Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,611
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    NH8550
    Newest Member
    NH8550
    Joined

Winter 2020-21 Discussion


CAPE
 Share

Recommended Posts

But really...and maybe this is just a mild hunch, but...I feel like IF we are surprised in a good way this year, and it's only supposed to be one opportunity (as opposed to some '96 style anomaly all winter) it might just be in December. I base that off of nothing else but a hunch (and I admittedly smoked a little almanac too), and my expectations are still appropriately low! But this is 2020...lol

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Maestrobjwa said:

That one goes in the hall of shame. Stupid confluence to the north, lol 

I loved it down in Richmond... pretty fun. Felt pretty bad for everyone else up north as I watched it happen. The news stations here didn’t expect it to be much at all, but kept increasing the totals all night until we ended at our 10+ or so inches. A special someone harassed the news reports after that for awhile...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, CAPE said:

They both "mean something". You have to keep in mind it is a super LR mean- a monthly mean at that. I pay more attention to the height anomalies on these panels, as it is indicative of  where the features of interest may set up in general. Outside of a super blocked up pattern though, clearly there will be some shifts in the location and intensity of the + and -height anomalies.

Yeah, makes sense. And it’s an entire 30 or so days in one image. Here in that time, you can go from 80s to single digits three times in that amount of time. AND, as someone said, it’s the CFS.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Rhino16 said:

Yeah, makes sense. And it’s an entire 30 or so days in one image. Here in that time, you can go from 80s to single digits three times in that amount of time. AND, as someone said, it’s the CFS.

None of these seasonal/climate models are very good more than a month out. Even the Euro is pretty bad. That said, as a group they are worth monitoring to get some idea of the big picture pattern. Nice thing about the CFS is it constantly updates, and it has weeklies out to 6 weeks. Makes it more entertaining. It has been on one of its "good look" runs the past few days. What it is currently advertising for winter would be completely acceptable for this area.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am not anywhere close to as advanced in meteorology knowledge as some of you, but I do have some obscure stats. 

BWI has not had an 8+ inch snow total month(December through March) in 4 consecutive winters. BWI has NEVER went 5 consecutive winters doing that. 

BWI has went 5 consecutive winters with no double digit snow months twice. Never 6 consecutive. So we can tie that this winter. 

  • Sad 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Steve25 said:

I am not anywhere close to as advanced in meteorology knowledge as some of you, but I do have some obscure stats. 

BWI has not had an 8+ inch snow total month(December through March) in 4 consecutive winters. BWI has NEVER went 5 consecutive winters doing that. 

BWI has went 5 consecutive winters with no double digit snow months twice. Never 6 consecutive. So we can tie that this winter. 

Its happening this year!  We are gonna have an epic ns winter like 2014.  Get ready for over performing Clippers!

 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

I am starting to like the idea of a mini front loaded winter , however, in our case/area that may simply mean normal temps with a minor event. 

 

 

Meanwhile trends with the PV at this time maintain a normal seasonal progression, along the line of the ERA5 mean.  

Ensemble plume

 

 

Along with a supported - AO. Even though recent Octobers have exhibited a  - AO more so than in the heart of winter. 

 

ao.sprd2.gif

 

nao.sprd2.gif

 

Already spoken here is the possibility of a more so - NAO early in season . Although maybe more East based.  

 

And very interesting is this post, and the possible variations of the Nina and the effect on the NH 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, frd said:

 

I am starting to like the idea of a mini front loaded winter , however, in our case/area that may simply mean normal temps with a minor event. 

 

 

Meanwhile trends with the PV at this time maintain a normal seasonal progression, along the line of the ERA5 mean.  

Ensemble plume

 

 

Along with a supported - AO. Even though recent Octobers have exhibited a  - AO more so than in the heart of winter. 

 

ao.sprd2.gif

 

nao.sprd2.gif

 

Already spoken here is the possibility of a more so - NAO early in season . Although maybe more East based.  

