Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,770
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    WakeSnowHole
    Newest Member
    WakeSnowHole
    Joined

December Medium/Long Range Discussion


yoda
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, psuhoffman said:

Ji isn’t totally wrong. The analogs to that look aren’t that bad. Lots of snow outcomes. That kind of blocking historically would overcome a bad pac most of the time. He might be on to a sobering reality that in a warmer regime now it no longer can. I’m not jumping there yet. One run. Last run snowed on us. I’ll see how this plays out. But there are a lot of runs that torch us right through a crazy block period. If that ends up reality I would be a little disheartened...not just by the short term disappointment but the long term implications. to be clear i don’t mean if we just get unlucky and a phase happens too late or a storm gets suppressed. But if we get a -3stdv AO and a west based block and everything cuts...I don’t care what the pac looks like history suggests that line of look can overcome the pac. If we need both the pac and atl to be perfect to get snow...well we won’t see it very often!  

Its one op run. I am just looking at it at face value. Not making any broader conclusions. I evaluate at h5, not the surface, and I can tell ya I saw where this run was heading pretty quickly.

1609308000-ei5ihGzDkCE.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Its one op run. I am just looking at it at face value. Not making any broader conclusions. I evaluate at h5, not the surface, and I can tell ya I saw where this run was heading pretty quickly.

1609308000-ei5ihGzDkCE.png

The pac isn’t a dumpster fire that wave is just too amplified too early. The look day 10 is good. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, Ji said:

if we cant get winter storms in our best patterns....we are cooked bro. Wait till the blocking falls apart and its in the mid 90s in late January

You need to move somewhere else. You know the climo of this area and yet you still go berserk every year that isn't a 2009 - 2010.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CAPE said:

No, its workable on the means. But we know it will be uncooperative at times. And again, my posts were wrt  this particular op run. 

Yea something it’s trended towards today...there are 2 systems in close proximity crashing into the west next week. Earlier runs had a bit more space and the initial wave ejected. The 2nd dug in the SW and was eventually a threat around Jan 3-5. This run (and EPS supports) there isn’t much space and the lead wave washes out and most of the energy gets absorbed into the second which amplified the trough way too much to our west. EPS has a good look around day 11-13 fWIW 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Yea something it’s trended towards today...there are 2 systems in close proximity crashing into the west next week. Earlier runs had a bit more space and the initial wave ejected. The 2nd dug in the SW and was eventually a threat around Jan 3-5. This run (and EPS supports) there isn’t much space and the lead wave washes out and most of the energy gets absorbed into the second which amplified the trough way too much to our west. EPS has a good look around day 11-13 fWIW 

I saw that but why can’t we seem to get low heights in the 50/50 area?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, psuhoffman said:

Yea something it’s trended towards today...there are 2 systems in close proximity crashing into the west next week. Earlier runs had a bit more space and the initial wave ejected. The 2nd dug in the SW and was eventually a threat around Jan 3-5. This run (and EPS supports) there isn’t much space and the lead wave washes out and most of the energy gets absorbed into the second which amplified the trough way too much to our west. EPS has a good look around day 11-13 fWIW 

Troughs dumping too far west and shortwaves amplifying too soon/west is a tendency during Ninas correct?  I think this is what we are going to be battling as we try to time up a storm with a favorable NA. Hopefully we can get a bit of a PNA ridge at just the right time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, jaydreb said:

I saw that but why can’t we seem to get low heights in the 50/50 area?  

Look where the NA ridge is located. Cant have a high and a low in the same place. Ideally we want the +heights focused further NW. There are hints of that towards the end of the ens runs.

gfs-ens_z500aMean_atl_6.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, Ralph Wiggum said:

You know once the Nina fades and the PAC lag starts to become workable we are going to lose the -NAM right? 

Unlikely.  You would need the Niña to remain strong in all likelihood to lose the Atlantic.   There are very few if any cases since 1950 where December had a solid AO/NAO that were negative where there wasn’t another long duration negative stretch in January or February without some sort of decent La Niña influence.  

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, psuhoffman said:

Hard to tell it all gets mixed with timing issues between the waves. Track for the period after looks good but it’s all rainy solutions on the eps. Disappointing 

i hope this isnt the kind of winter where JB wins at 500MB but loses at the surface like he likes to claim on failed winters

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...