Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,601
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Major Nor'easter snow storm (possible top 20) Noon Wednesday-Noon Thursday Dec 16-17, 2020


wdrag
 Share

Recommended Posts

This is our first significant area-wide threat in a couple years.  The tracking is the best part.  Let's continue to keep it fun.  I'm glad there's been barely any bickering.  Keep it up guys.  

 

You all deserve this storm.  Let's hope it doesnt break any weenie hearts.

  • Like 9
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, CIK62 said:

Snow totals summary: Mon.  +  Wed./Thurs.    EURO   2.5" + 14.0",   CMC   0 0" + 17.0",    GFS  0.5" + 13.0".       Non gust winds still 18-25mph.

Cautions......Two fast movers, borderline S/R for City, but 2"+ to work with.     

Euro is running between 15-35 for a week.   GFS still goes to the 60's on Christmas.     With snow still on the ground?!    Come on man. >>>>>>>   The 06Z just lost 30 degrees on the Highs for 25th,26th. !!!

Amended:        Cobb Method   GFS 0Z is all Snow for NYC............. 21" in 19 hours!

Nah, look again, the second is not a fast mover. It’s an 18 hour snowstorm in NYC. Take a look up north, 50/50 and NAO ridging block won’t allow it to zip. Pay attention to that. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As of now I'm not too worried about mixing/rain until you get way out east on LI and from Toms River on south.  The high to the north is legit.  Fresh cold air is always a great thing to see modeled.  Obviously, if the storm ends up super amped, these thoughts will change and coastal areas would see precip type issues.  

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SnowGoose69 said:

I think he’s just saying the system would track more tucked with a weaker PNA.  The ICON verbatim would probably still be 5-10 inches of snow for anyone north of Sandy Hook and west of Islip before they changeover over but the ICON of course doesn’t resolve the cold air correctly and has like 1 hour of snow.  This event barring some sort of massive change in several parameters even if it flips to liquid will probably be in the category of a January 87 March 93 February 2014 in regards to how much snow you see before a flip 

also like Feb 1994 where we flipped to light rain after 11 or so inches of snow.  There was also a December storm where we got 9 inches of snow and then flipped to rain sometime during the mid 80s and another one in the early 90s. Feb 1995 also comes to mind.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, Ericjcrash said:

Yeah, its going to be pretty windy and that's always underplayed when people assume ratios.

Measuring difficulties with powder blowing (multiple in the open area to get representative new depth every 6 hours), and in the wet plastered areas... might be a little easier.  Tipping buckets might get junked up with wet snow NJ/LI??? .  I won't detail now since uncertainty, but sometimes NWS heated comms antennae dishes get snow covered with heavy WET snowfall rates and we'd have to go out and broom sweep the snow off so comms wouldn't be impacted.  

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, wdrag said:

Measuring difficulties with powder blowing (multiple in the open area to get representative new depth every 6 hours), and in the wet plastered areas... might be a little easier.  Tipping buckets might get junked up with wet snow NJ/LI??? .  I won't detail now since uncertainty, but sometimes NWS heated comms antennae dishes get snow covered with heavy WET snowfall rates and we'd have to go out and broom sweep the snow off so comms wouldn't be impacted.  

I'm under the impression that strong winds basically break up dendrites, could be wrong but that makes sense to my uneducated self.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Stormlover74 said:

I'm liking this event but I'd feel more comfortable being 25-50 miles northwest as this still has time to come further west and mix or change in the city and 95 corridor and especially the coast. 

Feeling a bit nervous being 100 miles inland in Sullivan, still like what I'm seeing but undoubtedly need to wait for the wave to be properly sampled 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not sure of the impact... but the 06z EPS members for 12z/17 .. not quite as intense a storm but many members in the NYC bight.  We may know more in 24 hours. May mean slightly less qpf near the storm center, and also more option of ice/rain up to I80??  I don't know. 

 

Screen Shot 2020-12-12 at 9.44.28 AM.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, wdrag said:

Not sure of the impact... but the 06z EPS members for 12z/17 .. not quite as intense a storm but many members in the NYC bight.  We may know more in 24 hours. May mean slightly less qpf near the storm center, and also more option of ice/rain up to I80??  I don't know. 

 

Screen Shot 2020-12-12 at 9.44.28 AM.png

Wow. Those members came way west. Mixing issues 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, wdrag said:

Not sure of the impact... but the 06z EPS members for 12z/17 .. not quite as intense a storm but many members in the NYC bight.  We may know more in 24 hours. May mean slightly less qpf near the storm center, and also more option of ice/rain up to I80??  I don't know. 

 

Screen Shot 2020-12-12 at 9.44.28 AM.png

 

Those super tucked solutions would be crush jobs for @Juliancolton and crew while I cry snow weenie tears and @forkyfork laughs.

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, wdrag said:

Not sure of the impact... but the 06z EPS members for 12z/17 .. not quite as intense a storm but many members in the NYC bight.  We may know more in 24 hours. May mean slightly less qpf near the storm center, and also more option of ice/rain up to I80??  I don't know. 

 

Screen Shot 2020-12-12 at 9.44.28 AM.png

Hey Walt did those come more NW? If the NW trend started already not a good sign. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, EastonSN+ said:

Hey Walt did those come more NW? If the NW trend started already not a good sign. 

I wouldn't call it a trend until a few more cycles show the same thing.  The mean is in a nice spot currently for a big event for the entire subforum. 

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, JoshSnow said:

I would rather be in New York City than in Monticello for this event. This is a true classic coastal bomb with plenty of cold air. Boxing Day blizzard wanna be

Maybe. But here inland we will likely be in the better spot....but we need to wait for the wave to get properly sampled before either camp can say for sure what will happen.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wdrag said:

Not sure of the impact... but the 06z EPS members for 12z/17 .. not quite as intense a storm but many members in the NYC bight.  We may know more in 24 hours. May mean slightly less qpf near the storm center, and also more option of ice/rain up to I80??  I don't know. 

 

Screen Shot 2020-12-12 at 9.44.28 AM.png

Closer look. IMO i80 would have no issues with any of those tracks 

5889738A-FB43-48F9-8F27-E9B0FA964CB1.png

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...