CAPE Posted November 20, 2020 Author Share Posted November 20, 2020 24 minutes ago, WxUSAF said: We’ve got “extreme weather bullseye” working in our favor Better than atmospheric memory. We really need it to forget. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frd Posted November 20, 2020 Share Posted November 20, 2020 IRI update. Maybe some minor implications. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frd Posted November 21, 2020 Share Posted November 21, 2020 This is interesting, especially the what occurs after the first of the year, when the favored MJO phase(s) tends to change. This seems to be related to the Nina peaking in the OND period and then waning thereafter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 On 11/17/2020 at 3:34 PM, StormchaserChuck! said: My Summer N. Atlantic SST = Winter NAO index, is 9-1-4 in the last 14 years. It was more than 1.5SD off last Winter, but the average SD is 0.55. It comes in at -0.15 for the Winter, about Neutral. (Warm upper box is negative, Cold lower box is negative). I would say that's -0.10 even. Most bombed the arctic last season....I think all of the smoke from the fires really augmented the PV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted November 23, 2020 Share Posted November 23, 2020 On 11/17/2020 at 3:34 PM, StormchaserChuck! said: My Summer N. Atlantic SST = Winter NAO index, is 9-1-4 in the last 14 years. It was more than 1.5SD off last Winter, but the average SD is 0.55. It comes in at -0.15 for the Winter, about Neutral. (Warm upper box is negative, Cold lower box is negative). I would say that's -0.10 even. I don't think that you will be too far off this season. I think I went with + .25 to .55 range...basically neutral-positive. I think most would take a near neutral NAO and run, this year. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 8 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I don't think that you will be too far off this season. I think I went with + .25 to .55 range...basically neutral-positive. I think most would take a near neutral NAO and run, this year. lol depends how we get that numerical average. A neutral NAO with a crap pac doesn't really do us any good. But if the average is derived from a mix of positive and negative periods...that would be just fine as the negative periods would present windows of opportunity for us. Furthermore...there are times when the NAO can be negative but from an anomaly in a position that does us very little good...(extremely east based -NAO) and there are times we can get a bootleg block near the western edge of the NAO domain and the NAO numerical value is actually neutral yet the pattern is great for us. The devil is in the details. 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
40/70 Benchmark Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 13 hours ago, psuhoffman said: depends how we get that numerical average. A neutral NAO with a crap pac doesn't really do us any good. But if the average is derived from a mix of positive and negative periods...that would be just fine as the negative periods would present windows of opportunity for us. Furthermore...there are times when the NAO can be negative but from an anomaly in a position that does us very little good...(extremely east based -NAO) and there are times we can get a bootleg block near the western edge of the NAO domain and the NAO numerical value is actually neutral yet the pattern is great for us. The devil is in the details. I think you read a bit too much into that....all I meant was a neutral NAO beats the hell out of the exotic positives that we have grown accustomed to. I never said its the entire story HAHA. I lived through 2009-2010 here in SNE, so trust that I know a negative NAO is not a panacea. lol You are also correct that there is more to the NAO domain than the assigned numerical index value. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted November 24, 2020 Share Posted November 24, 2020 3 hours ago, 40/70 Benchmark said: I think you read a bit too much into that....all I meant was a neutral NAO beats the hell out of the exotic positives that we have grown accustomed to. I never said its the entire story HAHA. I lived through 2009-2010 here in SNE, so trust that I know a negative NAO is not a panacea. lol You are also correct that there is more to the NAO domain than the assigned numerical index value. Sorry I know you knew all that. My post was meant to add for some others who might be reading. I should be more clear about that when I post though. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormchaserChuck! Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 Horrible 3-month Winter by CPC, It proves they don't really know what's going on. I'm kind of looking forward to a -0.10 DJFM NAO prediction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormchaserChuck! Posted November 26, 2020 Share Posted November 26, 2020 On 11/23/2020 at 11:33 AM, 40/70 Benchmark said: Most bombed the arctic last season....I think all of the smoke from the fires really augmented the PV. I think someone bought up all the cold Winter derivatives lol. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
