Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

December 2020 Discussion


40/70 Benchmark
 Share

Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

I just read this.

And yes i can confirm NWS Zones had 18-24 the night before...lots a huge amounts from local stations, i went pretty conservative and still busted high. We changed over to heavy sleet and snow, some of the heaviest ive seen by 10am and it was supposed to snow all day. I was definitely dissapointed with 9.9 on a 12-20 forecast from myself and NWS 18-24. Could have been worse though, you could have been expected warning amounts and ended up with 2" in KGON. Last minute bumps NW FTL.

It was still a great season though and we did have a big boy 10-18 statewide the month before with lots of TSSN. Jan had a nice daytime blizzard as well.

Fyi..

03_12.17_snow_forecast_UPDATED.thumb.jpg.de9880b7d017c3fa70db99a3e90b4620.jpg03_12.17_snow_totals.thumb.jpg.1f5f8b3b6c2274f38dd07f298a6bed1e.jpg

StormTotalSnowWeb1.thumb.png.a2efe18dec713bd038413f1b71cba9c5.png1518510399_StormTotalSnowWeb(1).thumb.png.b5d30ceb69ba0bbf4d52b73b89efb6b9.pngC6yU4VMXUAANqre.thumb.jpg.1c235fcccbc843447f81246490088286.jpgC60vLZIWoAApZuq.thumb.jpg.623365e655860700db9e8792af438281.jpg5b905e397d8de.image.thumb.jpg.64170b541e9a464db8f14f196a9623a1.jpg

 

 

 

Yea, not great lol

 

The Eastern Mass Weather snowfall forecast for the intense system that traversed the region yesterday was fair, as it was was slightly too high in general across the area. The storm trended even further west than we had anticipated that it would, which entailed warmer air making headway into the area:

Blizzard%2Bof%2B2017%253A%2BFINAL%2BCALL.png
Forecast was Slightly Too Robust, Especially from I-95 Points North and West

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Global models continue to signal a southern stream-dominated low
pressure system that could approach and pass nearby sometime
from Wednesday into Wednesday night impacting the local area.
Will not be making any significant changes to the current
forecast during this time period being this is still far out in
time. Right now it appears that the most likely precipitation
types would be rain at the coast and a wintry mix inland with
the possibility of light snow towards the tail end late
Wednesday night, but this has plenty of time to change. High
pressure builds back across the area on Thursday.

:blink:

Um....

 

  • Haha 1
  • Confused 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ensembles are all pointing to a near 40/70 track. Perfect strong high placement to the north. It's possible it can go either way, id lean towards more offshore though. Right now it appears to be mainly a white event not rain. What exactly is pointing to most likely being all rain at the coast and mix inland with possibly light snow at the very end? That's almost ridiculous to say. Terrible AFD long term write up imo.

BOX on the other hand, doesn't seem to be sniffing glue this morning.

Way more reasonable for the overall view of things.

Still a considerable amount of uncertainty in this timeframe. Not
too much of a change from the previous shift where the EPS/GEFS
shows clustering of surface lows near the benchmark. Still too early
to latch onto things given there still is a decent amount of spread
amongst ensemble and deterministic guidance. The operational GFS/CMC
do show impacts from the system, but more of a glancing blow in
comparison to the operational EC. Does appear that colder air should
be aided in being locked in with a surface high in place over
Quebec. Right now models show 925 hPa temperature ranging from 0 to -
15 degree Celsius. Given the uncertainty this far out have kept with
the NBM guidance and capped at high chance PoPs. Still much too
early for specifics. If a coastal storm pans out there could be some
coastal flooding concerns given the high astro tides and strong wind
gusts. Could also have significant snowfall, but really need to hone
in on specific details which are impossible to discern this far
out. Stay tuned for future updates.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, RUNNAWAYICEBERG said:

39 here with r/s. I don’t pay much attention to their forecasts anyway. I’ll use it as a sounding board after I gather info from here. 

Were obv at the point where you just go chance pops. But at least BOX has the right idea with snow in the zones as the main ptype. It's not like i use it for anything i just had some spare time and figure id read the AFDs. BOX AFD 10/10, OKX AFD :axe:/10

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The 4 Seasons said:

Were obv at the point where you just go chance pops. But at least BOX has the right idea with snow in the zones as the main ptype. It's not like i use it for anything i just had some spare time and figure id read the AFDs. BOX AFD 10/10, OKX AFD :axe:/10

Of course. We are far out but they could have a better AFD like BOX. Some weenies are paying attention reading those. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The 4 Seasons said:

Were obv at the point where you just go chance pops. But at least BOX has the right idea with snow in the zones as the main ptype. It's not like i use it for anything i just had some spare time and figure id read the AFDs. BOX AFD 10/10, OKX AFD :axe:/10

Virtually everyone is saying rain/snow coast right now. OKX seems in line with that thinking at this time range. You're splitting hairs on a D6 forecast that they may have just kept the default grids without wasting any time tweaking something that's going to change a bunch of times anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

I'm not super-negative on January...I think it will back and forth, more hostile as we go along....February is awful, I think....but expect some mid atl event(s).

NAO according to GEFS already trending towards neutral. Do not have EPS so not sure if it aligns. Hopefully it will go negative again.

image.thumb.png.ceb9f008d95fab5df7b2215390e547a1.png

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, snowman21 said:

Virtually everyone is saying rain/snow coast right now. OKX seems in line with that thinking at this time range. You're splitting hairs on a D6 forecast that they may have just kept the default grids without wasting any time tweaking something that's going to change a bunch of times anyway.

