Jump to content
  • Member Statistics

    17,606
    Total Members
    7,904
    Most Online
    ArlyDude
    Newest Member
    ArlyDude
    Joined

May Discussion


weatherwiz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah, it is interesting to see the GFS attempting similarly ... I'd still suggest modulating that for obvious reasons - one is not typically going to score a win prognosticating off a -5 or more SD anomaly being accurately assessed by any guidance beyond D5 or 6...  That said the GEFs - based teleconnectors do carry a cold signal into May - so despite the balm that's likely Sat-Monday.. oy. 

I don't think that is going to be the same as 2005 May, tho... This cold pattern appears to be fuller loaded latitude integrated/hemispheric r-wave event compared to butt-bang of lore.  It's NW territory to Georgia coastal R-wave resonance with unusually sloped flow ...but, that is requiring double stream phasing/N-stream...  2005 May was a different scenario entirely - speaking to the straw man in the room here.  That was a cut-off low over the Del Marva that kept getting new back side jet inserts that would re-deepen it and re-engineer new coastal waves that in total pulled the entire structure back west across three separate oscillations some 3 to 4 days apart.  Such that some three weeks (basically gobbled up the entire month of May that year) was plagued with nearly identical weather:  48/41  NE wind and rain sheets.   I think the ORH hills picked up some sleet and mangled noodle or two in there, but by and large, it was  crime against humanity by God- him/herself...    

This situation isn't that... it's just a raging demo of seasonal lag ... one that probably would only last 3 to 5 days anyway ... the EPS mean is probably safer. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

Yeah, it is interesting to see the GFS attempting similarly ... I'd still suggest modulating that for obvious reasons - one is not typically going to score a win prognosticating off a -5 or more SD anomaly being accurately assessed by any guidance beyond D5 or 6...  That said the GEFs - based teleconnectors do carry a cold signal into May - so despite the balm that's likely Sat-Monday.. oy. 

I don't think that is going to be the same as 2005 May, tho... This cold pattern appears to be fuller loaded latitude integrated/hemispheric r-wave event compared to butt-bang of lore.  It's NW territory to Georgia coastal R-wave resonance with unusually sloped flow ...but, that is requiring double stream phasing/N-stream...  2005 May was a different scenario entirely - speaking to the straw man in the room here.  That was a cut-off low over the Del Marva that kept getting new back side jet inserts that would re-deepen it and re-engineer new coastal waves that in total pulled the entire structure back west across three separate oscillations some 3 to 4 days apart.  Such that some three weeks (basically gobbled up the entire month of May that year) was plagued with nearly identical weather:  48/41  NE wind and rain sheets.   I think the ORH hills picked up some sleet and mangled noodle or two in there, but by and large, it was  crime against humanity by God- him/herself...    

This situation isn't that... it's just a raging demo of seasonal lag ... one that probably would only last 3 to 5 days anyway ... the EPS mean is probably safer. 

Gotta love the 516 thicknesses over NYC for 5/10

 

May1_12zGFS216.png

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, powderfreak said:

Ha, prints out 3" of snow on Long Island on May 10th... with 6-12" in parts of New England.

 

 

22 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

The GFS is insane with that trough. Cranky!!!!!

Cranky said the cold was going to be cut off from the CONUS after 4/20

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

 

Cranky said the cold was going to be cut off from the CONUS after 4/20

I really wish folks would start ubiquitously gaining exposure to the cornucopia of studies formally being papered/peer-reviewed, that are frankly free now..  Baffling, but seasonal lag due to Pacific warm surplus folding over continental mean circulation eddies was floated by theoretical works in the 1990s even... 

well... here we are.  Would anyone with a modicum of cogency argue THAT up there isn't seasonal f'um lag?  It makes sense... because as May progresses into June...the continents concomitantly heat up, and that then stops the trough aspect of the Pac-ridge/continental trough coupling model.. 

It seems we deal with this more and more seasons...2013 - 217 were four weird years that may or may not offset this ...but by and large, since 2000, late season +PNAPs and cold loading have been increased in frequencing compared to the previous 200 -some odd years of climo, and...doing it on top of the CC hockey stick curve, just like was theoretically proposed. 

So, maybe no one is actually arguing this - hahaha...but still, it's to the point ( for me ) where I'm not surprised... Oh, sure - that scale and degree of 520 dm SPVs passing through Upstate NY is suprising...but the idea of delaying seasonal commitment should not be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Typhoon Tip said:

I really wish folks would start ubiquitously gaining exposure to the cornucopia of studies formally being papered/peer-reviewed, that are frankly free now..  Baffling, but seasonal lag due to Pacific warm surplus folding over continental mean circulation eddies was floated by theoretical works in the 1990s even... 

well... here we are.  Would anyone with a modicum of cogency argue THAT up there isn't seasonal f'um lag?  It makes sense... because as May progresses into June...the continents concomitantly heat up, and that then stops the trough aspect of the Pac-ridge/continental trough coupling model.. 

It seems we deal with this more and more seasons...2013 - 217 were four weird years that may or may not offset this ...but by and large, since 2000, late season +PNAPs and cold loading have been increased in frequencing compared to the previous 200 -some odd years of climo, and...doing it on top of the CC hockey stick curve, just like was theoretically proposed. 

