Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,769
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    karlsnowstorm
    Newest Member
    karlsnowstorm
    Joined

December 16/17 Winter Event


MN Transplant
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

I think their being harsh but I noticed your not really predicting anything much different then most but it’s the tone. Instead of focusing on a he positives for the parts of the region that get snow you are focused more on the fail aspects. I get crap for that too sometimes. No one likes to hear depressing news. Even if they know it’s true. 

I agree. Thanks for sharing this.  I can see what you are saying for the eastern areas, though I am saying generous snow amounts just well north and west. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

With the evolution we see on the GFS, the 850's are actually somewhat cooler than 12z in spots. The 2m temps are just what is modeled so warm. That being said, the Euro and EPS are about 3-4 degrees colder for a couple of the time periods. Could the GFS be running a bit warm at the surface? Weird to see it having colder 850's than some models but torching the surface. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WxUSAF said:

Gfs has a stronger WAA onset than before with good dendritic growth. I’m right in the R/S line during the evening as depicted with an isothermal profile right at freezing below like 900mb. The snow side of that line cashes in. 

I think one of the reasons the GFS has such warm 2m temps are the rates/precip? Yes the WAA is good on the front (which is certainly what we want vs relying on the backside to score good totals). Low QPF is equating to warmer SFC temps possibly? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Gfs has a stronger WAA onset than before with good dendritic growth. I’m right in the R/S line during the evening as depicted with an isothermal profile right at freezing below like 900mb. The snow side of that line cashes in. 

It's a crazy close call for us if, ya know, that was the actual real solution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, WxUSAF said:

Gfs has a stronger WAA onset than before with good dendritic growth. I’m right in the R/S line during the evening as depicted with an isothermal profile right at freezing below like 900mb. The snow side of that line cashes in. 

Looks like we’ll be straddling that line. Guess all we can do is hope we fall on the snow side and cash in our chips. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, high risk said:

         Fair enough.     It could be wrong;  I'm just reacting to the folks who said that the NAM showing an inland low track proved that it should be immediately euthanized.

Anything that doesn’t give me warning level snow I am tossing :bike:

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, high risk said:

         Fair enough.     It could be wrong;  I'm just reacting to the folks who said that the NAM showing an inland low track proved that it should be immediately euthanized.

It’s hard to figure out when a model is just playing into its bias and when it’s on to something. NAM bias is over amplified. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, Winter Wizard said:

GFS is slightly warmer in the mid-levels otherwise there isn’t really a discernible difference from 12z.

That being said, won’t do anything to reduce the tension in this thread lol. 

To reduce the tension...folks can start looking at the medium-long range again? The posts earlier today about the AO oughta soothe some nerves :) I think it was encouraging!

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...