Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,789
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    manaja
    Newest Member
    manaja
    Joined

December Medium/Long Range Discussion


yoda
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, CAPE said:

Those surface maps are not accurate, for the umteenth time.

The 6z GFS is a classic NW of fall line snowstorm, with some mixing on the SE edge. For DC to BWI points east, the surface gets toasty for a good part of Wed, and 925 mb temps are also problematic. 850s actually look ok this run. I-95 and east will need some serious dynamical cooling during the day Wed to overcome the warming lower levels, and then hope the backside delivers at night as the low pulls away from the coast.

disagree on the i95 corridor... 06z GFS was just right lol.  It kept the area along and west in the snow the entire (well most) of the time.  06z GEFS support that.

  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, NorthArlington101 said:

Morning everyone. Headed back to sleep but my dog woke me up. Glad to see the 06z GFS held down the fort.

Happy to say the 06x GEFS was a complete repudiation of the 00z EPS. On my phone and the maps always get shrunk on my phone so I won’t bother posting, but every single member has the LP offshore OBX and lows never really get all that near the Chesapeake Bay.

GM...WB 6Z GEFS.

7742BBA6-770D-4B54-AB62-F789E44A8D9B.png

  • Like 4
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, yoda said:

disagree on the i95 corridor... 06z GFS was just right lol.  It kept the area along and west in the snow the entire (well most) of the time.  06z GEFS support that.

Disagree all you want, but verbatim surface temps are mid to upper 30s along/east of I-95 for several hours. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Ji said:
5 minutes ago, yoda said:
disagree on the i95 corridor... 06z GFS was just right lol.  It kept the area along and west in the snow the entire (well most) of the time.  06z GEFS support that.

6z gfs sucked for dc. Way to close for comfort even into loudoun

huh?  You get 20" on the 06z GFS... stop playin

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Ji said:
6 minutes ago, yoda said:
disagree on the i95 corridor... 06z GFS was just right lol.  It kept the area along and west in the snow the entire (well most) of the time.  06z GEFS support that.

6z gfs sucked for dc. Way to close for comfort even into loudoun

I think you should inform your FB cult that this has huge bust potential and be prepared for 2-4" with lots of sleet/rain

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ji said:
10 minutes ago, yoda said:
disagree on the i95 corridor... 06z GFS was just right lol.  It kept the area along and west in the snow the entire (well most) of the time.  06z GEFS support that.

6z gfs sucked for dc. Way to close for comfort even into loudoun

I think verbatim Wed. 10 pm to 4am a lot of snow will be sticking everywhere if GFS verified.  Rates should overcome surface temps slightly above freezing in the corridor and se.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Weather Will said:

I think verbatim Wed. 10 pm to 4am a lot of snow will be sticking everywhere if GFS verified.  Rates should overcome surface temps slightly above freezing in the corridor and se.

Some people here are DC and east. There’s a 40 on the map you posted sitting right beside of DC. You’re not overcoming 40 with rates.

Of course, I still believe that the cad will been more stout than forecast and that any warmup will be very brief. I think the places from here on east are gonna get creamed once that low gains enough latitude to put us in the back side.

  • Like 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, WinterWxLuvr said:

Some people here are DC and east. There’s a 40 on the map you posted sitting right beside of DC. You’re not overcoming 40 with rates.

Of course, I still believe that the cad will been more stout than forecast and that any warmup will be very brief. I think the places from here on east are gonna get creamed once that low gains enough latitude to put us in the back side.

The 40 I think is at 3pm.  By 10 pm surface temps are falling toward freezing and rates are still good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

Some people here are DC and east. There’s a 40 on the map you posted sitting right beside of DC. You’re not overcoming 40 with rates.

Of course, I still believe that the cad will been more stout than forecast and that any warmup will be very brief. I think the places from here on east are gonna get creamed once that low gains enough latitude to put us in the back side.

Gotta have some backside love over here.

Did I just send out an RR signal?

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

Yes. That’s your hole card. Now if you get the cad to do it’s work, you’ll be good at the beginning as well.

The CAD will look good at the beginning, but one thing you learn living here is how quickly it can be overcome with marine warmth when there is an easterly fetch. If we had a true blocking pattern with an ideal slow moving/quasi stationary 50-50 low, the cold would stay more locked in here, and it would probably just sleet for a time rather than rain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Good synopsis from Mount Holly this morning-

00Z Guidance retains rather impressive run-to-run consistency with respect to timing, track, and associated thermal profiles with the low, and this is perhaps helped by the progressive hemispheric pattern which tends to favor more predictability than amplified blocking patterns. Consequently despite considerable uncertainty regarding the details of this system (more on that below) do have higher than average confidence that at least portions of our area will see potentially significant impacts from this system. The one thing to point out is that the mid-lvl wave associated with this system is still over the Pacific which does favor at least some caution in becoming too confident although modern Data Assimilation is fairly robust even in regions of observational sparsity.

Unfortunately (or fortunately if you look at it from my perspective) it is too early to get specific about ptypes and snow amounts, as the low`s track near to the coast will almost certainly result in some ptype transition zone. Furthermore this transition zone will likely ebb and flow as mesoscale lift (e.g. FGEN) results in dynamical cooling. That being said the antecedent airmass does look primed for wintry precipitation, with pre-storm dewpoints likely in the single digits or low- teens which should support some fairly notable wet-bulbing with the first batch of precip. The question then becomes can the intensity of the precipitation and associated dynamical cooling become enough to offset the increasing warm advection associated with the low? The next question is how robust will precipitation be on the back side of the low Wednesday night as it pulls away from the area, and cold advection begins? We should have more answers to these questions in the next couple days we enter the Mesoscale model window.

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CAPE said:

Good synopsis from Mount Holly this morning-

00Z Guidance retains rather impressive run-to-run consistency with respect to timing, track, and associated thermal profiles with the low, and this is perhaps helped by the progressive hemispheric pattern which tends to favor more predictability than amplified blocking patterns. Consequently despite considerable uncertainty regarding the details of this system (more on that below) do have higher than average confidence that at least portions of our area will see potentially significant impacts from this system. The one thing to point out is that the mid-lvl wave associated with this system is still over the Pacific which does favor at least some caution in becoming too confident although modern Data Assimilation is fairly robust even in regions of observational sparsity.

Unfortunately (or fortunately if you look at it from my perspective) it is too early to get specific about ptypes and snow amounts, as the low`s track near to the coast will almost certainly result in some ptype transition zone. Furthermore this transition zone will likely ebb and flow as mesoscale lift (e.g. FGEN) results in dynamical cooling. That being said the antecedent airmass does look primed for wintry precipitation, with pre-storm dewpoints likely in the single digits or low- teens which should support some fairly notable wet-bulbing with the first batch of precip. The question then becomes can the intensity of the precipitation and associated dynamical cooling become enough to offset the increasing warm advection associated with the low? The next question is how robust will precipitation be on the back side of the low Wednesday night as it pulls away from the area, and cold advection begins? We should have more answers to these questions in the next couple days we enter the Mesoscale model window.

I need to get myself back east because this is literally everything I've been mentioning. There will come a time

  • Like 7
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...