frd Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 Interesting 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted December 1, 2020 Share Posted December 1, 2020 1 hour ago, frd said: Interesting Well now...gotta that possible connection! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eskimo Joe Posted December 2, 2020 Share Posted December 2, 2020 This is a good advance, IMO. Here's a link to the full release which shows that RAOB and commercial aircraft data will be added as well: https://www.weather.gov/media/notification/pdf2/scn20-46rapv5_hrrr_v4aab.pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 On 12/1/2020 at 1:11 PM, frd said: Interesting 2013/14 is interesting because if you ignore the central equatorial pacific (raging Nina right now) the rest of the global SST anomaly patterns are very similar. 2013 Now 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weather Will Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 WB 6Z GFS Day 10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Maestrobjwa Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 13 hours ago, psuhoffman said: 2013/14 is interesting because if you ignore the central equatorial pacific (raging Nina right now) the rest of the global SST anomaly patterns are very similar. 2013 Now Huh...wonder what 2013-14 would've looked like with a nina? Lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prestige Worldwide Posted December 3, 2020 Share Posted December 3, 2020 Embrace the torch Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted December 4, 2020 Share Posted December 4, 2020 17 hours ago, Prestige Worldwide said: Embrace the torch bamwx has no idea how to run a business. who would post warm models during winter 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 Here's my speculation ... not much will happen in December, until possibly late in the month, January will be quite variable and will bring one or two decent winter storm scenarios, February will continue that trend for about the first half then turn very warm, March will be a warmish month too, perhaps one late snowfall event even into early April. Overall, a fairly average winter but some good spells for winter enthusiasts, some not so great. Persistent west coast ridge development can be expected, downstream from that, two different patterns may oscillate, one would be highly amped flow favoring inland storm track and mild temperatures in your region, the other would be a broad trough with the polar vortex dropping into Hudson Bay and Quebec, possible snowfall events might come then as storm track would be something like the current event only with more cold air around in mid-winter. Best analogue would be 1975-76. Did you get much snow that winter? I was living in Ontario then, we had a lot of lake effect and some transient low pressure snowfalls and an early end to winter with record highs around Feb 25 to 29. The March 1976 storm track must have been through PA and NY because we had very heavy mixed falls for a few days, sleet and ice pellets, it all turned to rain and there was a severe flood when the heavy winter snow pack melted. From what I recall there were not a lot of coastal lows that winter. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 37 minutes ago, Roger Smith said: Here's my speculation ... not much will happen in December, until possibly late in the month, January will be quite variable and will bring one or two decent winter storm scenarios, February will continue that trend for about the first half then turn very warm, March will be a warmish month too, perhaps one late snowfall event even into early April. Overall, a fairly average winter but some good spells for winter enthusiasts, some not so great. Persistent west coast ridge development can be expected, downstream from that, two different patterns may oscillate, one would be highly amped flow favoring inland storm track and mild temperatures in your region, the other would be a broad trough with the polar vortex dropping into Hudson Bay and Quebec, possible snowfall events might come then as storm track would be something like the current event only with more cold air around in mid-winter. Best analogue would be 1975-76. Did you get much snow that winter? I was living in Ontario then, we had a lot of lake effect and some transient low pressure snowfalls and an early end to winter with record highs around Feb 25 to 29. The March 1976 storm track must have been through PA and NY because we had very heavy mixed falls for a few days, sleet and ice pellets, it all turned to rain and there was a severe flood when the heavy winter snow pack melted. From what I recall there were not a lot of coastal lows that winter. You are kidding right? Hopefully this is you just having a dark sense of humor. 