Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,617
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    RyRyB
    Newest Member
    RyRyB
    Joined

Active mid December with multiple event potential


Typhoon Tip
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

About time that thing got a clue. Noted that GFSv16 has been in line this whole time and has been more or less on track with the EC.

Yeah, but it always takes a while no matter what for them to really hone in on something. When you look at the 12z runs, they are in really good agreement.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Whineminster said:

ok the time has come @HoarfrostHubb - what's your call bro?  

I just put out an email to my school... that's always fun.   I'm going with 6-9" for the Montachusett area... I'm thinking we sniff some subsidance for at least a bit.  Hopefully that is modelled wrong and we break a foot... 

And you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, HoarfrostHubb said:

I just put out an email to my school... that's always fun.   I'm going with 6-9" for the Montachusett area... I'm thinking we sniff some subsidance for at least a bit.  Hopefully that is modelled wrong and we break a foot... 

And you?

close - I'm 5" to 8".  If we ticky ticky north tonight, then 8-12". 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Whineminster said:

close - I'm 5" to 8".  If we ticky ticky north tonight, then 8-12". 

I hope we ticky tick south to get into the better H7 fronto banding. We're not getting into the WCB. As things stand I'm going 4-8'' here. Hope to squeak out a warning event but I can see a scenario where we just subsidence struggle our way to 4-5'' of dense sand.

  • Sad 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, DomNH said:

I hope we ticky tick south to get into the better H7 fronto banding. We're not getting into the WCB. As things stand I'm going 4-8'' here. Hope to squeak out a warning event but I can see a scenario where we just subsidence struggle our way to 4-5'' of dense sand.

I am thinking 3-5" here, just don't feel this one up here, this is a southern storm.  Hopefully I am wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

I've had Mar 2017 on my mind all morning, i went back and looked at everything i saved from it, model runs etc. The crazy thing is my first call forecast and my first call for this...

12_16.20_snow_forecast.thumb.jpg.78c4d9a427fc5a6506cb38e36af73b00.jpg03_12.17_snow_forecast.thumb.jpg.8e294d310fdf7dfcd6b06f791ae05766.jpg

I really don't think we're looking at that kind of an outcome though. That thing was really tucked into the coast and had a more typical SW to NE trajectory, where this one comes north and scoots out E/ENE. Also thermals aren't even close to where they were with that storm atm. Things can trend that way but thats not where were at. 

I'd say about 12 hours before that storm i knew we were in bring trouble as ever model had mixing well into CT as 850s and 925s blew right up the coast. 

Here's the analysis and model runs from that event. 

17311593_10100344452387032_1650465078_o.thumb.jpg.10713a73c5c2ece1644547644a52c38d.jpg

I looked it up at least it did snow in all of CT and only extreme SE got screwed. It looks like it was 7-9 inches for JC-CT, me and Tolland. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18z NAM might be the first NAM run in a while to not be more amped than the one before it....looks a shade shallower with the shortwave and downstream ridging through 15h. The confluence might be a hair weaker though so we'll see if it makes up ground.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...