45 give or take a degree.  The point is there might be a H in Canada, but it not a "Canadian" high.  Everyone talks about CAD being under modeled and slow to retreat. Sure- when it is COLD air damning, not COOl air damning. We basically are entering the storm with a seasonal to perhaps slightly below normal airmass and a ton of air from very mild waters ready to flood in.  So sure, with low dews we may wet bulb at the start so we see flakes flying at the outset, but this will likely be a very quick changeover and a lot of wet roads. Anything on the backside will be luck. Just observations from nearly half a century in the immediate metro.

 

Mentioned the other day the tendency for most storms to hug the coast and be coastal huggers , it has been a while we have had a true bench mark storm. 

As for CAD look at these run over run temp changes in my area, Southern NJ and Delaware in general. A function of NW Atlantic SSTs possibly and as you mentioned nothing really special in terms of CAD although the source region of the CAD is the real issue.  And of course the warmer Atlantic SSTs for the Eastern areas combined with the storm track. Maybe this shifts as we head into early January. 

 

20201215_072348.jpg

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, nj2va said:

6z Euro tracks the low over Williamsburg - Lower Ches Bay - Up the Bay to near CAPE (too bad it’s not a Cat 4 everyone here craves) - then heads NE from there.  Furthest west (on the 3 hour panels), the 850 line gets is Leesburg.  

Pretty good track for deep creek

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Siberian-Snowcover-Myth said:

Agreed.

 

6 minutes ago, ovechkin said:

Just observing what is going on right now in my simpleton mind is reason enough to conclude this is a whole lot of nothing here.  There is no Arctic airmass. We had clear skies and dews around 20, and DCA barely sniffed freezing last night- busted on the forecast low of 29. High today supposed to be 42, probably hit 45 give or take a degree.  The point is there might be a H in Canada, but it not a "Canadian" high.  Everyone talks about CAD being under modeled and slow to retreat. Sure- when it is COLD air damning, not COOl air damning. We basically are entering the storm with a seasonal to perhaps slightly below normal airmass and a ton of air from very mild waters ready to flood in.  So sure, with low dews we may wet bulb at the start so we see flakes flying at the outset, but this will likely be a very quick changeover and a lot of wet roads. Anything on the backside will be luck. Just observations from nearly half a century in the immediate metro.

Spot on!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Chris78 said:

Pretty good track for deep creek

Yeah, should be good skiing conditions on Thursday/Friday with some fresh powder, I’m excited.  Though I’d rather a solution that had the low just offshore to get more of the forum in on the action even if brought down totals here.  It feels like we’ve been tracking this for 3 weeks....

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WxWatcher007 said:

Well things looked good until we started seeing SLP and mid level tracks over the Bay. That won’t cut it in mid December unless you have a true Arctic airmass. 

Yeah. This is three storms already this month that if they happen in January are likely all snow producers. Let’s just keep the low train moving.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WxWatcher007 said:

Well things looked good until we started seeing SLP and mid level tracks over the Bay. That won’t cut it in mid December unless you have a true Arctic airmass. 

I know we give NAM a lot of crap around here (poor thing) but it was the first to latch onto the inland track.  We all laughed at it..”aw how cute look at the crazy old uncle 84H NAM doing NAM-like things...”. 

Even uncle Larry can be right once in a while.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, dallen7908 said:

Euro 6z:

 

Verbatim (without looking at the soundings), Similar or very slight worse than 00 UT, for DC it shows snow beginning between 11 AM and noon changing to mixed precipitation between 2 and 3, surface temperature of 34 degrees. 

Snow maximum still in central PA - just under 2 feet

How far west and north does the mix line make it?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...