It said rain at the coast and r/s inland. Thats different. Alsoim really not splitting hairs when im just talking about the overall conveyance of communication of the look of the storm on the AFD, not talking about the grids or zones. BOXs was spot on and imo, conveyed what we're all seeing while OKX read like a mainly liquid event. Either way its still 5.5 days out now.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, The 4 Seasons said:

Ensembles are all pointing to a near 40/70 track. Perfect strong high placement to the north. It's possible it can go either way, id lean towards more offshore though. Right now it appears to be mainly a white event not rain. What exactly is pointing to most likely being all rain at the coast and mix inland with possibly light snow at the very end? That's almost ridiculous to say. Terrible AFD long term write up imo.

BOX on the other hand, doesn't seem to be sniffing glue this morning.

Way more reasonable for the overall view of things.


Still a considerable amount of uncertainty in this timeframe. Not
too much of a change from the previous shift where the EPS/GEFS
shows clustering of surface lows near the benchmark. Still too early
to latch onto things given there still is a decent amount of spread
amongst ensemble and deterministic guidance. The operational GFS/CMC
do show impacts from the system, but more of a glancing blow in
comparison to the operational EC. Does appear that colder air should
be aided in being locked in with a surface high in place over
Quebec. Right now models show 925 hPa temperature ranging from 0 to -
15 degree Celsius. Given the uncertainty this far out have kept with
the NBM guidance and capped at high chance PoPs. Still much too
early for specifics. If a coastal storm pans out there could be some
coastal flooding concerns given the high astro tides and strong wind
gusts. Could also have significant snowfall, but really need to hone
in on specific details which are impossible to discern this far
out. Stay tuned for future updates.

You didn't ask me but ... your post sort of provides a nice platform for which one can rant and bitch about this stupid p.o.s. ... 

Which it is to me... 

There are three issues with it that are bugging me - 

1  ... the 'synoptic canvas,' which includes three metrics in itself:   orientation of r-wave construction and d(morphology); timing of individual impulses - hugely also modified by the former; speed of the flow.   The bold there is key for me ... I'm waiting to see/giving the flow a chance to change - so far...I am not seeing that, but there is plenty of time for that with 6 days of lead..granted.  But the speed of the flow is detriment, as is... As is also the timing ... which we have discussed the 'buck-shot' Pac in a flat flow causing wave spacing issues .. that is also not really resolving very well for me. 

2 ... the heights in the deep south... GOM/Florida .. off the SE Coast are running hot and this appears to be anchored at hemispheric scales.. In other words, there's not merely a deep wave in TX building those heights from latent heat flop ... the hgts are high prior to and during these waves ejecting and gliding overtop like rocks skipping off a pond.  Even if d(morphology) - delta pattern/change, were to catch up here and start effecting more amplitude/positive/wave interference ... that factor would then "emerge" as a shearing mitigator.  The 00z ICON solution shows this without even having .. the entire positive vorticity field is pulled and stretched into a 'continental ribbon' - if you will ... looks like a parade streamer. That is the flow speeding up in tandem and "absorbing" the S/W wind mechanics... that's what that is... ( I call this the Miami Rule ) ... It's not an absolute neggie wave interference...  The narrowing of the storm structure and the speed up over the last 4 or so cycles of models ... smacks as related to that.. but it's hard to separate that from just a having a firehose hemisphere anyway - 

3 ... that high pressure up there - assuming it is more correctly handled... it is not being assessed as a BL inhibitor/magnitude there in at this range.  No way... If that high is right..and this thing comes off the MA at that polarward angle and speed and size... it will hygroscopic annihilate a flat middling faster mover.  

All these can certainly change in 6 days ...duh, but from where I am sitting... this looked this way yesterday frankly, and seeing these models "shrink" the storm size and speed it up/progressive ... fits better for now. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, STILL N OF PIKE said:

I’ll be interested by Sunday pm if this looks solid . . Haven’t looked at models Other than a few posts Here. It’s got a ways 

Sunday looks like a nice day to get outside .

Pattern does look intriguing after Monday 

Hopefully by Sunday the models haven’t moved towards Tippy’s fast flow regime dominance,  making this a weaker slightly more progressive system that gets shunted SE by a pressing Quebec High.  There would be a pedestrian traffic jam of Tobin Bridge jumpers if we are looking at “congrats South Coast”. 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, HIPPYVALLEY said:

Hopefully by Sunday the models haven’t moved towards Tippy’s fast flow regime dominance,  making this a weaker slightly more progressive system that gets shunted SE by a pressing Quebec High.  There would be a pedestrian traffic jam of Tobin Bridge jumpers if we are looking at “congrats South Coast”. 

I favor that, as well. I'm fine with some snow, but I wouldn't expect 1'+.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, 40/70 Benchmark said:

Yea, not great lol

 

The Eastern Mass Weather snowfall forecast for the intense system that traversed the region yesterday was fair, as it was was slightly too high in general across the area. The storm trended even further west than we had anticipated that it would, which entailed warmer air making headway into the area:

Blizzard%2Bof%2B2017%253A%2BFINAL%2BCALL.png
Forecast was Slightly Too Robust, Especially from I-95 Points North and West

 

We at e Mass Wx

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, dryslot said:

I do as well, Its almost a let down when the event arrives, As i look for the next one.

That empty, hollow feeling when the snow starts winding down and post-storm depression starts settling in. There's nothing on the horizon thats even remotely got a chance so you retreat to the 384hr GFS panels and then all of a sudden you realize, I've got a serious problem.

  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, The 4 Seasons said:

That empty, hollow feeling when the snow starts winding down and post-storm depression starts settling in. There's nothing on the horizon thats even remotely got a chance so you retreat to the 384hr GFS panels and then all of a sudden you realize, I've got a serious problem.

Its actually a sickness, And i have been prescribed Crown Royal to help cope with my addiction.

  • Like 2
  • Haha 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...