Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

Winter 2020-21 Medium/Long Range Discussion


Hoosier
 Share

Recommended Posts

57 minutes ago, SchaumburgStormer said:

And were we tracking the latest first 1” snow at ORD recently as well? If I recall, we managed to screw that up with about a week to go. 

That was 2012-13, and it did break the record.  It took until January 25 to get the first 1" calendar day snow.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, michsnowfreak said:

I meant locking in in terms of what areas get hit and what areas don't. if a storms missing us we don't pay as close attention, but for those getting hit by the storm location matters. 

Yeah seems to be a somewhat consistent track over central to east central IA. MSP been looking good for several runs on various models. Will see if that holds up.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, michsnowfreak said:

Interesting. The extended cfs maps which are equivalent to giving a 3 year old a crayon, are known for their constant changing from run to run (hell you can see record warmth and record cold for a certain timeframe from run to run)...but I've noticed some real cold showing up towards late January and early February. This is the dead of winter so anomalous cold will be very wintry. 

If by wintry you mean more than just cold, that's not guaranteed. Especially with Chicago's history. There's another 98-99. Think of it as the evil twin of the more recent. While the EC from Florida on northeast "enjoyed" one the all-time historical (what's the acronym HECS?) blizzards in the nation's memory, Chicagoans dealt with frozen tundra.

From that other futility thread:

Quote

Hey beavis, thought you would like to know that Chicago came awfully close to having an 83 day sub 1" streak in 1898-99.  The only thing that interrupted was a 1" snow, on the nose, on January 17, 1899.  Had that not occurred, it would've run from December 1, 1898 through February 21, 1899.

Remains to be seen exactly which "98-99" analog this winter follows, but my hand is primed to move my $$ from the younger to the elder

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/24/2020 at 11:25 AM, RCNYILWX said:

Both winter 2009-10 and 2010-11 had deeply -NAOs, 09-10 pretty much wire to wire, and were good winters for Chicago. The blocking in 2011 eroded in time for GHD I. That's not a statement about how things may go here the next few weeks, but just a note to point out a -NAO can be good here.  

 

 

With respect to moving forward, the ensembles also show a +EPO look with the big NAO block (backed up by the forecast teleconnection indices), so that could help prevent it from being more torchy and *maybe* assist in keeping some systems farther south. The deep blocking may come too late to help us next week though.

 

 

 

 

 

East based -NAOs are great especially for the eastern Lakes. As long as the West based -NAO isn't off the charts it can be good for everyone as well. Too much and it suppression city.

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Idk, I’m always skeptical about these secondaries producing anything meaningful. Strung out GFS shunt east seems most likely to me

It’s not a secondary, it’s the main system on most guidance now. The initial wave ejection is turning into a glorified front/overrunning event now.


.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

That pattern could produce snow events because of the assistance of the strong -NAO to modulate the +EPO some. It's certainly not a cold pattern. I'm not on the optimism train, just saying that's not a lock to be snowless like this month has been. The 850 mb positive anomalies are not obscene and the mean 850 mb 0C line is near or south of I-70. If we get a lower amplitude wave, could snow here with that.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, RCNYILWX said:

That pattern could produce snow events because of the assistance of the strong -NAO to modulate the +EPO some. It's certainly not a cold pattern. I'm not on the optimism train, just saying that's not a lock to be snowless like this month has been. The 850 mb positive anomalies are not obscene and the mean 850 mb 0C line is near or south of I-70. If we get a lower amplitude wave, could snow here with that.

Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk
 

I agree. It's not the greatest pattern ever but it has the potential to produce under the right circumstances. Also to add to what you said, we've got a somewhat active STJ as well. If we can have the storms digging a bit more, we can certainly see some decent storms. It's like a hybrid Nino/Nina pattern mix. On the Pacific side we see the Nina trying to fight and take control of the pattern with a flat NP ridge just north of Hawaii, whereas we have a strong Aleutian low near Alaska, a common Nino feature. Do you think the forecasted trade wind burst coming this week will allow the Nina to have greater influence on our pattern? Specifically in helping to build an Aleutian ridge to cool down Canada. There's other reasons to be optimistic about, one specifically being a potential SSW by mid January. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...