Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 2020 Discussion


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Well, you live in Toronto.....no fan of winter weather residing in SNE should prefer a la nina March to that of el nino.

I realize that there are exceptions to this.

No, I definitely agree. I meant to say of late. Nino Marches are great up here for the most part too.  I would gladly take a repeat of March 2007, 2005, or 2003 just to name a few. The past couple Nino Marches have been trash, i.e. 2020, 2019, 2016, 2010, etc. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Snowstorms said:

No, I definitely agree. I meant to say of late. Nino Marches are great up here for the most part too.  I would gladly take a repeat of March 2007, 2005, or 2003 just to name a few. The past couple Nino Marches have been trash, i.e. 2020, 2019, 2016, 2010, etc. 

Well, the past two el ninos were crap.....2010 was a fluke, and 2016 was the super event.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Weakening la nina leading to a big second half...if we have a good second half, then it will be due to a SSW. There is a lag between ENSO and the atmosphere....climo dictates that la nina winters do not have big finishes.

Agree with you 100%. He keeps using the Euro to push this story line, which was horrible with this Niña. It was the last to the party and kept insisting on barely a weak event. The CFS, which did a very good job is actually showing a secondary peak in 3.4 come January. Over the last month or so, the eastern ENSO regions have actually been warming and the western regions have been cooling. nino34Mon.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Well, the past two el ninos were crap.....2010 was a fluke, and 2016 was the super event.

Well you can apply the exact same logic for 2012 then. 2012 was garbage for everyone. So, I don't see how March 2010 was a fluke, the blocking weakened, and Nino took over. The last two Nina Marches were better for areas further south like NYC. Due to stronger ENSO forcing as winter wears on, Nina Marches generally tend to be colder than Nino Marches due to Alaskan ridging. There are exceptions, you're right. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Snowstorms said:

Well you can apply the exact same logic for 2012 then. 2012 was garbage for everyone. So, I don't see how March 2010 was a fluke, the blocking weakened, and Nino took over. The last two Nina Marches were better for areas further south like NYC. Due to stronger ENSO forcing as winter wears on, Nina Marches generally tend to be colder than Nino Marches due to Alaskan ridging. There are exceptions, you're right. 

Are you really trying to compare March 2012 to March 2010?

I think that you need to so some serious homework, and then reengage me.

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, dendrite said:

Not a lot of difference at the sfc...GFS still struggling with the CAD. I fully expect to be stuck in the 30s for the duration...a little IP/ZR and then a cold rain at best.

We'll see what the Euro does at 12z....but I'm somewhat on the more suppressed train at the moment where the sfc high builds down. I'd expect the GFS to be the last model to see it.

12z Ukie is building the high in out ahead of the system

 

Dec8_12zUkie96.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

We'll see what the Euro does at 12z....but I'm somewhat on the more suppressed train at the moment where the sfc high builds down. I'd expect the GFS to be the last model to see it.

12z Ukie is building the high in out ahead of the system

 

Dec8_12zUkie96.png

This is going to begin our 12/07, 12/08 like run.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

This is going to begin our 12/07, 12/08 like run.

I hope....lol....I still think we're prob screwed down here for this weekend, but NNE may end up pretty wintry on this one. But we may have a couple legit threats behind this one. That blocking lingers up in the arctic, so I won't be surprised to see a general trend more favorable during that period.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Are you really trying to compare March 2012 to March 2010?

I think that you need to so some serious homework, and then reengage me.

I'm not comparing the two. March 2012 was historic and remains in a league of its own.  But March 2010 was warm too except for the southern states. Two different ENSO states. The only difference is once the blocking weakened in 2009-10, the Nino forcing took over the pattern leading to a warm March. The blocking in 2010-11, a strong Nina, weakened by late February too. But once the Nina took over most of us in the NE ended up cooler or near average. But I'm 100% sure anyone south of NYC would take a Nino over a Nina. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The pattern did go to shit later in March 2010, but the only reason that was not a big snow month is because the system early in the month retrograded so far to the west due to the strong block. March 2012 was just a wall-to-wall furnace.

That whole winter was a furnace for all of us. You can say the exact same thing for last winter since the two winters had similar patterns. March 2020 was warm for all of us. You can run the exact same graph for the last 10 Nino's (2020, 2019, 2016, 2015, 2010, 2007, 2005, 2003, 1998 and 1995) and Nina's (2018, 2017, 2012, 2011, 2009, 2008, 2006, 2001, 2000, 1999) and tell me what you get. 

  • Confused 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, weathafella said:

No it’s equally predictive according to statistics .

The vast majority of climate data is technically statistically insignificant. I'm quite confident that you can run the data back to 1850 or whatever for Boston and mod-strong nina March will be below the general March mean snowfall.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

The pattern did go to shit later in March 2010, but the only reason that was not a big snow month is because the system early in the month retrograded so far to the west due to the strong block. March 2012 was just a wall-to-wall furnace.

Maine was the slight outlier, as shown on the temp anomaly maps.  March 2010 didn't get anywhere near 80 - topped out in mid 60s - but never got down lower than 11 and at my place had 28 AN days.  2012 had that incredible 6-day run of 20-28° AN but also was subzero on the 6th and had 11 days with BN temps.  2012 had 50% of average precip and 80% (14.6") of average snowfall.  2010 had 180% of average precip and 3% (0.6") of average snowfall.  Maine was different because it was closer to the January retro-bomb that ate our winter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I'm not sure what your point is....are you trying to tell me that the winter of 2009-2010 wasn't any more hostile with respect to SNE snowfall than the 2011-2012 season because all winters are mild due to GW?

My point was that Nina Marches are generally colder than Nino Marches due to the background ENSO state or at least they have been of late. That's all I was trying to say from the start. Snowfall is subjective because it depends on geographic location especially by March. There are exceptions but ideally you want a colder month than a warmer month. I’m not familiar with everyone’s snowfall records/averages in March. 

Edit: Anyhow, didn't mean to create this allusive argument. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

I hope....lol....I still think we're prob screwed down here for this weekend, but NNE may end up pretty wintry on this one. But we may have a couple legit threats behind this one. That blocking lingers up in the arctic, so I won't be surprised to see a general trend more favorable during that period.

Definitely watch D9's space - 

More so than the average ... GEF individual members carrying coherent signal into 80 - 70 longitudes ... with typical spread as to geography for this range - they all have something. That in itself is sufficient at this range to warrant -

And as you/we've been noting - ongoing -AO probably not being assessed entirely correctly as to how it influences ...particularly when on-going PNA's neutral - the latter conceptually sprays buckshot Pac waves capable of getting things done, while gambling on polar boundary placements out ahead.

One other things folks, - be advised that the pattern we are being handed by the blends and individual runs is an anomalously progressive one.  "Accuracy" in timing and placement becomes premium... It's an interesting philosophical quandary of sorts...because - to me - we are above normal confidence in systems of interest, while simultaneously below the threshold of confidence in visualizing what those will entail.. 

I tend to agree with Will that an icer/mixier look for C-NNE is on the table of the weekend... But again, the D9 is red flagged and has been showing up in the EPS and GEFs with unusual coherence ... Could be a PD-model ordeal in that time span -

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...