So, maybe no one is actually arguing this - hahaha...but still, it's to the point ( for me ) where I'm not surprised... Oh, sure - that scale and degree of 520 dm SPVs passing through Upstate NY is suprising...but the idea of delaying seasonal commitment should not be. 

There may be something to that....I was just checking over ORH's daily record low maxes (these tend to be less sensitive to changing land use than minimums) and about 22% of them during the March/April/May months are from 2000-onward.

That is despite the period of record only being 20 years out of 125 (about 16%) and despite climate warming. We wouldn't expect 22% vs a 16% rate to be that weird in a static climate, but it definitely is a little suspicious in a warming climate. We'd expect later years to be underrepresented and instead it is the opposite. They are over-represented.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

There may be something to that....I was just checking over ORH's daily record low maxes (these tend to be less sensitive to changing land use than minimums) and about 22% of them during the March/April/May months are from 2000-onward.

That is despite the period of record only being 20 years out of 125 (about 16%) and despite climate warming. We wouldn't expect 22% vs a 16% rate to be that weird in a static climate, but it definitely is a little suspicious in a warming climate. We'd expect later years to be underrepresented and instead it is the opposite. They are over-represented.

Precisely ...glad you picked up on the implicit idea of 'counter-intuitive'  ...

Anyway, it's long been theorized that this isn't an even march.  Some places do counter the mean overall, ...we just may be one of those over eastern N/A

There's also that bag of tricks surrounding the Atlantic ( and probably might be somewhat applicable to the Pacific too ) thermo-haline cycling and surface densification breakdown causing the suppression of the G-string ... ( that's one warming we we actually want! )  Jokes aside, I'm sure you are familiar, but with the Lab current and NW Europe getting cold when the rest of the world heats for a century ... I don't think this is that...no, but it's just along that same idea that there are offset regions/phenomenon -

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As an after thought for Ray - ... next year's seasonal outlook effort should go like, 

Blah blah blah blah pop-cycle headache prose ....  with perhaps a 20% increased chance for a spring cold and snow lingering into May.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Typhoon Tip said:

As an after thought for Ray - ... next year's seasonal outlook effort should go like, 

Blah blah blah blah pop-cycle headache prose ....  with perhaps a 20% increased chance for a spring cold and snow lingering into May.  

I figure you will get a kick out of today's daily Euro 200 hour clown show:

 

 

May1_12zEuro204_h5.png

May1_12zEuro204_h85.png

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, ORH_wxman said:

I figure you will get a kick out of today's daily Euro 200 hour clown show:

 

 

May1_12zEuro204_h5.png

May1_12zEuro204_h85.png

Interesting immediate observation there for me is that the 850 mb is cold ... but not representing - 

Imagining if that were Feb 2, and that 500 mb would have and under riding 850mb -15 to even -20 C isotherm down Worcester latitude, so it's like negotiating with the sun - haha...

I dunno.. .I'm pretty high confident for an obnoxious cold shot into May there, ...probably a hard freeze/damage to orchard trees even... but I don't know if needs to be all that.  Hell, history happens though, too.  We'll see.   Plenty of time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Euro ensemble mean 540 line moves south of BOS/ORH at 96 hours and doesn't move north again until 276 hours. Over a full week in May...basically the entire 2nd week of May, not even the first week. How screwed up is that?

 

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, ORH_wxman said:

The Euro ensemble mean 540 line moves south of BOS/ORH at 96 hours and doesn't move north again until 276 hours. Over a full week in May...basically the entire 2nd week of May, not even the first week. How screwed up is that?

 

Mid spring warmth. No cold in Canada. 

  • Haha 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ORH_wxman said:

There may be something to that....I was just checking over ORH's daily record low maxes (these tend to be less sensitive to changing land use than minimums) and about 22% of them during the March/April/May months are from 2000-onward.

That is despite the period of record only being 20 years out of 125 (about 16%) and despite climate warming. We wouldn't expect 22% vs a 16% rate to be that weird in a static climate, but it definitely is a little suspicious in a warming climate. We'd expect later years to be underrepresented and instead it is the opposite. They are over-represented.

Are you saying the record low Max’s just for those months? That’s impressive to me. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What a crock of crap...this is absolutely absurd...pathetic. May as well just cancel severe wx season too...I mean everything else is cancelled. How fooking ridiculous we get this pattern now INSTEAD OF WINTER when it's supposed to happen. Biggest piece of junk I've ever seen. You can't get any more crap then this. WTF is going on? 

  • Haha 2
  • Weenie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, CoastalWx said:

Mid spring warmth. No cold in Canada. 

Lol. Unreal. At least we can still pop 55-60 with -1 or -2 850s this time of year if it’s sunny, but good grief. Gonna be like pulling teeth to get a 70F in the first half of May aside from this weekend maybe. 

Where the hell was this pattern in winter? What an epic period we would have had if the last 6 weeks had happened in February/early March. 

Theres gonna be another snow threat I bet. Prob NNE but if there’s ever a pattern to try and get flakes down here in May, this would be it. 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...