 

And very interesting is this post, and the possible variations of the Nina and the effect on the NH 

 

 

 

A colder November and December, followed by a Jan, Feb, Mar torch would fit in perfectly with the classic “front end loaded” La Niña winter. That plot isn’t really showing a west-based, Greenland blocked -NAO, it’s showing a more east-based -NAO, as you said

Link to comment
Share on other sites

58 minutes ago, snowman19 said:

A colder November and December, followed by a Jan, Feb, Mar torch would fit in perfectly with the classic “front end loaded” La Niña winter. That plot isn’t really showing a west-based, Greenland blocked -NAO, it’s showing a more east-based -NAO, as you said

Thing is though that it can’t snow usually in a Nov Dec torch, but you can get lucky during a mild Jan Feb and even March. So if this is the only option we have it’s the best option to have.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

Thing is though that it can’t snow usually in a Nov Dec torch, but you can get lucky during a mild Jan Feb and even March. So if this is the only option we have it’s the best option to have.

Nov 1987 had a foot of snow between torch's...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

EL NIÑO/SOUTHERN OSCILLATION (ENSO)
DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION
issued by
CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER/NCEP/NWS
and the International Research Institute for Climate and Society
 
8 October 2020
 
 
 
Quote

Synopsis:  La Niña is likely to continue through the Northern Hemisphere winter 2020-21 (~85% chance) and into spring 2021 (~60% chance during February-April).

La Niña continued during September, as evidenced by below-average sea surface temperatures (SSTs) extending from the Date Line to the eastern Pacific Ocean [Fig. 1]. The SST indices in the two westernmost Nino regions, Nino-4 and Nino-3.4, cooled throughout the month, and the Nino-3.4 index was -1.1°C in the past week [Fig. 2]. The equatorial subsurface temperature anomalies (averaged from 180°-100°W) remained substantially unchanged [Fig. 3], and continued to reflect below-average temperatures from the surface to 200m depth in the eastern Pacific Ocean [Fig. 4]. The atmospheric circulation anomalies over the tropical Pacific Ocean remained consistent with La Niña. Low-level wind anomalies were easterly across most of the tropical Pacific, and upper-level wind anomalies were westerly over the east-central Pacific. Tropical convection continued to be suppressed from the western Pacific to the Date Line, and a slight enhancement of convection emerged over Indonesia [Fig. 5]. Also, both the Southern Oscillation and Equatorial Southern Oscillation indices remained positive. Overall, the coupled ocean-atmosphere system indicates the continuation of La Niña.

A majority of the models in the IRI/CPC plume predict La Nina (Niño-3.4 index less than -0.5°C) to persist through the Northern Hemisphere winter 2020-21 and to weaken during the spring [Fig. 6]. The latest forecasts from several models, including the NCEP CFSv2, suggest the likelihood of a moderate or even strong La Nina (Niño-3.4 index values < -1.0°C) during the peak November-January season. The forecaster consensus supports that view in light of significant atmosphere-ocean coupling already in place. In summary, La Niña is likely to continue through the Northern Hemisphere winter 2020-21 (~85% chance)

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

DCA Nov-Dec snow...ao/nao for biggest snowfalls...

year.....snow"...big snow".................................................AO..........................................NAO............................

2009....16.6"....16.4" 12/18-19.......................-4238 12/18....-5821 12/21........-2111 12/14....-1964 12/20

1962....16.2"......5.4" 12/25.............................-0656 12/25...-4159 12/31........-2046 12/25

1966....16.1"......6.7" 12/13...7.0" 12/23-24....-4147 12/13...-2343 12/23........-0101 12/13...+0503 12/23

1967....13.2"......6.9" 11/30...4.2" 12/31.........+1812 11/30...+0479 12/31.....+1196 11/30....-0883 12/31 ...includes Nov snow

1989....12.5"......4.5" 12/12-13.........................-3482 12/10...............................-1704 12/10....-0173 12/16   includes Nov snow...