1976 was one of the absolute worst Nina winters in our area ever. It was virtually snowless in much of our region. DC finished with 2" for the whole season from a few very minor cartoppers...didn't even get 1" from a single storm all winter. The northern 1/3 of our region got a moderate snowstorm very late that winter in mid March...the rest of the region pretty much had no snow all winter except a few 1/2" naissance events. That year is a nina nightmare cautionary tale here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 @Roger Smith 1976 was similar to last year around here...in that it was what we get when you have a raging +NAM and a crap PAC and ATL at the same time... no hope. The temps were colder that year due to a colder base state in general...but no way to get a frozen event and a favorable storm track in that setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roger Smith Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 Oh okay, I thought it might have been closer to average because with all that cold air around where I was (northeast of Toronto, we had a week where it never got above zero F) I figured the storm track must have been quite a bit to the south, I suppose it was just bad timing with the jet stream depressed but no energy. So maybe it will work out somewhat similar but with better timed energy. I do think the analogue will work out on a large scale but details like timing of energy can make a fairly substantial difference in a few places. Where I was, there was never all that much snow on the ground, wrong lake effect wind pattern (mostly NW, we did better with WNW) but some placed got absolutely buried in lake effect snow, for example, London ON. They had to go around and mark the positions of fire hydrants with 15 ft poles so the snowplows wouldn't shear them off. And all that was completely gone in about a week when it turned warm in mid to late February. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted December 5, 2020 Share Posted December 5, 2020 2 hours ago, Roger Smith said: Oh okay, I thought it might have been closer to average because with all that cold air around where I was (northeast of Toronto, we had a week where it never got above zero F) I figured the storm track must have been quite a bit to the south, I suppose it was just bad timing with the jet stream depressed but no energy. So maybe it will work out somewhat similar but with better timed energy. I do think the analogue will work out on a large scale but details like timing of energy can make a fairly substantial difference in a few places. Where I was, there was never all that much snow on the ground, wrong lake effect wind pattern (mostly NW, we did better with WNW) but some placed got absolutely buried in lake effect snow, for example, London ON. They had to go around and mark the positions of fire hydrants with 15 ft poles so the snowplows wouldn't shear them off. And all that was completely gone in about a week when it turned warm in mid to late February. Looking at the h5 I don’t think that winter was bad luck. We rarely get much snow with a longwave pattern that features a raging +EPO/AO/NAO and WAR. That combo is a shut out the lights no hope don’t bother even paying attention pattern here. Even if we do get cold (and there were some chilly periods in 76) anything that amplified would cut in that pattern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Snowy Hibbo Posted December 6, 2020 Share Posted December 6, 2020 In my winter forecast, I have found for an average to slightly above average winter in terms of snowfall for the Mid Atlantic. Based upon the possibility for a SSW, some positive analogs for ENSO and QBO, decent pre-season snow cover, etc. https://longrangesnowcenter.net/2020/12/06/north-america-winter-outlook-2020-21/ 3 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WxUSAF Posted December 9, 2020 Share Posted December 9, 2020 Lol not sure what the analog is for this QBO pattern Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
psuhoffman Posted December 9, 2020 Share Posted December 9, 2020 3 hours ago, WxUSAF said: Lol not sure what the analog is for this QBO pattern That was just one of the factors contributing to my extreme lack of confidence in seasonal forecasting lately. Or at least my own ability to make a seasonal forecast. I am sure there are those with a better grasp of things then me. But between the QBO acting erratically, a lower solar minimum then we are used too, an overall warmer profile then we have ever had, and some very unusual SST configurations we have never seen before...I don't feel confident in anything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormchaserChuck! Posted December 21, 2020 Share Posted December 21, 2020 How about that ~ -2.00 NAO for mid-late Dec/early Jan on 12z models! I wonder if that means it will be +NAO Jan 10-March because the N. Atlantic NAO index was -0.1 for the Winter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ji Posted December 21, 2020 Share Posted December 21, 2020 On 7/12/2020 at 6:42 AM, CAPE said: CFS has been on a "good" run lately with looks like these. No qualifiers necessary. We all know the deal with long range climate models. cfs nailed it lol? 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CAPE Posted December 21, 2020 Author Share Posted December 21, 2020 LOL it "nailed" that and about 10 different advertised longwave patterns since then. Multiple times. 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StormchaserChuck! Posted January 24, 2021 Share Posted January 24, 2021 It looks like no El Nino above +0.7 will form next year, so I would go with this as my Winter forecast for 21-22.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now