Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Major Nor'easter snow storm (possible top 20) Noon Wednesday-Noon Thursday Dec 16-17, 2020


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

28 minutes ago, JoshSnow said:

Upstate people always stealing my snow not fair :cliff:

Coastal people thinking they are set up for half their yearly normal in Dec when the water is warm and the storm is sitting just off LBI because a GFS clown map says so.... 

  • Confused 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, friedmators said:

99/100 with the LP over SNJ I would think the ML would get flooded with warmth basically everywhere. The high is strong but is it that strong?

It’s the mid level low tracks that matter. If those go west of you, almost definite that you will mix and/or dryslot. Surface highs don’t stop that from happening. The high matters for the surface cold. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, nycwinter said:

will upper manhattan do better then brooklyn in regards to amounts?

100% thats almost always the case. upper manhattan could see 8-10” while brooklyn sees 5-8” depends where in brooklyn, obviously the closer you are to the coast the less amount could/would verify.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Snowlover11 said:

100% thats almost always the case. upper manhattan could see 8-10” while brooklyn sees 5-8” depends where in brooklyn, obviously the closer you are to the coast the less amount could/would verify.

I think honestly north Bronx could get 12 and JFK 5 in this setup. Really depends how far the dry slot and sleet line get. 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, HeadInTheClouds said:

Meso's like RGEM and Nam cannot be disregarded at this point but I too would like to see an ever so slight eastward shift. 

Both are technically a bit beyond their range.   They won't be grossly wrong but they might have overcorrected 30 miles or so which would result in a massive change for some areas.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, HeadInTheClouds said:

NWS Albany was talking 14:1 I think by us. I think this map includes ratios. 

BGM still talking between 12 and 14:1 as well. Pretty good I'd say. Helps limit power issues to a nonzero but quite limited factor and will be so much easier to clear. More concerned with areas closer to NYC and on coasts that do snow, paste bomb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...