Ji Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Just now, clskinsfan said: Imagine being in the NY board right now. The RGEM gave them 32 and the GFS gave them 7. id take the RGEM 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 1 minute ago, PhineasC said: It was basically a hold at best. Not sure I get the excitement either. It's better because the low is but more off the coast...and it stays colder with less mixing closer to I-95, it seems Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
osfan24 Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Just now, NorthArlington101 said: It wasn’t warmer and it probably gives everyone warning-level snow? Wasn’t a step to forum-wide MECS but for those with tempered expectations I think seeing things not go sharply in the wrong direction was good. I get that, but with such huge totals being shown on many models not that far away and within striking distance, this scenario would be a bit disappointing. I guess it's all about expectations. Had this not been showing such big potential for days on end with big totals hanging around, 6-10 or whatever would sound amazing for December. But that run almost cut my recent GFS run totals in half. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowchaser Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, BTRWx's Thanks Giving said: I can't believe how many of you said this was good. Depth Ski country towards snowshoe, WV gets buried with 12”-18”. Still above 6” for most. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caviman2201 Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 4 minutes ago, BTRWx's Thanks Giving said: I can't believe how many of you said this was good. Depth Doesn't this include things like compaction and melting? I think most of us understand (I hope) that in a storm like this 10" of snowfall will in no way mean 10" on the ground at the end. Even a short period of mixing would knock down all the front end snow to dense slush. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 honestly, the best part of this run was the light snow showers that fall all day Thursday into Friday morning 6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NorthArlington101 Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 I get that, but with such huge totals being shown on many models not that far away and within striking distance, this scenario would be a bit disappointing. I guess it's all about expectations. Had this not been showing such big potential for days on end with big totals hanging around, 6-10 or whatever would sound amazing for December. But that run almost cut my recent GFS run totals in half.Matter of perspective, I think. I’ve been operating under the assumption a full rug pull to 0” is possible. That said, I still believe this could be 1.5’ for me too. Anything better than the full rug pull satisfies me and I let the crazy runs give me some free dopamine. 4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batmanbrad Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, birdsofprey02 said: Took a few Dr. Halverson classes at umbc for a geography degree maybe 15 years ago. Assuming it’s the same person? yes, this is that same Jeff: https://ges.umbc.edu/halverson/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caviman2201 Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 1 minute ago, batmanbrad said: yes, this is that same Jeff: https://ges.umbc.edu/halverson/ Pretty sure I took Physical Geography with him too in the 2003-2005 timeframe. Neat. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 @osfan24 @Ji everytime in the last few years the GFS was significantly less qpf then the other globals it eventually caved. I’m way more worried about track then meso scale features that will determine 10 v 20”. Unless we see all guidance shift that way I’m just happy to have a solution that doesn’t go towards my fail scenario. And for me only getting 10” isn’t a fail. 6 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baltosquid Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Track is better but the precipitation rates aren't there this time. Not too worried about that run. Track worried me more earlier personally, no deterioration on that for 00z, perhaps improvements. Hopefully we can get the rates back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MillvilleWx Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 17 minutes ago, Winter Wizard said: Quite a SE shift on the H7 track...this would make just about all of the forum, including those near I-95, very happy. Haven't gotten a good look at the GFS yet since I am still getting ready to head out for work. The thermal profile on the GFS is always a miss with these events and likely not cold enough in the beginning stages of the storm. I think the surface and lowest reaches of the boundary layer trends colder if the HP over Quebec continues to signal 1037-1039 strength. The height pattern out over the eastern CONUS leading in isn't something extraordinary that would mute some of the surface cold. The 7H prog here is basically the only "concern" I see if this would deflect the strongest mid-level frontgen towards NJ/DE with TROWAL potential locked over the NE portion of the sub, at best. Would like to see that low set along the coast ala the Euro to get a deformation pivot over the CMD/SoPA. Overall, it wasn't bad really. Did tick back in the extremes some, but the synoptic details are still not squared and there's room for improvement. And as always, meso hasn't even been taken into account yet. I wouldn't sweat it if anyone is "worried", except Ji cuz then he would be out of character. 7 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nj2va Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 1 minute ago, caviman2201 said: Doesn't this include things like compaction and melting? I think most of us understand (I hope) that in a storm like this 10" of snowfall will in no way mean 10" on the ground at the end. Even a short period of mixing would knock down all the front end snow to dense slush. People should take both the positive snow depth maps and the 10:1 snow maps with a grain of salt — in marginal situations, 10:1 as gospel is setting yourself up for disappointment but sometimes the positive snow depth maps are underdone especially for things you cited above or UHI issues, etc. It’d be better to look at the QPF and soundings vs a computer generated snowmap. 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 the CMC still looks like its haulin ass Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SnowCane Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Honestly plenty happy with the GFS/Euro. Earlier today many wouldn’t have been surprised if everything trended warmer/more rainy. Great to see models are holding and give most a chance of frozen, can’t be mad about that! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zdudswx Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 CMC at hr 72 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
caviman2201 Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 2 minutes ago, nj2va said: People should take both the positive snow depth maps and the 10:1 snow maps with a grain of salt — in marginal situations, 10:1 as gospel is setting yourself up for disappointment but sometimes the positive snow depth maps are underdone especially for things you cited above or UHI issues, etc. It’d be better to look at the QPF and soundings vs a computer generated snowmap. Yea but... That's harder 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
yoda Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 CCB is noice on the 00z CMC at 72... mauling everyone I95 and west 2 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AU74 Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 10 minutes ago, birdsofprey02 said: Took a few Dr. Halverson classes at umbc for a geography degree maybe 15 years ago. Assuming it’s the same person? It is. My son took a couple of his classes about 4-5 years ago and he was part of CWG at the time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaydreb Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Wow, congrats PSU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stormtracker Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 CMC is a powerful 2-4 inches here in the metro area. I guess. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Just now, Zdudswx said: CMC at hr 72 its weird. On TT---the 72 map looks like this when it shows qpf. but then Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Just now, stormtracker said: CMC is a powerful 2-4 inches here in the metro area. I guess. lol thats barely an advisory Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaydreb Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Just now, stormtracker said: CMC is a powerful 2-4 inches here in the metro area. I guess. Yeah, the 0z runs have definitely tempered my expectations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
batmanbrad Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Just now, losetoa6 said: Many ensembles have it in that general area. But tomorrow night mesos should start to hone in on banding an subsequent lollies thanks - I deleted my post after I saw I was beaten to it (ninja'd?) by jaydreb, LOL... also saw that 20 of that 29" spot occurs in 6 hours between 66 and 72, LOL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
high risk Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 FWIW, and I am not saying that it's right, the CMC evolution/track is more similar to the 00z NAM than to the 00z GFS.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MillvilleWx Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 That mega band in SoPA is the TROWAL I've been mentioning. Absolute classic and can confirm when I look at the 7H Theta-E's 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baltosquid Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 CMC is strange, very strong but one of the most pronounced snow-rain cutoffs yet. It really wants to tuck the storm into Ocean City/Delaware. I'm skeptical of that. Very different track to the GFS. Give me the GFS track and CMC rates, please! 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MillvilleWx Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 3 minutes ago, high risk said: FWIW, and I am not saying that it's right, the CMC evolution/track is more similar to the 00z NAM than to the 00z GFS.... It's def closer in the SLP track, but still not as amped. Agreed. GFS was a bit flat comparing. Probably just GFS being GFS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jaydreb Posted December 14, 2020 Share Posted December 14, 2020 Lol, GFS gives Boston 2” and CMC gives them 12”. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts