Jump to content

  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Major Nor'easter snow storm (possible top 20) Noon Wednesday-Noon Thursday Dec 16-17, 2020

wdrag

By wdrag,
in New York City Metro

 Share

Recommended Posts

Stormlover74

Stormlover74

Posted
Posted

Upton all in with 90% chance of snow. They do mention the high could be modeled too strong though it actually got stronger this run 

so as this system approaches, expect snow to develop Wed afternoon, and then become moderate to heavy at times Wed night as the low wraps up just off the Mid Atlantic coast. Forecast mentions almost all snow at this point with a good chance of significant accumulation, with the caveat that the high to the NE may be modeled too strong, and if the high does retreat more quickly that could allow for a more N/W low track as well as potential for mixed precip for the NYC metro area and Long Island as marine air and possible warmer air aloft get involved.
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • Replies 3.8k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Rjay
Rjay
RCNYILWX
RCNYILWX

Lurker on this thread, originally from College Point Queens, been working at NWS Chicago since 2010. Jealous of this storm, as it's been exceptionally boring out here and big snowstorms like Superstor

jbenedet
jbenedet

I think you’re going to see a correction back southeast today as the arctic airmass that’s building into the region throughout the day begins to get ingested into the models.  The temp drops thro

Posted Images

NEG NAO

NEG NAO

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, rossi said:

So that’s it no more tracking it’s over - based on a 18z gfs run- what’s wrong with you?

Rossi - we are talking about possibilities - my point being you have to keep all options on the table - did I say its over ? whats wrong with you ??and tell me you would stay all snow with a tucked in solution and water temps in the upper 40"s

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Wannabehippie

Wannabehippie

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, SnowGoose69 said:

NYC would probably stay all snow if that track verified to a T.  The GFS won't see the CAD or ageo impact in that event.  Probably would hold winds 040-050 in that setup and never flip

You probably would have to get to Mid nassau, especially along the south shore, to get a flip to sleet/freezing rain and rain on the current run right? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
KeithB

KeithB

Posted
Posted

I remember about 5 years ago, we had discussions about trends. A couple of the guys did a little back test work, etc.... 

I think the conclusion was that there really are no trends in terms of being able to predict the future model runs. It's no different then looking at a roulette wheel the last xxx amount of results, or a baccarat results tabulation. Trends are just looking at the past on independent trials, and just because 3 straight model outputs have been closer to the coast in subsequent runs, that probably (and this can be proven through the historical data, but someone would have to do the work, and it would be a lot of work) there is no such thing as a "trend" in the sense that one particular direction on future runs is more or less likely. 

  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Stormlover74

Stormlover74

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, KeithB said:

I remember about 5 years ago, we had discussions about trends. A couple of the guys did a little back test work, etc.... 

I think the conclusion was that there really are no trends in terms of being able to predict the future model runs. It's no different then looking at a roulette wheel the last xxx amount of results, or a baccarat results tabulation. Trends are just looking at the past on independent trials, and just because 3 straight model outputs have been closer to the coast in subsequent runs, that probably (and this can be proven through the historical data, but someone would have to do the work, and it would be a lot of work) there is no such thing as a "trend" in the sense that one particular direction on future runs is more or less likely. 

  

Its interesting that the high didn't move or weaken. Maybe the confluence was weaker this run?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bluewave

bluewave

Posted
Posted
7 minutes ago, KeithB said:

I remember about 5 years ago, we had discussions about trends. A couple of the guys did a little back test work, etc.... 

I think the conclusion was that there really are no trends in terms of being able to predict the future model runs. It's no different then looking at a roulette wheel the last xxx amount of results, or a baccarat results tabulation. Trends are just looking at the past on independent trials, and just because 3 straight model outputs have been closer to the coast in subsequent runs, that probably (and this can be proven through the historical data, but someone would have to do the work, and it would be a lot of work) there is no such thing as a "trend" in the sense that one particular direction on future runs is more or less likely. 

  

It’s probably more accurate to use the term model biases. Seasonal storm track biases have been well documented. But we would need to use machine learning for real time model bias correction to the forecast maps.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...