Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,788
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    Cabby
    Newest Member
    Cabby
    Joined

December 5-6, 2020 Storm Observations and Nowcast


Baroclinic Zone
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, OceanStWx said:

Most likely answer is that when the changeover occurred the thermodynamic profile didn't look like what we've described. The DGZ was likely lower in the atmosphere, and over time the WCB forced it to rise. Those mid level temps were way colder at 12z (despite surface temps being near 40) than they were at 00z (despite surface temps being near 33).  

Yeah and over time the DGZ dried out after it flipped, at least that’s what I noticed when I was looking at BOS. Radar started to shred a little. I think it was thumping good in those areas in metro west shortly after changeover and then went to crap after the DGZ rose and dried out a bit.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

ezgif.com_gif_maker_(3).gif?width=1920&h

Check out the GYX evolution. Whole sounding (including the DGZ) moves up and to the right, indicative of WAA (which you can see in one of the middle columns "inferred temp advection"). Right after the flip to snow you probably only had a 1-1.5km deep near freezing layer vs 3km later.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Yeah and over time the DGZ dried out after it flipped, at least that’s what I noticed when I was looking at BOS. Radar started to shred a little. I think it was thumping good in those areas in metro west shortly after changeover and then went to crap after the DGZ rose and dried out a bit.

Yeah you’re left with like these -5C needles falling into that deep 32-33F layer. Not a good combo for efficient accumulation is an understatement. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

After seeing nearby cocorahs reports I can't be too critical of snow total verification.  Chesterville, 7-8 miles to my SW, reported 2.9" from over 2" total precip, not quite half my 6.0 and with considerably more precip.  12 miles to my WSW, the Temple observer at 1220' had 11.5".  3 stations, all within less than a 30 minute drive from each other, and a 1-2-4 ratio of snowfall.  :o

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I see it now, thanks all, it really was that simple.

The changeover had transiently good lift through the DGZ, I guess enough to cool soundings to keep it snow thereafter. But lift dropped and stayed low while we were supposed to be rocking in a comma head.

These are from 12z 3k NAM, before (21z), ~during (00z, I know in reality changeover was around 21z), and after (02z):

3k_NAM_soundings_Changeover_vertical.thumb.jpg.893fbb8a01fee332c2da380feccd6f81.jpg

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi.  My wrap addition.    Added snow reports that were accepted by the NWS and the lightning archive. 

While one can argue on the use of models and models vs pattern recognition, one difficulty continues over the years... use of 10 to 1 snow ratios. We need to be careful about this. NWS has a blended snow ratio tool (every 6 hours or less which can be interpolated). Overall model intent was good (except the one day of  a very westward set of solutions) but model snowfall was way overdone on amounts Southern NH southward that performed  the phase change reasonably well (NAM/EC).  The over-forecast was probably due to the occurrence of wet snow during 33-34F air temp, non frozen ground and much of it during daylight hours. My guess (there may be some verification out there?) was a 6 to 1 snow water ratio (if someone can provide some documentation on ratio-that would be helpful)?  This especially since many folks were speaking or imaging large flakes (DGZ ideal or less than ideal).

Snow accumulation may have as much or nearly as much to do with ratios as DGZ.   I always start with total positive snowfall change, then check the usually heavier Ferrier, and then IF frozen ground and lower thicknesses below 5380 DM - I will look to as much as 10 to 1 or Kuchera.  These are painfully earned considerations over my life.  

I may be wrong on Kuchera... but my guess is Kuchera does not take into account 33F melting that was modeled in the EC 2m temps?  Maybe it does... Sometimes Kuchera works excellent, but my experience is that it is best when clearly the sounding does not allow any melting or wet snowflakes (colder scenarios). 

Hopefully this makes sense.  I'm open to better science- if you have it, please add it (I do not have BUFKIT). 

 

My second thoughts and CT did add something recently on this...  This elevation snowstorm (event?) while not the biggest ever (never was supposed to be), not only placed ORH a foot temporarily ahead of normal, the daily record setting 9.6" was also about 14-15% of the climate 1981-2010 normal.   Since the general thinking here our forum and elsewhere, is a La Nina winter and below normal snowfall... it may be that ORH received 20% of it's seasonal total (normal is 64.1")????? I don't know.  

Whether we may have paid too much attention to yesterdays storm,  it was probably an important one for this winter at ORH.  I fervently hope that I'm wrong and we don't look back at this early Dec snowstorm, as the biggie (like last cold seasons Dec 1-2 event).  

arghhhh 

Screen_Shot_2020-12-06_at_12_49.38_PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-12-06 at 12.57.45 PM.png

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, wdrag said:

Hi.  My wrap addition.    Added snow reports that were accepted by the NWS and the lightning archive. 