1957....12.0"....11.4" 12/3-4............................-1395 12/1....+0899 12/4..........-1286 12/2.....+0221 12/6

1987....11.5"....11.6" 11/11..............................-0663 11/7....+1056 11/11.........-0286 11/7......+0603 11/11

1973....11.0"....10.2" 12/16-17.......................-1946 12/9......-0888 12/14.........-2792 12/19.......+0320 12/16....-0941 12/24

1960......8.7"......8.5" 12/11-12.......................-0082 12/12........-0781 12/9.......-0078 12/12

2002......7.1"......6.1" 12/5...............................-1938 12/5....................................-1381 12/1......-0351 12/4

1969......6.8"......5.1" 12/25-26........................-3259 12/21...-0971 12/26..........+0054 12/25....-0148 12/26

1953......6.7"......6.6" 11/6-7............................-0554 11/4.....+1291 11/7............+0068 11/5.......+0315 11/6

1982......6.6"......6.6" 12/12.............................-0696 12/12....+2284 12/16.........+1082 12/9......+0657 12/12

1963......6.4"......5.6" 12/23.............................-4470 12/20....+0129 12/23.........-2397 12/13.....-0103 12/23

2003......6.2"......3.6" 12/14.............................+1239 12/13....-0194 12/15.........+0539 12/14....-0015 12/15

1970......5.2"......4.9" 12/31.............................-2530 12/19....-1493 1/1/71..........-2434 12/25....-1731 12/31

2005......4.8"......3.9" 12/5-6............................-3569 12/5.......................................-0921 12/6

enso...la nina in blue...el nino in red...neutral in black...62-66-67 were weak negatives...2003 a weak positive...89 and 60 around neutral...

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CAPE said:

Having the AO in the negative phase is key for above avg snowfall in DC, and we typically see a -NAO when the AO is negative. It can happen other ways, but it mostly occurs when there is HL blocking.

Remember the Shrek intro where there’s a book he’s reading and he rips out the page and says “That’s never going to happen!”

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, CAPE said:
EL NIÑO/SOUTHERN OSCILLATION (ENSO)
DIAGNOSTIC DISCUSSION
issued by
CLIMATE PREDICTION CENTER/NCEP/NWS
and the International Research Institute for Climate and Society
 
8 October 2020
 
 
 

 

If the Niña actually does go strong in December, we can stick a fork in winter

  • Weenie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, WinterWxLuvr said:

Thing is though that it can’t snow usually in a Nov Dec torch, but you can get lucky during a mild Jan Feb and even March. So if this is the only option we have it’s the best option to have.

March is the month that is pretty much a toss up during La Niñas, some stay torchy, some go back to cold. January (more so mid-late January) and especially February are usually the torch months. November and December are normally cold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, snowman19 said:

March is the month that is pretty much a toss up during La Niñas, some stay torchy, some go back to cold. January (more so mid-late January) and especially February are usually the torch months. November and December are normally cold

This doesn't make much sense honestly. Plenty of variability in Nina winters, year to year and month to month.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Rhino16 said:

I had :weenie: for lunch... and you are what you eat. Nothing will stop me from believing it cannot be worse than last year. There’s no way I’ll only get half an inch or less.

Odds are this winter will be better in the snowfall dept. Would be difficult not to be. It could still be completely awful by most folk's standards though. If your yard received 6" of slop spread over 3-4 events, with 5 total days of snow on the ground, in an overall torchy winter, would that really be more satisfying than last winter?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

42 minutes ago, CAPE said:

Odds are this winter will be better in the snowfall dept. Would be difficult not to be. It could still be completely awful by most folk's standards though. If your yard received 6" of slop spread over 3-4 events, with 5 total days of snow on the ground, in an overall torchy winter, would that really be more satisfying than last winter?

Yes.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...