Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,607
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

December 16/17 Winter Event


MN Transplant
 Share

Recommended Posts

@high risk

The NAM does sometimes sniff stuff out.  It nailed the sleet fest coming from range in March 2017 when all the globals had snow.  But the problem is, its wildly inconsistent at range...which is to be expected for a model designed to handle convection and meso scale banding.  It is useful in showing thermals better and a better detailed representation of what the storm might look like...but wrt synoptic level general things like track, at range it's hard to take any one run seriously because you don't know what it is onto something or when it is just on something.  

@BTRWx's Thanks Giving

You NEED to stop with those crap snow depth maps.  I have no idea how they are calculated but over the years they have been just as garbage as the weenie weatherbell ones.  They end up seeming right for the same reason some of the trolls here do...because we fails so often.  The models are often wrong and thigns shift worse.  And when that happens...it makes a map like those look good.  But whenever a storm actually does what the guidance says...those bust low.  WAY LOW.  I will give you one example just because I looked at the soundings.  The NAM one you posted shows Westminster with 3" of positive snow depth.  But they get about an inch of QPF with all levels at or below freezing.  They get another .8 of QPF that is obviously sleet from the sounding.  The surface is below freezing the whole time.  Heck even if the whole storm was sleet that would be more than 3"!!!  That is just crazy stupid.  Now maybe the storm shifts even further NW and then 3" in Westminster isn't a bad idea.  If the track actually penetrates inside the mouth of the Potomac...that would be trouble for up here...but a track like that NAM had over the southern Bay in up the eastern Delmarva supports a big snow (with some mixing yes) up here...and the model shows that if you look at the actual soundings and hour by hour plots...then that depth map shows something completely different.  THis is not the only time but its a current example of how that map is just WRONG.  

 

  • Like 7
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LP08 said:

Adding the surface which looks above freezing in and around dc for the duration.

 

 

Without seeing a sounding, I can't be sure, but that seems a lot like the 18z GFS for the R/S line area.  Nearly isothermal profile right around freezing from ~850mb to the surface.  Very tiny margin between hours of heavy wet snow and driving rain.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WxUSAF said:

Without seeing a sounding, I can't be sure, but that seems a lot like the 18z GFS for the R/S line area.  Nearly isothermal profile right around freezing from ~850mb to the surface.  Very tiny margin between hours of heavy wet snow and driving rain.  

My goal in mby is to hopefully avoid a driving rainstorm after a few hours of snow.  Hopefully during lulls we can hold on to 33-35 and stay “frozen” for most of the storm.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

If the low does go due north up the Bay that is too close for comfort.  20- 30 miles east would make a big difference.  May be an hour by hour outcast Late Wed. Afternoon/evening.  We are only 48 hours out, but we are still 48 hours out....another 30 miles west track no one will be happy east of the Blue Ridge or in Northern MD.  

2020 has proven anything is possible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, LP08 said:

My goal in mby is to hopefully avoid a driving rainstorm after a few hours of snow.  Hopefully during lulls we can hold on to 33-35 and stay “frozen” for most of the storm.  

Yeah, I was thinking sleet, but 18z GFS and Euro seem more like snow vs. rain.  

These are really tiny thermal details.  I'm pretty much just in "chips fall" time.  Seems like we know the basic deal here. 

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doesn't the progression of the low look a little odd? At hr54 its at the CBBT, hr55 its 10mi offshore, hr56 its off the southern tip of Chincoteague (all fine so far) but then at hr57 it jumps 25mi NW over Deale, MD, moves due N over Cambridge and then moves NE from there.  Hr53-54 on 18z was significantly SE of Hr59-60 on the 12z before that random jump NW where it 'corrected' to match 12z's SLP track.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, clskinsfan said:

It almost looks like it pivots as it starts to pull away. These qpf numbers out of the Euro are right up there with all of our biggest storms. About 36 hours from onset ya'll.

Man we really flirt with sleet all the way out to I 81.

But if the Euro is right and we end up with over 2 inches of qpf in the form of snow it will be historic along the I - 81 corridor.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, caviman2201 said:

Doesn't the progression of the low look a little odd? At hr54 its at the CBBT, hr55 its 10mi offshore, hr56 its off the southern tip of Chincoteague (all fine so far) but then at hr57 it jumps 25mi NW over Deale, MD, moves due N over Cambridge and then moves NE from there.  Hr53-54 on 18z was significantly SE of Hr59-60 on the 12z before that random jump NW where it 'corrected' to match 12z's SLP track.

I thought it was odd as well. There's also the double barrel structure going on as well, though it seems the low closest to the coast is the dominant player.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Jmister said:

Hoping so! I keep following this sub-forum closest because if the models are good for you guys, it's good news for me in the PHL area haha.

Lots of good entertainment here too.

Can’t you hook @WxUSAF up with some better model data? NASA or wherever he works doesn’t have the good stuff apparently. LOL

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, osfan24 said:

I thought it was odd as well. There's also the double barrel structure going on as well, though it seems the low closest to the coast is the dominant player.

If it had continued NE from Hr53-56, it would have been a significant move SE from 12z... maybe thats what the SLP will actually do, but maybe its something someone smarter than me can explain because 12z didn't do that.  It was tucked the whole way up the coast and move more or less due NE.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Chris78 said:

Man we really flirt with sleet all the way out to I 81.

But if the Euro is right and we end up with over 2 inches of qpf in the form of snow it will be historic along the I - 81 corridor.

But that is the game you have to play for the heaviest precip. Ride the sleet/Snow line and stay all snow and you are getting hammered. 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...