While one can argue on the use of models and models vs pattern recognition, one difficulty continues over the years... use of 10 to 1 snow ratios. We need to be careful about this. NWS has a blended snow ratio tool (every 6 hours or less which can be interpolated). Overall model intent was good (except the one day of  a very westward set of solutions) but model snowfall was way overdone on amounts Southern NH southward that performed  the phase change reasonably well (NAM/EC).  The over-forecast was probably due to the occurrence of wet snow during 33-34F air temp, non frozen ground and much of it during daylight hours. My guess (there may be some verification out there?) was a 6 to 1 snow water ratio (if someone can provide some documentation on ratio-that would be helpful)?  This especially since many folks were speaking or imaging large flakes (DGZ ideal or less than ideal).

Snow accumulation may have as much or nearly as much to do with ratios as DGZ.   I always start with total positive snowfall change, then check the usually heavier Ferrier, and then IF frozen ground and lower thicknesses below 5380 DM - I will look to as much as 10 to 1 or Kuchera.  These are painfully earned considerations over my life.  

I may be wrong on Kuchera... but my guess is Kuchera does not take into account 33F melting that was modeled in the EC 2m temps?  Maybe it does... Sometimes Kuchera works excellent, but my experience is that it is best when clearly the sounding does not allow any melting or wet snowflakes (colder scenarios). 

Hopefully this makes sense.  I'm open to better science- if you have it, please add it (I do not have BUFKIT). 

 

My second thoughts and CT did add something recently on this...  This elevation snowstorm (event?) while not the biggest ever (never was supposed to be), not only placed ORH a foot temporarily ahead of normal, the daily record setting 9.6" was also about 14-15% of the climate 1981-2010 normal.   Since the general thinking here our forum and elsewhere, is a La Nina winter and below normal snowfall... it may be that ORH received 20% of it's seasonal total (normal is 64.1")????? I don't know.  

Whether we may have paid too much attention to yesterdays storm,  it was probably an important one for this winter at ORH.  I fervently hope that I'm wrong and we don't look back at this early Dec snowstorm, as the biggie (like last cold seasons Dec 1-2 event).  

arghhhh 

Screen_Shot_2020-12-06_at_12_49.38_PM.png

Screen Shot 2020-12-06 at 12.57.45 PM.png

Around NE CT here it was 3.75:1 ratio

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At ASH , we got 1 inch QPF After 2pm and it led to maybe an inch of snow for a 1:1 ratio as it was 98% snow lol

 

At Miller state park they had well over a foot at  1600’  (got a settled depth of just over 13”) around that elevation . Much above that was impossible  to measure as less trees and serious blowing and drifting on exposed NW spots

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Under performed here. 2" measured this morning. Snow was nice to look at last night and very wintery feel today with some blowing snow. Went for a walk around the neighborhood and noticed the crackling sound in the trees when the wind blew enough to fracture the ice clinging to the branches. My old place in Nottingham must have done fairly well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I know nobody cares but in the name of accuracy my measurements were actually at about 200 feet higher elevation than I thought , going back and cross referencing topo maps and measurements taken at a couple notable spots (where trail bent 180 and Just shy of A pleatau with open view of Monadanock) . My ski tracks altitude wasn’t reading and I shouldn’t have listed the elevation before checking .

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, dendrite said:

Hooksett damage

F8605957-965D-445C-91FB-8C30FE932633.jpeg

Northfield damage

BA3AA597-0F13-463C-A633-28CFBBEFFD35.jpeg
529B897B-BA2D-4CC0-B0B4-3929CE7A1CB8.jpeg

 

Other than the cable line, nbd here. I saved the bamboo and birches with frequent shaking. The birches will hopefully recover. As for my parents, at least they’ll get more sun. 

We ended up with nothing here across the lake is white recorded a 39.5 mph gust sustained 25.4mph winds at 10pm to 12am last night.  

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Lava Rock said:

As soon as I put genny away, power went back off. Classic

We just got ours back after about 14 out. Changed the oil and got the genny all put away and just hoping we don’t lose it again.  My connection is outside at the opposite end of the house, so dragging that beast out of the garage last night at 1:00am through the frozen cement and dropping limbs is not the kind of fun I’m looking to repeat. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, jbenedet said:

Still getting stink bugs and leaf footed bugs in my place. 

Lawn is green. 

A few herb plants I never harvested in the garden are still alive..

Met Winter still a ways off....

 

Lawns have the look of  mid to late April. As of friday there were a few dandelions in the yard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...